DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

주민자치와의 협력을 통한 한국형 공공도서관 실행공동체 활성화 방안 연구

Strategies for Improving Communities of Practice in Korea by Cooperating with Residents Autonomy

  • 투고 : 2018.05.20
  • 심사 : 2018.06.18
  • 발행 : 2018.06.30

초록

이 연구는 지역사회를 실행공동체로 환원시키기 위한 매개자인 공무원의 협력가능성을 모색하는 데 그 목적이 있다. 공동체는 가치지향적인 개념으로 현대사회에서는 지역공동체, 실행공동체, 공동체성을 가진 조직 등으로 존재한다. 공공도서관 공동체는 지역공동체의 성격과 실행공동체의 성격을 동시에 띠며, 지역사회 문제해결을 위해 서비스 영역을 확장하고 있다. 그러나 한국에서는 동 단위의 주민자치에서 지역사회 문제해결을 위한 공공서비스를 제공하고 있다. 이들은 모두 지역사회를 실행공동체로 환원시킨다는 목적을 가지고 업무를 수행한다. 따라서 이 연구는 공동체의 매개자에게 필요한 공동체 의식, 업무 필요성에 대한 의식을 조사하였다. 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 공동체 의식이 높은 집단이 그렇지 않은 집단에 비해 업무협력에 대한 필요를 덜 느끼는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 공동체 의식이 높거나 주민자치 업무에 많이 노출된 집단은 직무기대가 낮은 편으로 나타났다. 따라서 공동체에 관련된 업무를 원활하게 협력하기 위해서 공동체 업무에 대한 적극적인 동기부여가 필요할 것이다.

