한국도서관정보학회지 (Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society)

한국도서관정보학회 (Korean Library and Information Science Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

독서·정보·ICT·디지털 리터러시의 개념화 모델 개발 연구

A Study on the Development of Conceptualization Model for Reading, Information, ICT, and Digital Literacy

  • 투고 : 2018.05.20
  • 심사 : 2018.06.20
  • 발행 : 2018.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 리터러시 및 독서 정보 ICT 디지털 리터러시의 개념을 고찰하고 정의하여 이들 리터러시의 개념적 차이를 통한 독서 정보 ICT 디지털 리터러시의 개념화 모델을 개발하는 데 있다. 동시대의 사회적이고 문화적이며 정보기술의 발전에 따른 현상을 설명하는 개념으로 컴퓨터 리터러시가 등장하였으며, 이후 컴퓨터 리터러시는 IT와 ICT 리터러시로 그리고 디지털 리터러시로 변화되어 왔다. 연구결과로, 매체의 기술적 변화에 따라 용어가 변화되어 온 이들 리터러시를 매체 중심적 리터러시로 분류하였고, 텍스트나 정보를 이해하고 활용하고 평가하는 인지적 과정에 초점을 둔 독서 리터러시와 정보 리터러시를 과정 중심적 리터러시로 분류하여 독서 정보 ICT 디지털 리터러시의 개념화 모델을 개발하였다. 디지털 환경에서도 독서나 정보 리터러시는 매체에서 드러난 텍스트를 비판적으로 사고하고 평가하는 핵심적인 역량으로 독자들의 독서 및 정보 격차를 줄일 수 있는 방법에 대한 관심과 연구가 더욱 필요하다.

The purpose of this study is to develop conceptualization models of reading, information, ICT, and digital literacy through conceptual differences of these literacy by reviewing and defining the concepts of literacy as well as reading, information, ICT, and digital literacy. Computer literacy has emerged as a concept that explains the phenomenon of contemporary social, cultural, and information technology development, and since then, computer literacy has since changed to IT, ICT literacy, and digital literacy. As a result of the study, a conceptualization model of the reading, information, ICT, and digital literacy was developed. In this model, these literacy whose terms have changed according to the technological development of media, have been classified as medium-centered literacy. And reading and information literacy that focuses on the cognitive process of understanding, utilizing, and evaluating texts and information is categorized as process-oriented literacy. In the digital environment, reading and information literacy is a core competence to critically think and evaluate the texts that are on media, and further research is needed to reduce the reading and the information gap among readers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Education. 2015. General Curriculum for Elementary and Secondary School. Notice 2015-74, Separate Volume of Five
  2. Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development. 2005. Revision and Manual of ICT Instruction Management Guide for Elementary and Secondary Schools. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development
  3. Ku, Jaok. 2015. A Study on the Improvement of ICT Use Education Environment through the Analysis of PISA 2012 Computer Based Assessment Results. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation
  4. Kim, Kapsu. 2017. A Study on ICT Usability and Availability of Between Korean Students and OECD Students : Focus on PISA 2015. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 21(3): 361-370. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.21.3.361
  5. Kim, Soojung. 2015. "Research Trends of Information Literacy Instruction in the Library and Information Science Field." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 26(3): 207-239. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2015.26.3.207
  6. Kim, Seong-Hee and Hyung-Mi Lee. 2009. "The Study on the Digital Media Literacy for Knowledge Sharing." Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 40(1): 47-67.
  7. Kim, Youngae and Junghee Seo. 2011. Results and Implications of ICT Literacy Level Measurement for Elementary and Secondary Students in 2010. Seoul: Korea Education and Research Information Service.
  8. Kim, Hye-Sook. 2012. "The Impact of ICT use on Students' Academic Performance based on PISA 2009 Korean Data." Asian journal of education, 13(1): 1-22.
  9. Kim, Hye-Sook. 2014. The Influence of ICT Utilization on Academic Performance. Daegu: Korea Education Research Information Service.
  10. Kim, Hye-Sook and Sunghee Jin. 2006. ICT literacy evaluation and implications of ETS. Seoul: Korea Education Research Information Service.
  11. Na, Eun Yeong. 1994. "A Review of Current Research on Attitudes and Attitude Change:1985-1994." The Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 8(2): 3-33.
  12. Park, Sung-Youl. 2005. "LISREL Analyses of Vocational High School Teachers' Computer Literacy with Their Daily Computer Use Time, Computer Experience Years, Age, and Educational Levels." Journal of Agricultural Education and Human Resource Development, 37(2): 73-87.
  13. Park, Juhyeon. 2016. A Study on the Development of Reading Attitude Survey for Children. Ph.D. diss., Department of Library and Information Science, Chonnam National University.
  14. Park, Ju-Hyeon and Myoung-Gyu Lee. 2015. "A Study on the Development of a Model for Attitude toward Reading." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 46(4): 271-297. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.201512.271
  15. Park, Ju-Hyeon and Woo-Kwon Chang. 2014. "Analysis of PISA 2009 Impacts of School Library Level Variables on Academic Achievement." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(3): 331-351. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.331
  16. Park, Hyun-Jeong, Yeojin Ha and Min-Ho Park. 2011. "Application of the mixture modeling to the student characteristics and reading achievement according to the patterns of ICT use." Journal of Educational Evaluation, 24(3): 733-754.
  17. Park, Hye-young. 2017. "Investigation of Trends on PISA Assessment Framework in Reading." Korean Language Education, 157: 259-283.
  18. Bae, Kyung-Jae and Hee-Jin Park. 2013. "A Study on the Current Condition and the Improvement of Digital Literacy Education." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 44(2): 241-265. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.2.201306.241
  19. Baek, Sun-Geun. 2009a. "The Development of Standardized ICT Literacy Assessment for Secondary School Student." Asian journal of education, 10(1): 175-198. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2009.10.1.008
  20. Baek, Sun-Geun. 2009b. "An Evaluation Study on the ICT Literacy of Secondary School Students in South Korea." Asian journal of education, 10(2): 383-406. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2009.10.2.012
  21. Byun, Woo-Yeoul. 2003. "Some Suggestions on Reading Education in the Knowledge-Information Society." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 34(1): 1-17.
  22. Byun, Woo-Yeoul and Gi-Ho Song. 2014. "Development of Reading Strategies to Learn for Integrating Reading and Writing through Creative Writing." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 45(1): 125-147. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.45.1.201403.125
  23. Suh, Soonshik. et al. 2009. "Developing and Validating ICT Literacy Test for Elementary School Students." Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3): 193-220. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.25.3.193
  24. Song, Kyeong-Jin. 2016. "Literacy is a term with two faces that are difficult but universal." World Library, 300. [인용 2018. 1. 5].
  25. Song, Kyeong-Jin and Mikyeong Cha. 2014. "A Study on the Concept of Literacy in Library and Information Science and in Public Library Services." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 48(4): 215-240.
  26. Song, Miyoung. et al. 2014. Plan on the Improvement of Students' Capacity in Korea through the Analysis of the PISA 2012 Results. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  27. Yang, Jung-Ho. 2012. "Effects of High School ICT Activities on Students' Digital Literacy in Korea." Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2): 347-369. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.28.2.347
  28. Yoo, In-Hwan. 2000. Development of an information curriculum model based on integration of ICT(Information and Communication Technology) and problem solving process. Ph. D. diss., Elementary Computer Education, Korea National University of Education.
  29. Lee, Kyeong-Hwa and Gi-Ho Song. 2016. "A Study on Development of Libraries' Information Literacy Program based on Integrated Tasks to Support the Free Semester System." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 27(4): 85-104. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2016.27.4.085
  30. Lee, Seong-Young. 2009. "On Attitude in Reading Education - The Probability of Teaching Reading Attitude." Journal of Reading Research, 21: 285-318.
  31. Lee, Soo-Won and Jun-Ho Lee. 1997. "The Structural Differences of Attitudes Formed through Central and Peripheral Routes." The Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 11(2): 75-93.
  32. Lee, Byeong-Ki. 2008. "A Study on the Categorization of Reading Strategies for Reading Instruction in School Library." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 39(3): 139-159. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2005.39.3.139
  33. Lee, Byeong-Ki. 2011. "A Study on the Developmental Tools of Performance Task for Information Literacy Instruction." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(4): 31-50. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.4.201112.31
  34. Lee, Byeong-Ki. 2012. "The Comparative Analysis of PISA Reading Domain and AASL Standards for the 21st-Century Learner." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 43(3): 193-216. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.3.201209.193
  35. Lee, Byeong-Ki. 2013. "A Study on the Development and Validation of the Information Literacy Test by Guilford's Structure of Intellect Model." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(2): 181-200.
  36. Lee, Jun. et al. 2002. Study on Standardization and Curriculum of Student's ICT Literacy Standard. Seoul: Korea Education and Research Information Service.
  37. Lee, Taewook. 2001. A Study on the Teaching and Learning Methods for ICT Utilization. Seoul: Korea Education & Research Information Service.
  38. Jang, Sangsoo. 2012. PISA 2000-2009 Results Analysis : Korea. Seoul: National Assembly Research Service.
  39. Chang, Yunkeum. et al. 2016. "A Study on the Public Library As a Place of ICT Literacy Training." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 27(3): 273-294. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2016.27.3.273
  40. Jung, Youngmi. 2018. "A Study on Digital Literacy Education for Adults in US Public Libraries." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(1): 359-380.
  41. Jeong, Hyeon-Seon. 2004. "Conceptualising Digital Literacy in Korean Language Education." Korean language education research, 21: 5-43.
  42. Choi, Jae-Hwang. 2016. "Considering Core Ideas of ACRL Information Literacy 'Framework (2015)'." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(3): 171-191. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.3.171
  43. School Library Board of Curriculum. 2007. Library and Information Life Curriculum Standards. Seoul: Korea Library Association.
  44. National Information Society Agency. 2018. The Report on the Digital Divide 2017. Seoul: Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning.
  45. Hahn, Jung-Sun. 2006. A Study on Developing Digital Literacy Competency Index - Measurement Tool for Elementary and Secondary School Students in Korea. Seoul: Korea Education Research Information Service.
  46. AASL. 2007. Standards for the 21st-Century Learner. Chicago: AASL.
  47. AASL. 2018. National School Library Standards for Learners, School Librarians and School Libraries. Chicago: ALA.
  48. AASL and AECT. 1998. Information Power : Building Partnerships for Learning. Chicago: ALA.
  49. ACRL. 2000. Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Chicago, IL: ACRL.
  50. ACRL. 2012. Task Force Recommendations. Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries.
  51. ACRL. 2016. Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Chicago, IL:Association of College and Research Libraries. [cited 2018. 3. 25].
  52. ALA Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. 1989. Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report. [cited 2018. 5. 1].
  53. ALA and AECT. 1998. Information Power: Guidelines for School Library Media Programs. Chicago: ALA.
  54. ALA. 2013. Digital Literacy, Libraries, and Public Policy: Report of the Office for Information Technology Policy's Digital Literacy Task Force. [cited 2018. 3. 5].
