Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management (품질경영학회지)

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Exploratory Study on the Trends and Introductions of Innovation Management System International Standards

혁신경영시스템 국제표준 개발 동향 및 도입 방안에 관한 탐색적 연구

  • Park, Se-Hoon (Pukyong National University Graduate School of Management of Technology) ;
  • Chun, Dong-Phil (Pukyong National University Graduate School of Management of Technology)
  • 박세훈 (부경대학교 기술경영전문대학원) ;
  • 천동필 (부경대학교 기술경영전문대학원)
  • Received : 2018.10.13
  • Accepted : 2018.11.25
  • Published : 2018.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to introduce the development trend of international standard in the innovative management system and propose the application method of the standard for SME certification system. Methods: This study is based on literature studies and case studies considering the initial stage of development of standards as well as lack of domestic and international research examples. In the literature review, we focused on the characteristics of the innovation management system standards at the national, regional and global level. We examined case studies of Spain and Portugal as case studies. Besides, the evaluation items and certification status of domestic innovative SMEs certification were also searched to find out how to introduce them in Korea. Results: The results of this study can be summarized in three major points. First, new international standards of innovation management are being developed under the ISO management system standard and are currently in the DIS stage. Second, in the case of Spain adopting the national innovation management system standard, it has been reported that the innovation management system standard has a significant effect on the innovation ability and management performance. Third, it was not easy to establish a standardized innovation process between the innovation based on creativity and the standardized based product. The Oslo manual was not enough to provide enough guidance in this area. Conclusion: Companies that want to strengthen their organizational innovation capabilities from a management system point of view and Policymakers that want to plan the upgrading and integrated certification operating system of the domestic innovation SME certification need to consider the ISO 50500 series as a global level standard other than the Oslo manual.

Keywords

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_761_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Reserch framework SIMSMA2 Source : Mir, Casadesús and Petnji(2016: p.30)

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_761_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. ISO/TC279 Organization structure Source : ISO/TC279 Strategic business plan(2014)

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_761_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. The framework to develop and manage innovation partnerships Source : ISO/DIS 50503:2018 p.2

Table 1. Definitions of Innovation

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_761_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Classification of Innovation Process Model by Rothwell

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_761_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Classification of North American Innovation Process Model

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_761_t0003.png 이미지

Tabel 4. CEN/TC389 Innovation Management Standards

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_761_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Existing standards for innovative management systems by country

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_761_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. ISO/TC279 Participation

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_761_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Standards being developed by ISO/TC 279

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_761_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. ISO/DIS 50501:2018 Table of contents and main contents

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_761_t0008.png 이미지

Tabel 9. Development Trends of Korean Standards & Certifications

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_761_t0009.png 이미지

Table 10. Comparison of evaluation criteria of innovative SMEs

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_761_t0010.png 이미지

Table 11. Innobiz certification evaluation and examination items

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_761_t0011.png 이미지

Table 12. Certification status of domestic companies ISO and Innovative companies

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_761_t0012.png 이미지

Table 13. Status of duplicate certification of domestic companies ISO, INNOBIZ, MAINBIZ

