한국융합학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Convergence Society)

  • 제9권7호
  • /
  • Pages.269-276
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2233-4890(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6353(eISSN)
한국융합학회 (Korea Convergence Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

우리나라 대학생의 미세먼지 관련 지각이 건강행동에 미치는 영향에 대한 탐색: 귀인양식, 관여도, 건강상태지각 및 예방행동의도를 중심으로

Exploration into effect of perception on health behavior regarding particulate matter(PM) among Korean collegians: Centered on attribution styles, involvement, perceived health status, and preventive intention

  • 주지혁 (극동대학교 언론홍보학과)
  • Joo, Ji Hhyuk (Dept. of Journalism & Communication, Far East University)
  • 투고 : 2018.03.28
  • 심사 : 2018.07.20
  • 발행 : 2018.07.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

미세먼지는 국민건강에 치명적이기 때문에 정부 당국은 다양한 정책적 노력을 통해 미세먼지 저감을 위해 노력하고 있다. 국가적 정책의 실효성을 높이기 위해서 미세먼지에 대한 개인의 인식과 위험회피행동을 이해해야 한다. 이러한 견지에서 본 연구는 미세먼지에 대한 관여도, 귀인양식, 및 건강상태지각이 예방행동에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 탐색했다. 우선 우리나라 사람들이 인식하는 미세먼지 발생원인에 대해 '일상생활 귀인', '국내 산업 및 환경 귀인' 및 '중국 산업 및 환경귀인'의 세 가지 귀인양식을 요인분석을 통해 규명하였다. 다음으로 예방행동의도에 영향을 미치는 미세먼지 관련 지각 변인들의 영향력을 밝히기 위해 단계선택방식의 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 회귀분석 최종 모형에서 '관여도(${\beta}=.465$, p<.001)', '중국산업 및 환경 귀인(${\beta}=.222$, p<.001)', '일상생활 귀인(${\beta}=.173$, p<.01)', 및 '국낸 산업 및 환경 귀인(${\beta}=.143$, p<.05)' 순으로 예방행동의도에 영향을 미치고 있었다. 마지막으로 한계점과 후속 연구를 위한 제언을 밝혔다.

As the particulate matter (PM) is fatal for human being, the government authorities try to lessen PM with a variety of policy instruments. To increase the efficiency of the policy, we need to understand people's perception and risk avoidance on PM. Thus, the research explored what attribution styles, involvement, and perceived health status have an influence on preventive intention. First, we found three attribution styles on PM occurrence through factor analysis: daily life(DL), domestic industry & environment(DI&E), and Chinese industry & environment(CI&E). We also found that involvement(${\beta}=.465$, p<.001), CI&E(${\beta}=.222$, p<.001), DL(${\beta}=.173$, p<.01), and DI&E(${\beta}=.143$, p<.05) have an influence on preventive intention in order. Finally we discussed suggestions for future study.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Y. W. Kim, H. S. Lee, H. J. Lee, & Y. J. Jang. (2015). A Study of the Public's Perception and Opinion Formation On Particulate Matter Risk: Focusing on the Moderating Effects of the Perceptions toward Promotional News and Involvement. Korean Journal of Communication & Information, (72), 52-91.
  2. Y. P. Kim. (2006). Air Pollution in Seoul Caused by Aerosols. Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 22(5), 535-553.
  3. Korean Social Trends 2014. (2014). Retrieved from http://kostat.go.kr/edu/sri_kor_new/5/6/index.board?bmode=read&bSeq=&aSeq=332659&pageNo=2&rowNum=10&navCount=10&currPg=&sTarget=title&sTxt=
  4. D. W. Kim. (2017, Sept. 27). More than 80% of high-density particulate matter occurred by the foreign factor, Domestic measure facing the limit. The Herald Business Newspaper. Retrieved from http://news.heraldcorp.com/view.php?ud=20170927000711#a
  5. B. Weiner. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions: An attributional approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  6. H. H. Kelley. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. Nebraska symposium on motivation. University of Nebraska Press.
  7. K. Jang, & Y. M. Beak. (2016). How did MERS outbreak become a political matter? : How political ideology moderates the effect of multidimensional health locus of control beliefs on citizens' attribution process of MERS outbreak. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 60(3), 36-65.
  8. S. Kim, & H. Cha. (2016). The effect of responsibility attribution message and emotion on the policy support and health behavior in obesity circumstance : An application of attribution theory and theory of planned behavior. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 60(2), 369-398. https://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2016.60.2.013
  9. J. Niederdeppe, M. A. Shapiro, & N. Porticella. (2011). Attributions of responsibility for obesity: Narrative communication reduces reactive counterarguing among liberals. Human Communication Research, 37(3), 295-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01409.x
  10. J. Niederdeppe, C. A. Bigman, A. L. Gonzales, & S. E. Gollust. (2013). Communication about health disparities in the mass media. Journal of communication, 63(1), 8-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12003
  11. S. Gollust, & J. Lynch. (2011). Who deserves health care? The effects of causal attributions and group cues on public attitudes about responsibility for health care costs. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 36(6), 1061-1095. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-1460578
  12. M. Mattson. (1999). Toward a reconceptualization of communication cues to action in the health belief model: HIV test counseling. Communications Monographs, 66(3), 240-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376476
  13. S. Hong. (2013). The Effects of Cancer-related Information Search From Media as Communication Cues on Health Behavior. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, 19(1), 78-86.
  14. Lee, H.-j. Oh, K.-A. Shin, & J. Ko. (2008). The effect of media campaign as a cue to action on influenza prevention behavior : Extending health belief model. The Korean Journal of Advertising & Public Relations, 10(4), 108-138.
  15. Advertising Dictionary. (1996). Seoul: Nanam.
  16. E. Krugman. (1977). Memory without recall, exposure without perception. Journal of advertising research, 17(4), 7-12.
  17. K.-Y. Kwahk, & S. Ji. (2008). Examining the moderating effect of involvement in the internet purchase decision process. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 18(2), 15-40.
  18. Y. Kang, M. Kim, G. Lee, D. Jung, & R.-w. Ma. (2012). A study of social support, loneliness, sleep quality, and perceived health status among community-dwelling older adults. Journal of Korean Public Health Nursing, 26(2), 303-313. https://doi.org/10.5932/JKPHN.2012.26.2.303
  19. N. J. Pender. (1987). Health Promotion in Nursing Practice (2nd ed.). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
  20. J. Jung, & D. Lee. (2012). A Study on Frame Effect in Elaboration Likelihood Perspective: Focusing on the Cancer Related News. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 56(6), 278-309, 425.
  21. Y. Kim, H. Lee, Y. Jang, & H. Lee. (2016). A Cluster Analysis on the Risk of Particulate Matter : Focusing on Differences of Risk Perceptions and Risk-Related Behaviors based on Public Segmentation. Journal of Public Relations, 20(3), 201-235. https://doi.org/10.15814/jpr.2016.20.3.201
  22. J. Joo. (2012). Differences of purchasing luxury brand between female and male : Focusing on conspicuous consumption and influence of reference group. Advertising Research, (94), 70-93.