Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship (벤처창업연구)

The Korean Society of Business Venturing (한국벤처창업학회)
권호 표지

A Study on the Development of the Triple helix and University-Business incubation

트리플 힐릭스와 대학 창업보육의 발전방안

  • Seol, Myung Hwan (Department of Management and Accounting, Hanbat National University) ;
  • Choi, Jong In (Department of Management and Accounting, Hanbat National University)
  • 설명환 (한밭대학교 경영회계학과) ;
  • 최종인 (한밭대학교 경영회계학과)
  • Received : 2018.03.07
  • Accepted : 2018.06.29
  • Published : 2018.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research focuses on the university-business incubation from the prospective of triple helix and summarizes complementary researches and develop plans for university-business incubation. To pursue these objectives, we analyzed the studies of triple helix on domestic as well as overseas university-business incubators and their collaboration. The findings of this study showed that firstly In order to innovate the business incubator of the university, it is necessary to secure sufficient competence for the capability. For this purpose, Research and policy implications from various perspectives must be preceded.. Second, the collaborative relationship of business incubations should lead to organic and dynamic cooperative relations instead of static cooperative partnerships. Furthermore, based on the internal innovation that runs the business incubation program together with bottom-up rather than top-down approach, it is necessary to plan incubation and lead the transformation through creative ideas. Third, for the dynamic collaboration of business incubation, the management and practice of the organization should be given priority so that the boundary spanning appropriate to each situation, which turn increase the absorption capacity. As a future direction, studies are expected to explore the development of innovative university-business incubation about boundary spanning and knowledge transformation.