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_761_t0013.png 이미지

References

  1. Anonymous. 2018. "VIP report for the renaissance of the Korean peninsula. 18-05 (Volume 720): Four directions of industrial policy to realize innovation growth." Hyundai Economic Research Institute.
  2. Bossink, B. A. G. 2002. "The strategic function of quality in the management of innovation." Total Qual Manage 13(2):195-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544120120102432
  3. Caraca, J., Lundvall, B. and Mendonca, S. 2009. "The changing role of science in the innovation process: From Queen to Cinderella?." Technological Forecasting & Social Change 76(6):861-867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.08.003
  4. Carter, C. F., and Williams, B. R. 1957. Industry and technical progress. Oxford University Press.
  5. Clark, C. H. 1980. Idea management: How to motivate creativity and innovation. New York: American Management Associations.
  6. Cooper, R. G. 1996. "Overhauling the new product process," Industrial Marketing Management 25(6):465-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(96)00062-4
  7. Cooper, R. G., and Kleinschmidt, E. J. 1990. New products: The key factors in success. South-Western Educational Pub.
  8. Damanpour, F., and Schneider, M. 2006. "Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: effects of environment, organization and top managers 1." Br J Manage 17(3):215-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00498.x
  9. de Casanove, A., Morel, L. and Negny, S. 2017. ISO50500 series innovation management: overview and potential usages in organizations. ISPIM.
  10. G., Pleschak, F., and Sabisch, H. 1992. "Aktuelle Aufgaben des Forschungs-und Entwicklungscontrolling in Industrieunternehmen." Innovationsmanagement und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit Gabler:137-157.
  11. Edquist, C. 1999. Innovation policy: A systemic approach. Citeseer.
  12. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. "Building theories from case study research." Academy of management review 14(4):532-550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
  13. Eisenhardt, K. M., and Graebner, M. E. 2007. "Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges." The Academy of Management Journal 50(1):25-32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
  14. Galanakis, K. 2006. "Innovation process. Make sense using systems thinking," Technovation 26(11):1222-1232.
  15. Hauschildt, J. 1993. Innovationsmanagement. Munich: Franz Vahlen.
  16. Hughes, G. D., and Chafin, D. C. 1996. "Turning new product development into a continuous learning process." Journal of Product Innovation Management: AN INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION OF THE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 13(2):89-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1320089
  17. ISO. 2014. ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1: Consolidated ISO Supplement-Procedures specific to ISO. Switzerland.
  18. ISO/TC279. 2014. Strategic business plan.
  19. ISO. 2018a. ISO/DIS 50503:2018 Tools and methods for innovation partnership - Guidance. Switzerland.
  20. ISO. 2018b. ISO/DIS 50501:2018 "Innovation managememt system - Guidance. Switzerland.
  21. Jang Byeongkwon. 2017. "Development of Tourism Industry through Innovative Growth." Korea Tourism Policy (70):10-21.
  22. Jang, Youngsoon., and Kim, Joomi. 2007. "An Empirical Study on the Characteristics and Stress Factors of Technological Innovative SMEs." IE Interfaces 20(3):418-426.
  23. Jayawarna, D., and Holt, R. 2009. "Knowledge and quality management: An R&D perspective." Technovation 29(11):775-785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.004
  24. Jayawarna, D., and Pearson, A. W. 2001. "The role of ISO 9001 in managing the quality of R&D activities." The TQM magazine 13(2):120-128. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780110366033
  25. Kang, Sungwook., and Lee, Kihoon. 2012. "A comparative analysis of the domestic innovation SME certification policy system: focusing on Oslo manual." Creation and Innovation 5(2):1-36.
  26. Kanji, G. K. 1996. "Can total quality management help innovation?." Total Qual Manage 7(1):3-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544129650035007
  27. Kelly, P., and Kranzberg, M. 1975. "Technological innovation: A critical review of current knowledge." Advanced Technology and Science Studies Group, Georgia Tech.
  28. Keogh, W., and Bower, D. J. 1997. "Total quality management and innovation: a pilot study of innovative companies in the oil and gas industry." Total Qual Manage 8(2-3):196-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544129710008
  29. Kline, S. J., and Rosenberg, N. 2010. "An overview of innovation. In Anonymous Studies On Science And The Innovation Process: Selected Works of Nathan Rosenberg." World Scientific:173-203.
  30. Kondo, Y. 1996. "Are creative ability and work standardization in contradictory relationship?." Training for Quality 4(3):35-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684879610125734
  31. Kondo, Y. 2000. "Innovation versus standardization." The TQM Magazine 12(1):6-10. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780010287177
  32. Lawson, B., and Samson, D. 2001. "Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capabilities approach." International journal of innovation management 5(03):377-400. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919601000427
  33. Mathur-De Vre, R. 2000. "The scope and limitations of a QA system in research." Accreditation and quality assurance 5(1):3-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007690050001
  34. Matias, Joao Carlos de Oliveira., and Coelho, D. A. 2011. "Integrated total quality management: Beyond zero defects theory and towards innovation." Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 22(8):891-910. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2011.593862
  35. Ministry of Strategy and Finance. 2017. "Direction of Economic Policy in 2018."
  36. Mir, M., Casadesus, M. and Petnji, L. H. 2016. "The impact of standardized innovation management systems on innovation capability and business performance : An empirical sutdy." J Eng Technol Manage 41:26-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2016.06.002
  37. Myers, S., and Marquis, D. G. 1969. Successful industrial innovation, Institute of Public Administration. Institute of Public Administration.
  38. Small and Medium Venture Business Division. 2018a, Inno-Biz Operation Regulations for Technology Innovation.
  39. Small and Medium-Sized Venture Enterprise. 2018b. Regulation on Management of Innovative SMEs (Main-Biz) System.
  40. OECD, 2005. Oslo manual : guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris.
  41. Peetri, M., Xavier, A., and Passos, A. 2013. "Understanding the benefits of standardizing innovation management." Proc., Science and Technology Policy and Management in Latin Ibero-American Contexts.
  42. Perdomo-Ortiz, J., González-Benito, J., and Galende, J. 2006. "Total quality management as a forerunner of business innovation capability." Technovation 26(10):1170-1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.09.008
  43. Planing, P. 2014. Innovation acceptance: the case of advanced driver-assistance systems. Springer Science & Business Media.
  44. Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.
  45. Prajogo, D. I., and Hong, S. W. 2008. "The effect of TQM on performance in R&D environments: A perspective from South Korean firms." Technovation 28(12):855-863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.06.001
  46. Prajogo, D. I., and Sohal, A. S. 2003. "The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance: An empirical examination." International journal of quality & reliability management 20(8):901-918. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710310493625
  47. Prajogo, D. I., and Sohal, A. S. 2006. "The integration of TQM and technology/R&D management in determining quality and innovation performance." Omega 34(3):296-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.11.004
  48. Roberts, R. 1998. "Managing innovation: The pursuit of competitive advantage and the design of innovation intense environments." Research policy 27(2):159-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00034-1
  49. Rosenbloom, R. S., and Spencer, W. J. 1996. Engines of Innovation: US Industrial Research at the End of an Era. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  50. Rossetto, S. 1995. "Quality and innovation: a conceptual model of their interaction." Total Qual Manage 6(3):221-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544129550035396
  51. Rothwell, R. 1992. "Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s." R&D Management 22(3):221-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1992.tb00812.x
  52. Rothwell, R. 1994. "Towards the fifth-generation innovation process." International marketing review 11(1):7-31. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339410057491
  53. Sabisch, H. and Pleschak, F. 1996. Innovationsmanagement, Schaffer-Poeschel. Stuttgart.
  54. Santos-Vijande, M. L., and Alvarez-Gonzalez, L. I. 2007. "TQM and Firms Performance: An EFQM Excellence Model Research Based Survey." International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management 2(2): 21-41.
  55. Saunila, M. and Ukko, J. 2012. "A conceptual framework for the measurement of innovation capability and its effects." Baltic Journal of Management 7(4):355-375. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465261211272139
  56. Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development (translation of second German edition by Redvers Opie). Harvard University.
  57. Schumpeter, J. A. 1939. Business cycles. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  58. Small and Medium Venture Business Division. 2018a. Inno-Biz Operation Regulations for Technology Innovation.
  59. Small and Medium-Sized Venture Enterprise. 2018b. Regulation on Management of Innovative SMEs (Main-Biz) System.
  60. Sundbo, J. 1998. The theory of innovation: enterpreneurs, technology and strategy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  61. Trauffler, G., and Tschirky, H. 2006. Sustained innovation management: assimilating radical and incremental innovation management. Springer.
  62. Ulrich, K. T., and Eppinger, S. 2011. Product Design and Development. McGraw-Hill Education
  63. Verworn, B., and Herstatt, C. 2002. The innovation process: an introduction to process models. Working Papers/Technologie-und Innovationsmanagement Technische Universitat Hamburg-Harburg.
  64. Wright, C., Sturdy, A., and Wylie, N. 2012. "Management innovation through standardization: Consultants as standardizers of organizational practice." Research Policy 41(3):652-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.004
  65. Yin, R. K. 2017. Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
  66. Zairi, M. 1994. "Innovation or innovativeness? Results of a benchmarking study." Total Qual Manage 5(3):27-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544129400000023
  67. CEN. 2018. "Innovation Management." Accessed September 14. https://www.cen.eu/work/areas/InnoMgmt/Pages/default.aspx
  68. INNOBIZ. 2018. "Status of Innobiz." Accessed September 14. http://www.innobiz.net/company/company3_list.asp
  69. ISO. 2018. "TC279." Accessed September 06. https://www.iso.org/committee/4587737/x/catalogue/
  70. MAINBIZ. 2018. "Reference Room." Accessed September 14. https://www.mainbiz.go.kr/usr/board/comData.do
  71. Wikipedia. "Innovation Management." 2018. Accessed September 06. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innovation_man agement