DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Accuracy for Autorefraction according to Measuring methods

측정방식에 따른 자동굴절검사의 정확도 비교

  • 정연홍 (국제대학교 안경광학과)
  • Received : 2018.05.28
  • Accepted : 2018.08.03
  • Published : 2018.08.31

Abstract

In this study, the performance between subjective refraction and open-field/closed view autorefraction was estimated. We measured the refractive error of early adults aged 18 to 20 years who did not have eye disease. The differences between measurements obtained by subjective refraction and open-field autorefraction for SE, J0, and J45 were $-0.13{\pm}0.53D$ (p=0.17), $+0.33{\pm}0.68D$ (p=0.01), and $+0.13{\pm}0.68D$ (p=0.26), respectively, with only J0 differing significantly. The differences between the measurements of subjective refraction and closed-view autorefraction for SE, J0, and J45 were $-0.30{\pm}0.42D$ (p=0.00), $+0.30{\pm}0.71D$ (p=0.02), and $-0.02{\pm}0.63D$ (p=0.88), respectively, with only SE and J0 differing significantly. The coefficient of accuracy for SE, J0, and J45 components of open-field and closed-view autorefraction were 1.04, 1.33, and 1.34 and 0.83, 1.40, and 1.24, respectively. It is possible to predict the refractive error, which is necessary when deciding on subjective refraction, by measuring the objective refraction of open-field/closed view autorefractors.

본 연구는 타각적 굴절검사에 의한 굴절이상도를 분석하여 현재 임상에서 사용되고 있는 개방형 자동굴절력계와 내부형 자동굴절력계의 성능을 평가하고자 하였다. 시력교정 및 안질환이 없는 만 18세 이상~20세 이하(평균 $19.84{\pm}0.54$세) 초기성인을 대상으로 포롭터를 활용한 자각적 굴절검사와 개방형 자동굴절력계 그리고 내부형 자동굴절력계의 순서로 굴절이상을 검사하였다. 자각적 굴절검사와 개방형 자동굴절검사의 Power vector 성분 SE, $J_0$, $J_{45}$의 상관관계는 r=0.92(p=0.00), r=0.14(p=0.43), r=0.12(p=0.47)이고 내부형 자동굴절검사는 r=0.98(p=0.00), r=0.21(p=0.22), r=0.08(p=0.65)으로 SE 성분은 통계적으로 매우 유의한 양적 상관성을 나타냈다. 그리고 SE, $J_0$, $J_{45}$ 성분에 대한 차이의 평균은 $-0.13{\pm}0.53D$(p=0.17), $+0.33{\pm}0.68D$(p=0.01), $+0.13{\pm}0.68D$(p=0.26)로 $J_0$ 성분만 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였고 내부형 자동굴절검사와의 SE, $J_0$, $J_{45}$ 차이값은 $-0.30{\pm}0.42D$(p=0.00), $+0.30{\pm}0.71D$(p=0.02), $-0.02{\pm}0.63D$(p=0.88)로 SE, $J_0$ 성분에서 유의한 차이가 있었다. 정확도계수와 신뢰구간은 자각적 굴절검사와 개방형 자동굴절검사에서 SE, $J_0$, $J_{45}$ 성분이 1.04(+0.91~-1.17D), 1.33(+1.66~-1.00D), 1.34(+1.46~-1.20D)이고 내부형 자동굴절검사와는 0.83(+0.52~-1.12D), 1.40(+1.69~-1.09D), 1.24(+1.21~-1.25D)로 분석되었다. 시력검사에 활용되는 개방형 내부형 자동굴절력계에 의한 측정결과는 자각적 굴절검사의 굴절이상도를 처방하는데 예비시력 검사기기로 가능하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Compilation Committee "Optometric Instrumentation", 2nd ed. Daihakseorim, Seoul, pp.219-255, 2000.
  2. Y. H. Jeong, "The Correlation of Tear Break-Up Time according to Corneal Refractive Power", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol.14, No.6, pp.2839-2843. 2013. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2013.14.6.2839
  3. K. Zadnik, D. O. Mutti, A. J. Adams, "The repeatability of measurements of the ocular components", Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol.33, No.7, pp.2325-2333, 1992.
  4. M. Farook, J. Venkatramani, G. Gazzard, A. Cheng, D. Tan, S. M. Saw, "Comparisons of the Handheld Autorefractor, Table-Mounted Autorefractor, and Subjective Refraction in Singapore Adults", Optometry and Vision Science, Vol.82, No.12, pp.1066-1070, 2005. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.opx.0000192344.72997.7c
  5. A. A. Martinez, A. Pandian, P. Sankaridurg, K. Rose, S. C. Huynh, P. Mitchell, "Comparison of Aberrometer and Autorefractor Measures of Refractive Error in Children", Optometry and Vision Science, Vol.83, No.11, pp.811-817, 2006. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.opx.0000238708.74276.6c
  6. Andrew, K. Caroline. C, "Clinical optics and refraction: A guide for optometrists, contact lens opticians and dispensing opticians", 1st ed. Butterworth-Heinemann, London, pp.170-171, 2007.
  7. H. S. Kim, H. S. Kim, H. Lee, "A Comparison of Subjective Refraction and Autorefractions", The Korean Journal of Vision Science, Vol.12, No.4, pp.283-290, 2010.
  8. M. A. Bullimore, R. E. Fusaro, C. W. Adams, "The repeatability of automated and clinician refraction", Optometry and Vision Science, Vol.75, No.8, pp.617-622, 1998. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199808000-00028
  9. K. Pesudovs, H. S. Weisinger, "A comparison of autorefractor performance", Optometry and Vision Science, Vol.81, No.7, pp.554-558, 2004. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200407000-00018
  10. J. D. Kim, I. H. Lee, J. H. Hwang, J. S. Kim, T. H. Kim, "An Inverstigation of Korean Opticians' Thinking to Objective Refraction Need", The Korean Journal of Vision Science, Vol.14, No.4, pp.222-254, 2010.
  11. L. N. Davies, E. A. Mallen, J. S. Wolffsohn, B. Gilmartin, "Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor", Optometry and Vision Science, Vol.80, No.4, pp.320-324, 2003. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200304000-00011
  12. J. Gwiazda, C. Weber, "Comparison of Spherical Equivalent Refraction and Astigmatism Measured with Three Different Models of Autorefractors", Optometry and Vision Science, Vol.81, No.1, pp.56-61, 2004. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200401000-00011
  13. T. Dave, Y. Fukuma, "Clinical evaluation of the Topcon BV-1000 automated subjective refraction system", Optometry and Vision Science, Vol.81, No.5, pp.323-333, 2004. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.opx.0000134906.98403.c3
  14. C. H. Won, M. A. Jung, K. C Mah, "The analysis of the clinical performance of the PRK-5000 auto ref-keratometer", Korean J Vis Sci. Vol.7, No.1 pp.13-25, 2005.
  15. K. C Mah, S. J. Kim, H. J. Lee, "The Analysis of the Clinical Performance of the URK-700 Autorefractor", Korean J Vis Sci., Vol.8, No.2, 87-96, 2006.
  16. L. N. Thibos, W. Wheeler, D. Horner, "Power Vectors: An Application of Fourier Analysis to the Description and Statistical Analysis of Refractive Error", Optometry and Vision Science, Vol.74, No.6, pp.367-375, 1997. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199706000-00019
  17. D. K. Han, J. M. Kim, K. J. Lee, "Comparison of accuracy of the KR-8100P, Nvision K-5001, and KR-1W", The Korean Journal of Vision Science, Vol.18, No.4, pp.435-445, 2016. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17337/JMBI.2016.18.4.435
  18. J. M. Bland, D. G. Altman, "Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement", The Lancet, Vol.327, No.8476, pp.307-310, 1986. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
  19. G. E. McCaghrey, F. E. Matthews, "Clinical evaluation of a range of autorefractors", Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, Vol.13, No.2, pp.129-137, 1993. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.1993.tb00441.x