Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education (한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육)

The Korean Elementary Science Education Society (한국초등과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Elementary School Teachers' Use of Visual Representations and their Perceptions of the Functions of Visual Representations

초등교사의 시각적 표상 활용 실태 및 시각적 표상의 기능에 대한 인식

  • Received : 2018.04.27
  • Accepted : 2018.05.16
  • Published : 2018.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study surveyed the elementary school teachers' use of visual representations and their perceptions of the functions of visual representations in the teaching of electricity unit. A total of 110 elementary teachers who have experiences in teaching electricity unit responded to online survey. The result showed firstly that most of the teachers use visual representations in their teaching and it is mostly limited to those presented in textbooks or images that they can get easily from internet search. Secondly, elementary teachers thought that they have high ability in using visual representations and low ability in understanding students' visual presentation ability. Thirdly, visual representations are more often preferred to be used as teacher-centered ways than student-centered ways for motivating students and conceptual understanding. However, in case of scientific inquiry, both teacher-centered and student-centered ways were equally preferred. Lastly, the teachers' perceptions of the functions of visual representations were categorized into 'teaching-instrumental function', 'learning-instrumental function', 'communicative-instrumental function' and 8 subcategories were found. The most frequent function was the 'information delivery function' in the 'teaching-instrumental function' category. Implications for teacher education and further studies were discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Bungum, B. (2008). Images of physics: An explorative study of the changing character of visual images in Norwegian physics textbooks. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 4(2), 132-141.
  2. Chittleborough, G. & Treagust, D. F. (2007). Correct interpretation of chemical diagrams requires transforming from one level of representation to another. Research in Science Education, 38(4), 463-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9059-4
  3. Coleman, M. & Smolkin L. (2011). Elementary teachers’ use of graphical representations in science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(7), 613-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9204-1
  4. Colin, P., Chauvet, F. & Viennot, L. (2002). Reading images in optics: Students’ difficulties and teachers’ views. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 313-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110078923
  5. Cook, M. (2011). Teachers’ use of visual representations in the science classroom. Science Education International, 22(3), 175-184.
  6. Dimopoulos, K., Koulaidis, V. & Sklaveniti, S. (2003). Towards an analysis of visual images in school science textbooks and press articles about science and technology. Research in Science Education, 33(2), 189-216. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025006310503
  7. Eilam, B. & Gilbert, J. K. (2014). The significance of visual representations in the teaching of science. In Science teachers' use of visual representations (pp. 3-28). Springer International Publishing.
  8. Han, K. & Noh, S. (2003). An analysis on the utilization of teacher's guides for science in elementary school. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 22(1), 51-64.
  9. Jo, K., Jho, H. & Yoon, H.-G. (2015) Analysis of visual representations related to electromagnetism in primary and secondary science textbooks. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 65(4), 343-357. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.65.343
  10. Kim, T.-S. & Kim, B.-K. (2002). The comparison of graphing abilities of pupils in grades 7 to 12 based on TOGS (The test of graphing in science). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(4), 768-778.
  11. Kozma, R. & Russell, J. (2005). Students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualizations in Science Education (pp. 121-146). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  12. Liu, Y., Won, M. & Treagust, D. F. (2014). Secondary biology teachers' use of different types of diagrams for different purposes. In Science teachers' use of visual representations (pp. 103-121). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer International Publishing.
  13. McKenzie, D. L. & Padilla, M. J. (1986). The construction and validation of the test of graphing in science (TOGS). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(7), 571-579. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230702
  14. Nitz, S., Ainsworth, S., Nerdel, C. & Prechtl, H. (2014). Do student perceptions of teaching predict the development of representational competence and biological knowledge? Learning & Instruction, 31, 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.003
  15. Ozcelik, A. T. & McDonald, S. P. (2013). Preservice science teachers’ uses of inscriptions in science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(7), 1103-1132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9352-1
  16. Park, S. & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
  17. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  18. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
  19. Tippett, C. D. (2016) What recent research on diagrams suggests about learning with rather than learning from visual representations in science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 725-746. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1158435
  20. Topsakal, U. U. & Oversby, J. (2013). What do scientist and non-scientist teachers notice about biology diagrams? Journal of Biological Education, 47(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2012.753102
  21. Yoon, H.-G., Jo, K. & Jho, H. (2017). Secondary teachers’ perception about and actual use of visual representations in the teaching of electromagnetism. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(2), 253-262. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.2.0253