본 연구는 트리플 힐릭스 (Triple Helix) 관점으로 대학의 창업보육을 살펴봄으로써 대학 창업보육과 관련된 연구의 보완과 발전방안을 제시하고자 한다. 이를 위해 국내 외 창업보육과 관련된 트리플 힐릭스 (Triple Helix) 논문을 분석하였으며 이를 통해 트리플 힐릭스(Triple Helix)와 대학 창업보육을 연계하여 살펴보았다. 첫째, 대학 창업보육의 혁신을 위해 운영인력에 대한 충분한 역량 확보가 우선되어야 한다. 이를 위해 다양한 관점에서의 연구와 정책적 함의가 우선 선행되어야 할 것이다. 둘째, 창업보육의 협력관계는 몇 번의 정태적인 협력관계가 아닌 유기적이며 동태적인 협력관계로 이어져야 한다. Top Down 방식이 아닌 Bottom Up으로 창업보육 프로그램을 함께 운영하는 내부에서의 혁신을 바탕으로 창업보육을 기획하고 창의적인 아이디어를 통해 변혁을 이끌어야 한다. 셋째, 창업보육의 동태적 협력을 위해 각 주체 간의 조직마다 상황에 맞는 경계관리활동(Boundary Spanning)을 파악하고, 흡수역량으로 이어질 수 있도록 조직에 대한 관리와 실천이 우선되어야 한다. 본 연구에서 제시한 각 주체 간 경계활동과 지식변환에 관해서는 추후 연구과제로 남기며 혁신적인 대학 창업보육의 발전을 기대해본다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aaboen L.(2009). Explaining incubators using firm analogy. Technovation 29(10), 657-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.007
  2. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M.(1994). R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(2), 336-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109888
  3. Aernoudt R.(2004). Incubators: Tool for Entrepreneurship?. Small Business Economics 23(2), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000027665.54173.23
  4. Aerts K., Matthyssens P., & Vandenbempt K.(2007). Critical role and screening practices of European business incubators. Technovation 27(5), 254-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.12.002
  5. Allen D. N., & McCluskey R.(1990). Structure, Policy, Services, and Performance in the Business Incubator Industry. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(2), 61-77
  6. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F.(1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative science quarterly, 634-665.
  7. Burt, R. S.(1992). Structural hole. Harvard Business School Press. Cambridge, MA.
  8. Carlile, P. R.(2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization science, 15(5), 555-568. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0094
  9. Champenois, C., & Etzkowitz, H.(2017). From boundary line to boundary space: The creation of hybrid organizations as a Triple Helix micro-foundation. Technovation.
  10. Choi, J. I.(2016). Traversing The Valley of Death. seoul: HAN KYUNG SA.
  11. Choi, J. I., Kim, K. Y., & Song, C. H.(2013). The Direction to the Entrepreneurship Education Center: Insight from the Kauffman Campus Initiative. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.8.1.201303.89
  12. Choi, J. I., & Lee, K. J.(2011). A Literature Review of Performance Determinants of Business Incubator Based on Foreign English Literatures. Journal of technology innovation, 19(3), 115-140.
  13. Choi, J. I., & Byun, Y. J.(2016). The Exploratory study of Capacity Building for Creative Incubation Center: Focus on the University Business Incubator. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 11(2), 135-144 https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.11.2.201604.135
  14. De Oliveira, A. H., Marins, F. A. S., & Delamaro, M. C.(2017). Business Incubators in the Triple Helix Model: An Example in Brazilian Southeastern. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 6(6).
  15. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L.(1997). Introduction to special Issue on Science Policy Dimensions of the Triple Helix of university-industry-Government relations. Science and Public Policy, 24(1), 2-5.
  16. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L.(2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  17. Etzkowitz, H.(2002a). The triple helix of university-industry-government: Implications for policy and evaluation. Report 2002: 11, SISTER Swedish Institute for Studies in Education and Research, 11, 2-4.
  18. Etzkowitz, H.(2002b). Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks. Science and Public Policy, 29(2), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154302781781056
  19. Etzkowitz, H.(2003). Research Groups as 'Quasi-Firms': The Invention of the Entrepreneurial University. Research Policy, 32(1), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00009-4
  20. Etzkowitz, H., de Mello, J. M. C., & Almeida, M.(2005). Towards "meta-innovation" in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix. Research policy, 34(4), 411-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.011
  21. Hannon, P. D.(2005). Incubation Policy and Practice: Building Practitioner and Professional Capability. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(1), 57-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000510579644
  22. Han, J. H., & Byun, S. K.(2009). An Empirical Study on Cooperative Relations among University, Public Agencies, Public Research Institutes and Firms for Innovation Activities of Regional Firms: Focusing on Trust Variable. Korean Public Management Review, 23(3), 145-168. https://doi.org/10.24210/kapm.2009.23.3.006
  23. Hong, D. U., Lee, I. H., & Son, J. S.(2017). A Study on the Effects of Support Service of Gyeonggi-do Cultural Contents Area Business Incubating Center on Corporate Performance : Focusing on the Business Validity of Business Start-Up Items. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 12(4), 47-60.
  24. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R.(1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577-598. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118401
  25. Katila, R., & Ahuja, G.(2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of management journal, 45(6), 1183-1194. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069433
  26. Kim, T. K.(2016). Small-business Counseling : Impact for Applying Triple Helix, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 11(2), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.11.2.201604.183
  27. Kim, T. M., & Choi, K. H.(2017). Measuring the Meta Efficiency and Its Determinants on Efficiency in Business Incubator Center. Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 42(4), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.7737/JKORMS.2017.42.4.037
  28. Kim, M. J., & Lee, J. H.(2016). The Study on Internet of Things(IoT) Ecosystem Analysis and Its Policy Direction in Gyeonggi Province. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 19(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2016.19.1.18
  29. Kim, W. M., & Lee, C. H.(2005). Roles of the University in the Development of Venture Firms. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 18(5), 2079-2106.
  30. Lee, J. H., Kim, T. Y. & Lee, C. W.(2009), The Triple Helix System of Innovation in the ${\Phi}resund$ Food Cluster. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 12(4), 388-405. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2009.12.4.388