The study is to find the possibility of cooperation between civil servants as a mediators for changing a society in a region into community of practice. "Community" is the value-oriented concept and exists in a local community, a community of practice and a organization that have the characteristic of "Community." Public libraries as "Community" have both characteristics of local community and community of practice. And public libraries as community gives public services for neighborhood region problem-solving to people. But in Korea, Residents autonomy system in Dong gives the service to people. They all conducts the business for changing a society in a region to community of Practice. Therefore the study conducted a survey about sense of community and necessity of cooperation in the business. The results are following: The group of higher awareness on community feels less needs to corporate the work in community than the group of lower awareness on community; The group of higher awareness on community or the group having more experience on community have lower job satisfaction. Therefore the motivation on working for community is needed for the mediator.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. The Citizen Union for Open Society. 2017a. 16th National Residents Autonomy Expo Sangmu2-dong(Gwangju Seogu) - . [cited 2018. 3. 2].
  2. The Citizen Union for Open Society. 2017b. 16th National Residents Autonomy Expo Kumho 1-dong(Gwangju Seogu). - [cited 2018. 3. 2].
  3. The Citizen Union for Open Society. 2017c. 16th National Residents Autonomy Expo Il-dong(Gyeonggi-do Ansan). - [cited 2018. 3. 2].
  4. The Citizen Union for Open Society. 2017d. 16th National Residents Autonomy Expo Namchon-dong(Gyeonggi-do Osan). - [cited 2018. 3. 2].
  5. The Citizen Union for Open Society. 2017e. 16th National Residents Autonomy Expo - [인용 2018. 3. 2].
  6. The Citizen Union for Open Society. 2017f. 16th National Residents Autonomy Expo - Simgogbon-Dong(Gyeonggi-do Bucheon). [cited 2018. 3. 2].
  7. "100 region will be selected as 2018 Urban Regeneration New Deal Project." 2017. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. April 24.
  8. Kwak, Hyon-Kun. 2017. "the Conceptualization of Local Government by Reinterpreting Residents Autonomy as Fundamentals of Local Self-Government and Constructing System Model." Modern Society and Public Administration, 27(2): 1-29.
  9. National Library of Korea eds. 2017. 2017 Library Advancement Cases and Articles. Seoul: National Library of Korea.
  10. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. 2018. A Guideline for Registration of Urban Regeneration New Deal Project. [cited 2018. 5. 2].
  11. Kim, Mi-Young. 2015. "Community Reality in High Modern Society." Society and Theory, 27: 181-218. https://doi.org/10.17209/st.2015.11.27.181
  12. Kim, Kyung-Joon. and Kim Sung-Soo. 1998. A Study on the Residents' Sense of Community in Korea. Community Development Review, 23(2), 211-232.
  13. Kim, Byong-Joon. 2015. Local Self-Government. 2nd ed. Paju: Beopmoonsa.
  14. Kim, Haklin. 2017. A Study on the Effect of the Participation of Community Mediation Activities on Sense of Community: Focusing on the Experience of Kwang-Ju Community Mediation Center. Dispute Resolution Studies Review, 15(1):107-136. https://doi.org/10.16958/drsr.2017.15.1.107
  15. Kim, Hyung-Ho. 2014. "A Study on Local Reading Community." Proceedings of 2013 Autumn Joint Conference of Research Group for Global Korean Business & Culture in Jeonnam National University, 117-137
  16. Urban Regeneration Information System. 2014. Urban Regeneration Bellwether Region. [cited 2018. 2. 24.]
  17. Park, Seong-Woo. 2016. "A Study on the Changing Role of Public Libraries by the Case Studies of Community of Practice." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(4): 339-358. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.4.201612.339
  18. Park, Seong-Woo. 2018. A "Study on the Formation Process and Sustainability of Community of Practice in Public Libraries." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 52(1): 113-131. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2018.52.1.113
  19. Park, Yeong-Sook. 2003. "People making community culture in small library." Territory, 260: 132-137.
  20. Seo, Jae-Ho. 2013. A Study on the Participation of Local Autonomous Activities and Sense of Community - Based on the Survey of Citizens Who are Living in the Bound ary of 4 Community Centers in Busan M etropolitan City - . Korean Society and Public Administration, 24(2): 437-459.
  21. "Suncheon resident autonomy is selected as best practice 9 years in a raw." 2013. Suncheon Agoranews. November 6.
  22. Yang, Young-Kyun. 2012. "the Formation of Urban Community and Small Libraries: A case of Youngin." Korean Studies Quarterly, 35(2): 35-67.
  23. Lee, Jong-Soo. 2015. Communities: From Utophia to Making Community Design. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
  24. Cho, Yoon-Hee. 2012. "A Study on a Model of the Small Library for the Formation of a Community Culture." Digital Library, 66: 3-22.
  25. Korea Research Institution for Local Government & Community Affairs. 2013. Let's Do Local Government. Seoul: DaeYoung Co.
  26. Han, Sang-Il. 2003. Different Types of American Neighborhood Participation " and the Implications for Korean Citizen Participation." Korean Republic Administration Review, 37(3): 159-180.
  27. A Community Science Project. 2007. Sense of Community Index(SCI). [cited 2018. 6. 13].
  28. American Library Association. 2015. Case Studies: Libraries Transforming Communities. [cited 2016. 9. 10].
  29. American Library Association. 2016b. LTC Models for Change: Dialogue & Deliberation Resources. [cited 2018. 2. 24].
  30. Belzowski, Nora. F., Parker J Ladwig. and Thurston Miller. 2013. "Crafting Identity, Collaboration, and Relevance for Academic Librarians Using Communities of Practice." Collaborative Librarianship, 5(1): 3-15.
  31. Gusfield, Joseph. R. 1975. The community: A critical response. New York: Harper Colophon. American Library Association.
  32. American Library Association. 2016a. About Libraries Transforming Communities (LTC). [cited 2018. 2. 24].
  33. Henrick, Kristin J. and Ramirose Attebury. 2010. "Communities of Practice at an Academic Library: A New Approach to Mentoring at the University of Idaho." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(2): 158-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2010.01.007
  34. Koliba, Christopher. and Rebecca Gajda. 2009. "Communities of Practice as an Analytical Construct: Implications for Theory and Practice." Journal of Public Administration, 32: 97-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690802385192
  35. Lave, Jean. and Etienne Wenger. 2010. 상황 학습: 합법적 주변 참여. 손민호 옮김. 서울:강현출판사.
  36. McMillan, David. W. and Chavis, David. M. 1986. "Sense of Community: A Definition and Theory." Journal of Community Psychology. 14: 6-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I
  37. Pemberton, Jon., Sharon Mavin and Brenda Stalker. 2007. "Scratching beneath the surface of communities of (mal)practice." The Learning Organization, 14(1): 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470710718357
  38. Scott, Rachel. 2011. "The Role of Public Libraries in Community Building." Public Library Quarterly, 30: 191-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2011.599283
  39. The Harwood Institute for Public Innovation. 2015. Communities have Challenge. Libraries can Help: A Step-by-step Guide to "Turning Outward" To your Community. [cited 2016. 9. 23.]
  40. Thompson, Edmund. R. and Phua. Florence. T. T. 2012. "A Brief Index of Affective Job Satisfaction." Group & Organization Management, 37(3): 275-307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111434201
  41. Wenger, Etienne C. and William M. Snyder. 2000. "Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier." Harvard Business Review, January-February: 139-145.
  42. Wenger-Trayner, Etienne. and Beverly Wenger-Trayner. 2015. Introduce to communities of practice. [cited 2016. 11. 11].
  43. Wyk, Johann Van. 2005. "Communities of Practice in an academic library: a run on the wild side?" 5th ICAHIS Conference at Onderstepoort, University of Pretoria, South Africa, 97-102.