DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Research on the Use of Faceted Navigation of KOLIS-NET

KOLIS-NET의 패싯 네비게이션 활용에 관한 연구

  • 윤정옥 (청주대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2019.01.16
  • Accepted : 2019.02.13
  • Published : 2019.02.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine and propose to improve the features of a simple keyword search box and faceted navigations of KOLIS-NET operated by the National Library of Korea. A record group of '2011-2020 (776)' under 'Publication date' facet, out of 3,702 records retrieved from a search of '김훈', were examined. Major findings are as follows: (1) Five facets including 'Format', 'Publication date', 'Subject', 'Language' and 'Country' are used to limit search results only in the first step, and multiple facets cannot be simultaneously used; (2) With 'Publication date' facet formed in the span of ten years, a separate publication year cannot be identified; (3) 'Subject' facet based on KDC limits the results only in broad subject classes without sub-facets; (4) Under 'Format' facet, a special format such as large print texts cannot be identified; (5) Without 'Author' facet, authors cannot be identified; and (6) 'Publication date missing', 'Language missing', and 'Miscellaneous subject' record groups cannot be clicked and displayed, a navigation to-and-fro between a brief list and bibliographic records is not smooth, etc. Therefore an application of multiple facets in all stages of limiting the search result, a construction of sub-facets for 'Publication date' and 'Subject' facets, an accurate description and coding of 'General Material Designation', etc. are suggested to improve KOLIS-NET's faceted navigation.

이 연구의 목적은 국립중앙도서관 KOLIS-NET의 단순 키워드 검색창과 패싯 네비게이션의 기능을 검토하고, 개선 방안을 제안하는 것이다. KOLIS-NET에서 '김훈'의 검색 결과 3,702건 중 '발행시기' 패싯의 '2011-2020 (776)' 레코드 그룹을 살펴보았다. 주요한 발견은 다음과 같다: (1) '자료유형', '발행시기', '주제별', '언어' 및 '발행국'의 5개 패싯은 검색 결과 첫 단계만 적용 및 복수 패싯의 교차 미적용; (2) 10년 단위 '발행시기' 패싯에서 개별 발행연도 미식별; (3) KDC의 10개 주류 및 '기타'로 구분된 '주제별' 패싯은 하위 패싯이 없어 주제 구체화 곤란; (4) '자료유형' 패싯의 '일반도서'에서 큰 활자 도서 등 특수 자료유형의 집합과 식별 곤란; (5) 저자 패싯 부재로 저자명으로 집합 및 식별 곤란; (6) '발행시기' 패싯의 '발행년불명', '언어' 패싯의 '언어불명' 및 '주제명' 패싯의 '기타' 그룹은 디스플레이 미작동, 서지 리스트와 개별 레코드 간 이동 불편 등 시스템 기능적 제한점. 이에 따라 원활한 패싯 네비게이션 위한 패싯 간 이동 개선, '발행시기' 패싯의 1년 단위 하위 패싯 및 '주제별' 패싯의 강목류 수준 하위 패싯 구성, 서지 레코드 작성 시 '자료유형표시'의 정확한 입력과 코딩 활용 및 OPAC 디스플레이 조정, 이름표목에 기반한 저자 패싯 추가 등 KOLIS-NET 시스템 기능성 및 레코드의 품질 개선을 제안하였다.

Keywords

MHJBB6_2019_v53n1_109_f0001.png 이미지

<그림 1> KOLIS-NET의 검색 결과 화면(부분)(검색: 2018.10.22)

MHJBB6_2019_v53n1_109_f0002.png 이미지

<그림 2> 『공터에서』의 간략서지 리스트(검색: 2018.10.30)

<표 1> 김훈 저작의 서지 레코드 사례(검색: 2018.10.30)

MHJBB6_2019_v53n1_109_t0001.png 이미지

<표 2> 『공터에서』의 KORMARC 서지 레코드(검색: 2018.10.30)

MHJBB6_2019_v53n1_109_t0002.png 이미지

References

  1. Kwak, Seung-Jin, Shin, Jae-Min and Kim, Bo-Young. 2016. "Comparative Study of Discovery Services." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 27(4): 5-20. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2016.27.4.005
  2. National Library of Korea. "260 Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint)." ORMARC-KORean Machine Readable Cataloging. [online] [cited 2018. 7. 29.]
  3. National Library of Korea. 2018a. KOLIS-NET. "Introduction." [online] [cited 2018. 7. 30.]
  4. National Library of Korea. 2018b. KOLIS-NET. "Cooperating Organizations." [online] [cited 2018. 7. 31.]
  5. National Library of Korea. 2018c. KOLIS-NET. "Announcements." [online] [cited 2018. 7. 31.]
  6. Kim, Sun-Ae and Lee, Soo-Sang. 2006. "Quality Evaluation of a Shared Cataloging DB: the Case of KOLIS-NET." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40(1): 95-117. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.1.095
  7. Kim, Young-Kee and Lee, Soo-Sang. 2006. "A Case Study on System Evaluation of the KOLIS-NET." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Management, 23(1): 261-278. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.1.261
  8. Kim, Woo-Jeong, Lee, Ji-Won and Cho, Yong-Wan. 2017. "A Study on Quality of Bibliographic Records for DVDs in University Libraries." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 28(4): 77-100. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2017.28.4.077
  9. Rho, Jee-Hyun and Lee, Soo-Sang. 2006. "Meanings and Values of KOLIS-NET in Public Libraries." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40(2): 195-216. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.2.195
  10. Doh, Tae-Hyeon and Jung, Young-Mi. 2013a. "A Study on the Next Generation OPAC Functionalities Diffusion Status and Adoption by Academic Libraries." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(2): 197-215. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.2.201306.197
  11. Doh, Tae-Hyeon and Jung, Young-Mi. 2013b. "A Study on the Factors of the Next Generation OPAC Functionalities Adoption in Academic Libraries." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(3): 471-488. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.3.201309.471
  12. Shim, Kyung. 2008. "A Case Study on the Next Generation Library Catalogs: WorldCat Local." Doseogwan Munhwa, 49(11): 54-61.
  13. Yoo, Yeong-Jun. 2011. "A Study on Faceted Navigation in Next-Generation Library Catalog." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Management, 28(3): 13-30. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.013
  14. Yoo, Yeong-Jun. 2013. "Analyzing Faceted Navigations of OPAC in Korean University Libraries."Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Management, 30(2): 189-205. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.2.189
  15. Yoo, Yeong-Jun. 2014. "A Study on Faceted Navigation of the Public Libraries." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 45(1): 339-358. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.45.1.201403.339
  16. Korean Library Association. Cataloging Committee. 2003. Korean Cataloging Rules. 4th ed. Seoul: Korean Library Association.
  17. Bilal, D. 2014. