Communications of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis Study of Mathematical Problem Structure through Concept Map

Concept Map을 통한 수학 문제의 구조 분석 연구

  • Suh, Bo Euk (Department of Mathematics Education, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2017.10.26
  • Accepted : 2018.01.10
  • Published : 2018.02.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the early days, the use of concept maps in mathematics education focused on how to represent mathematical ideas in the concept map. In recent years, however, concept maps have proved beneficial for improving problem solving ability. Conceptual diagrams can be used for collaboration among students, tools for exploring problems, tools for introducing problem structures, tools for developing and systematizing knowledge systems. In this study, we focused on the structure analysis of mathematical problems using Concept Map based on the analysis of previous research. In addition, we have devised a method of using concept maps for problem analysis and a method of analysis of systematic mathematical problem structure. The method developed in this study was found to have significant value by applying to the university scholastic ability test.

수학교육에서 Concept Map(개념그림)을 활용하기 시작한 초기에는 Concept Map이라는 그림 안에 수학적 아이디어를 어떻게 표상할 수 있느냐에 초점이 맞추어져 있었다. 하지만, 최근 연구에 따르면 Concept Map이 문제해결력과 밀접한 관련이 있다. 구체적으로 Concept Map은 학생들 사이의 협력적 문제해결의 도구, 문제를 탐구하기 위한 도구, 문제의 구조를 소개하기 위한 도구, 지식의 체계를 개발하고 체계화하는 도구 등으로 사용될 수 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 Concept Map에 대한 선행연구 분석을 기반으로 Concept Map을 활용한 수학 문제의 구조 분석에 집중하였다. 그 결과 수학 문제 구조 분석을 위한 Concept Map의 활용 방법을 개발하였고, 개발된 자료를 적용하여 실제 수학 문제 분석에 적용함으로써 그 실현 가능성을 확인하였다. 본 연구 결과를 통해 수학 문제 구조의 파악, 수학과 교육과정 및 교과서와 일관성 있는 문제의 개발, 수학 문제의 난이도 분석 등에 효과적으로 활용될 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육부 (2015a). 2015 개정 교육과정, 교육부 고시 제2015-108호. (Ministry of Education (2015a). 2015 Revised National Curriculum, Ministry of Education Notice 2015-108)
  2. 교육부 (2015b). 수학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호[별책 8]. (Ministry of Education (2015b). 2015 Revised National Curriculum of Mathematics, Ministry of Education Notice 2015-74)
  3. 서보억 (2012). 개념도를 활용한 남녀 성차에 대한 문항 분석 방안, 한국수학교육학회 학술대회 프로시딩. (Suh, B. E (2012). An Analysis of the Questionnaire on Gender Differences Using Conceptual Diagrams, Proceedings of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Conference)
  4. 신성균․강문봉․황혜정 (1993). 수학과 문제해결력 신장을 위한 교수-학습 자료 개발 연구. 한국교육개발원 연구보고 RRE 93-13. (Shin, S. K., Kang, M. B. & Hwang, H. J. (1993). Development of Teaching-Learning Materials for Improving Mathematics and Problem Solving Ability, Korean Educational Development Institute Research Report RRE 93-13.)
  5. 한인기 (1998). 깔야긴의 수학 문제 분류, 대한수학회 뉴스레터, 제62호, 20-25. (Han, I. K. (1998). Classification of mathematical problems, Korean Mathematical Society Newsletter, No. 62, 20-25.)
  6. 황혜정․나귀수․최승현․박경미․임재훈․서동엽 (2016). 수학교육학신론, 문음사. (Hwang, H. J., Na, K. S., Choi, S. H., Park, K. M., Lim, J. H. & Seo, D. H. (2016). Theory of Mathematics Education, Moon Eum Sa.)
  7. Albert, D. & Steiner, C. M. (2005). Representing domain knowledge by concept maps: How to validate them?. In T. Okamoto, D. Albert, T. Honda & F. W. Hesse(Eds.), The 2nd Joint Workshop of Cognition and Learning through Media-Communication for Advanced e-Learning (pp. 169-174).
  8. Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  9. Canas, A. J., Greg, H., Roger, C., Niranjan, S., James, L., Gloria, G., Thomas, E., Mario, A. & Rodrigo, C. (2004). "CmapTools: a knowledge modeling and sharing environment"(PDF). In Canas, Alberto J.; Novak, Joseph D.; Gonzalez Garcia, Fermin Maria. Concept maps: theory, methodology, technology: proceedings of the first International Conference on Concept Mapping, CMC 2004, Pamplona, Spain, Sept 14-17, 2004. Pamplona: Direccion de Publicaciones de la Universidad Publica de Navarra. ISBN 9788497690669. OCLC 433188714.
  10. Cardemone, P. F. (1975). Concept maps: A technique of analyzing a discipline and its use in the curriculum and instruction in a portion of a college level mathematics skills course. Unpublished M. S. thesis, Cornell University.
  11. Fuata'i, K. A. (1998). Learning to solve mathematics problems through concept mapping and Vee mapping. Apia, Samoa: National University of Samoa.
  12. Fuata'i, K. A. (2009). Analysing the 'Measurement' strand using concept maps and Vee diagrams. In K. A. Fuata'i (Ed.), Concept mapping in mathematics. New York, NY: Springer.
  13. Hao, J. X. & Kwok, R. C. (2007). Predicting problem-solving performance using concept map. In Proceedings of the 11th Pacific Asia Conference on information Systems. Retrieved January 30, 2012, from http://www.pacis-net.org/file/2007/1242.pdf
  14. Hong, G. (2008). Collaborative concept mapping as an instructional strategy, Mueller.
  15. Karoline, A. (2009). Concept mapping in mathematics, Springer Verlag.
  16. Kenneth, P. (2008). Concept-Map Assessments, Mueller.
  17. Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The Psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago
  18. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  19. Minemier, L. (1983). Concept mapping and educational tool and its use in a college level mathematics skills course. Unpublished M. S. thesis, Cornell University.
  20. Moon, B., Hoffman, R. R. & Novak, J. (2009). Concept mapping in mathematics, CRC Press.
  21. Novak, J. D. (1977). A theory of education. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  22. Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept maps and Vee diagrams: Two meta-cognitive tools for science and mathematics education. Instructional Science, 19, 29-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377984
  23. Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  24. Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or appropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548-571. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10032
  25. Novak, J. D., & Canas, A. J. (2009). The development and evolution of the concept mapping tool leading to a new model for mathematics education. In K. A. Fuata'i (Ed.), Concept mapping in mathematics. New York, NY: Springer.
  26. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Novak, J. D., & Musonda, D. (1991). A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 117-153. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312028001117
  28. Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it, Princeton University Press.
  29. Primo, M. R. & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of research in science teaching, 3(6), pp.569-600.
  30. Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2000). On the use of concept maps as an assessment tool in science: What we have learned so far. Retrieved January 31, 2012, from http://redie.uabc.mx/vol2no1/ contents-ruizpri.html
  31. Schmitau, J. (2004). Uses of concept mapping in teacher education in mathematics. In Proceedings of the 1st Int. Conference on Concept Mapping Systems. Retrieved January 31, 2012, from http://cmc.ihmc.us/papers/cmc2004-269.pdf
  32. Tao, T. (2006). Solving mathematical problems: A personal perspective, first edition. London: Oxford University Press.
  33. Zeitz, P. (1999). The art and craft of problem solving. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.