  31. Lee, J. H., & Lee, C. W.(2015). The Dynamic Evolution of the Cambridge Cluster and the Entrepreneurial University. Journal of The Korean Association of Regional Geographers, 21(3), 489-502.
  32. Lee, J. H., & Lee, C. W.(2016). In Search of an Alternative Regional Industrial Policy by Linking Cluster Policy with Smart Specialization Strategy and the Triple Helix Innovation System. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 19(4), 799-811. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2016.19.4.799
  33. Lee, J. H., & Lee, C. W.(2014). Sustaining Cluster Evolution through Building the Triple-Helix Spaces: The Case of the Research Triangle Park, USA. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 17(2), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2014.17.2.249
  34. Lee, C. W., Kim, T. Y., & Lee, J. H.(2009). Exploring the Triple Helix Innovation System in the Dutch Food Cluster(Food Valley). Journal of The Korean Association of Regional Geographers, 15(5), 554-571
  35. Lee, C. W., Lee, J. H., & Park, K. S.(2010). An Inquiry into the Triple Helix as a New Regional Innovation Model. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 13(3), 335-353. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2010.13.3.335
  36. Lee, C. W., & Lee, J. H.(2014). High-Tech Cluster Evolution and the Role of the Triple-Helix Actors: The Case of the Research Triangle Park, USA. Journal of The Korean Association of Regional Geographers, 20(3), 256-268.
  37. Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H.(1998). The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25(3), 195-203.
  38. Leydesdorff, L.(2000). The Triple Helix: An Evolutionary Model of Innovations. Research Policy, 29(2), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00063-3
  39. Lindberg, M., Danilda, I., & Torstensson, B. M.(2012). Women Resource Centres-a creative knowledge environment of quadruple helix. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 36-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0053-8
  40. Lorenzoni, G., & Lipparini, A.(1999). The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 317-338.
  41. Lundvall, B. Å., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B.(2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research policy, 31(2), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00137-8
  42. M'Chirgui, Z.(2012). Assessing the performance of business incubators: recent France evidence. Business and Management Research, 1(1), 62.
  43. McAdam, M., & Marlow, S.(2007). Building Futures or Stealing Secrets? Entrepreneurial Cooperation and Conflict within Business Incubators. International Small Business Journal, 25(4), 361-382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242607078563
  44. Mian, S. A.(1996). Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms. Research Policy, 25(3), 325-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00828-4
  45. Mulyaningsih, H. D.(2015). Enhancing innovation in quadruple helix perspective: The case of the business incubators in Indonesia. International Business Management, 9(4), 367-371.
  46. Nam, J. G.(2014). Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations in Biotechnology Cluster: the Case of Singapore. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 17(4), 801-816. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2014.17.4.801
  47. Nam, J. G.(2015). An Analysis of Interactive Relationships among Stakeholders in Citizen Autonomy by Using The Triple Helix Model. The Korea Local Administration Review, 24(4), 125-159.
  48. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R,. & Konno, N.(2000). SECI, Ba and Leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6
  49. Park, K. S., & Lee, C. W.(2013). Characteristics of Interaction among Actors in Triple Helix of Cultural Contents Industry Cluster in Daegu. Journal of The Korean Association of Regional Geographers, 19(3), 401-415.
  50. Park, K. S.(2011). An Analysis on Triple Helix of Cultural Contents Industry Cluster in Daegu, Doctoral Dissertation. Department of Geography Graduate School, Kyungpook National University Daegu, Korea.
  51. Park, S. J., & Lee, S. M.(2013). Exploring Genetic Causal Relationships Affecting the Performance of the Market-based Elderly Jobs Project. Korean Public Administration Review, 47(4), 369-394.
  52. Rhee, J. H., & Suk, M.(2014). The Effects of THM,Triple Helix Model on the Firm Innovation: Focused on the Trust in Daegu, Gyeongbuk. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 17(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2014.17.1.69
  53. Rhoades, G., & Slaughter, S.(2006). Academic Capitalism and the new economy: privatization as shifting the target of public subsidy in higher education. The university, state, and market: The political economy of globalization in the Americas, 103-140
  54. Rothschild L., & Darr, A.(2005). Technological incubators and the social construction of innovation networks: an Israelicase study. Technovation, 25(1), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00064-6
  55. Rooney, D., Hearn, G., & Ninan, A.(Eds.).(2005). Handbook on the knowledge economy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  56. Saad, M.(2004). Issues and challenges arising from the application of innovation strategies based on the triple helix culture. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 3(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1386/ijtm.3.1.17/0
  57. Seol, M. H., & Choi, J. I.(2017). A Study of Business Incubator Policy and Research: A Review of Korean Literature. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 12(3), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.12.3.201706.147
  58. Wonglimpiyarat, J.(2016). The innovation incubator, university business incubator and technology transfer strategy: The case of Thailand. Technology in Society, 46, 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.04.002
  59. Yoon, J. R., & Kim, H. J.(2011). An Exploratory study on the Performance Factor of Business Incubator Enterprise. Korean Review of Corporation Management, 2(1), 15-42.
  60. Yoon, H. Y., & Kim, B. K.(2017). The Influence of regional environment factor on Technology-based firms' Performance-Moderator effect of Innovation Intermediaries. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 18(5), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.5.35
  61. Yusuf, S.(2008). Intermediating knowledge exchange between universities and businesses. Research Policy, 37(8), 1167-1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.011
  62. Zhao, Z. J., & Anand, J.(2013). Beyond boundary spanners: the 'collective bridge' as an efficient interunit structure for transferring collective knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 34(13), 1513-1530. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2080