  55. Bennett, S. and K. Maton. 2010. "Beyond the 'digital natives' debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students' technology experiences." Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5): 321-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x
  56. Bruce, B. C. and J. K. Peyton. 1999. "Literacy Development in Network-Based Classrooms: Innovation and Realizations." International Journal of Educational Technology, 1. [cited 2018. 5. 1].
  57. Carey, James O. 1998. "Library Skills, Information Skills, and Information Literacy: Implications for Teaching and Learning." School Library Media Research, 1:1-20.
  58. Collins, J. and R. Blot. 2003. Literacy and Literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge publications.
  59. Davies, J. E., M. Szabo and C. Montgomerie. 2002. Assessing Information and Communication Technology Literacy of Education Undergraduates: Instrumental Development. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 476992
  60. Erwin, Phil. 2001. Attitudes and persuasion. NY: Psychology Press.
  61. Eshet-Alkali, Y. and Y. Amichai-Hamburger. 2004. "Experiments in digital literacy." CyberPsychology and Behavior, 7(4): 421-429. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2004.7.421
  62. ETS. 2002. Digital Transformation: A Framework for ICT Literacy, a Report of the International ICT Literacy Panel. [cited 2018. 5. 14].
  63. Gardiner, W. Lambert. 1997. "Can Computers Turn Teaching Inside-Out, Transform Education, and Redefine Literacy?" In: Robert Kubey. ed. Media Literacy in the Information Age: Current Perspectives, pp. 359-376. New Brunswick:Transaction Publishers.
  64. Gee, J. P. 1989. "Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: introduction." Journal of Education, 171(1): 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748917100101
  65. Gilster, P. 1997. Digital Literacy. New York: Wiley Computer Publications.
  66. Heath, S. B. 1983. Ways with Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  67. Hjorland, Birger. 2008. "Information Literacy and Digital Literacy." Prisma.com, 7:4-15.
  68. International Literacy Association. 2018. What's Hot in Literacy-2018 Report. [cited 2018. 4. 1].
  69. Kang, M. and H. P. Byun. 2001. "A Conceptual Framework for a Web-based Knowledge Construction Support System." Educational Technology, 41(4): 48-53.
  70. Koltay, T. 2011. "The media and the literacies: Media Literacy, Information Literacy, Digital Literacy." Media, Culture and Society, 33(2): 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710393382
  71. Leu, D. J. et al. 2015. "The New Literacies of Online Research and Comprehension: Rethinking the Reading Achievement Gap." Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1): 37-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.85
  72. Martin, A. and J. Grudziecki. 2006. "DigEuLit: Concepts and Tools for Digital Literacy Development." ITALICS: Innovations in Teaching & Learning in Information & Computer Sciences, 5(4): 246-264.
  73. Mathewson, G. C. 1994. "Model of Attitude Influence Upon Reading and Learning to Read." In: R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, and H. Singer. ed. 4th ed. Theoretical Models and Process of Reading. Delaware: International Reading Association.
  74. NRC. 1999. Being Fluent with Information Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
  75. OECD. 2000. Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills: The PISA 2000 Assessment of Reading, Mathematical and Scientific Literacy. Paris: OECD.
  76. OECD. 2005. The Definition And Selection of Key Competencies: Executive Summary. [cited 2018. 5. 18].
  77. OECD. 2010a. PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: OECD.
  78. OECD. 2010b. PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do-Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science(Volume I). Paris: OECD.
  79. OECD. 2011. PISA 2009 Results: Students on Line: Digital Technologies and Performance. Volume IV. [cited 2018. 4. 8].
  80. OECD. 2012. PISA 2009 Technical Report. [cited 2018. 4. 3].
  81. OECD. 2016. PISA 2018 Draft Analytical Frameworks May 2016. [cited 2018. 4. 3].
  82. Oxford University Press. 2018. Oxford Dictionaries. [cited 2018. 4. 1].
  83. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. 2000. Learning for the 21st Century: A Report and Mile Guide for 21st Century Skills. [cited 2018. 5. 3].
  84. Petty, R. E. and J. T. Cacioppo. 1986. Communication and Persuation : Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  85. Prensky. 2001. "Digital natives, Digital immigrants." On the Horizon, 9(5): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
  86. SCONUL Working Group on Information Literacy. 2011. The SCONUL Seven Pillars of Information Literacy - Core Model for Higher Education. [cited 2018. 4. 25].
  87. Tyner, Kathleen. 1998. Literacy in a Digital World: Teaching and Learning in the Age of Information. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
  88. UNESCO. 2005. Education for All Global Monitoring Report: Education for All Literacy for Life. France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
  89. Williams, R. 1997. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  90. Wilson, A. A. 2008. "Learning from Past and Present Uses of the Term Literacy." In: G. Hurby. ed. American Reading Forum Annual Yearbook, 27.
  91. Zurkowski, Paul G. 1974. The Information Service Environment: Relationships and Priorities. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science. Related Pater No. 5. [cited 2018. 5. 17].

피인용 문헌

  1. PISA 2018 독서 리터러시 평가틀 분석을 통한 디지털 정보 서비스 방안 탐색 vol.55, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2021.55.1.135