The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accuracy of provisional crowns made using stereolithography apparatus and subtractive technique

  • Kang, Seen-Young (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Park, Jung-Hyun (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Woong-Chul (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
  • Received : 2017.12.14
  • Accepted : 2018.08.22
  • Published : 2018.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. To compare and analyze trueness and precision of provisional crowns made using stereolithography apparatus and subtractive technology. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Digital impressions were made using a master model and an intraoral scanner and the crowns were designed with CAD software; in total, 22 crowns were produced. After superimposing CAD design data and scan data using a 3D program, quantitative and qualitative data were obtained for analysis of trueness and precision. Statistical analysis was performed using normality test combined with Levene test for equal variance analysis and independent sample t-test. Type 1 error was set at 0.05. RESULTS. Trueness for the outer and inner surfaces of the SLA crown (SLAC) were $49.6{\pm}9.3{\mu}m$ and $22.5{\pm}5.1{\mu}m$, respectively, and those of the subtractive crown (SUBC) were $31.8{\pm}7.5{\mu}m$ and $14.6{\pm}1.2{\mu}m$, respectively. Precision values for the outer and inner surfaces of the SLAC were $18.7{\pm}6.2{\mu}m$ and $26.9{\pm}8.5{\mu}m$, and those of the SUBC were $25.4{\pm}3.1{\mu}m$ and $13.8{\pm}0.6{\mu}m$, respectively. Trueness values for the outer and inner surfaces of the SLAC and SUBC showed statistically significant differences (P<.001). Precision for the inner surface showed significance (P<.03), whereas that for the outer surface showed no significance (P<.58). CONCLUSION. The study demonstrates that provisional crowns produced by subtractive technology are superior to crowns fabricated by stereolithography in terms of accuracy.

Keywords

References

  1. Nejatidanesh F, Lotfi HR, Savabi O. Marginal accuracy of interim restorations fabricated from four interim autopolymerizing resins. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:364-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.030
  2. Karaokutan I, Sayin G, Kara O. In vitro study of fracture strength of provisional crown materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:27-31. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.1.27
  3. Ferracane J. Elution of leachable components from composites. J Oral Rehabil 1994;21:441-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1994.tb01158.x
  4. Young HM, Smith CT, Morton D. Comparative in vitro evaluation of two provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:129-32. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.112797
  5. Poticny DJ, Klim J. CAD/CAM in-office technology: Innovations after 25 years for predictable, esthetic outcomes. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:5S-9S. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0356
  6. Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:555-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.002
  7. Kim CM, Kim SR, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Trueness of milled prostheses according to number of ball-end mill burs. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:624-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.014
  8. Kim DY, Lee HN, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in single and three-unit metal frameworks made by micro-stereolithography. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:239-43. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.239
  9. Van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
  10. Braian M, Jimbo R, Wennerberg A. Production tolerance of additive manufactured polymeric objects for clinical applications. Dent Mater 2016;32:853-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.020
  11. Koch GK, Gallucci GO, Lee SJ. Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:749-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.004
  12. ISO-12836. Digitizing devices for CAD/CAM systems for indirect dental restorations - Test methods for assessing accuracy. International Standards for Organization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. Available at: https://www.iso.org/iso/store.html.
  13. ISO-5725-1. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 1: General principles and definitions. International Standards for Organization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland, 1994. Available at: https://www.iso.org/ iso/store.html
  14. Kirsch C, Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. Trueness of four different milling procedures used in dental CAD/CAM systems. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:551-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1916-y
  15. Bosch G, Ender A, Mehl A. A 3-dimensional accuracy analysis of chairside CAD/CAM milling processes. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1425-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.012
  16. Schaefer O, Watts DC, Sigusch BW, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: A three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility. Dent Mater 2012;28:320-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.008
  17. Jeong ID, Kim WC, Park J, Kim CM, Kim JH. Ceramic molar crown reproducibility by digital workflow manufacturing: An in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:252-56. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.252
  18. Lee WS, Lee DH, Lee KB. Evaluation of internal fit of inter- im crown fabricated with CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing system. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:265-70. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.265
  19. Kim KB, Kim JH, Kim WC, Kim JH. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of three-unit fixed dental prostheses produced by stereolithography. Dent Mater J 2014;33:504-9. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-017
  20. Park JY, Bae SY, Lee JJ, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of three different dental prostheses: Comparison of the silicone replica technique and three-dimensional superimposition analysis. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:159-69. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.159
  21. Al-Imam, Hiba, M Gram. AR Benetti, K Gotfredsen. Accuracy of stereolithography additive casts used in a digital workflow. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119; 580-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.020
  22. Kim DY, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Reproducibility of different arrangement of resin copings by dental microstereolithography: Evaluating the marginal discrepancy of resin copings. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:260-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.007

Cited by

  1. Comparative Study of the Trueness of the Inner Surface of Crowns Fabricated from Three Types of Lithium Disilicate Blocks vol.9, pp.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091798
  2. Importance of interim restorations in the molar region vol.61, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.19-0102
  3. A Comparative Study of the Fitness and Trueness of a Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis Fabricated Using Two Digital Workflows vol.9, pp.14, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9142778
  4. Trueness of the Inner Surface of Monolithic Crowns Fabricated by Milling of a Fully Sintered (Y, Nb)-TZP Block in Chairside CAD-CAM System for Single-visit Dentistry vol.12, pp.19, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12193253
  5. 절삭 및 적층 가공법으로 제작된 3본 고정성 국소의치의 변연 및 내면 적합도에 관한 연구 vol.58, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2020.58.1.7
  6. 3D 프린팅용 광경화 수지를 사용하여 제작한 의치상용 인공치아의 항온수조 침적에 따른 변형률 비교 분석 vol.42, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2020.42.3.202
  7. 디지털 광 조명 방식으로 제작한 임시 크라운의 세척 시간에 따른 3차원 적합도 평가 vol.42, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2020.42.4.334
  8. Effect of rinsing time on the accuracy of interim crowns fabricated by digital light processing: An in vitro study vol.13, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.1.24
  9. Evaluating the accuracy (trueness and precision) of interim crowns manufactured using digital light processing according to post-curing time: An in vitro study vol.13, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.2.89
  10. Can polylactic acid be a CAD/CAM material for provisional crown restorations in terms of fit and fracture strength? vol.40, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2020-232
  11. Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance between CAD/CAM Materials for Interim Fixed Prosthesis vol.14, pp.24, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247791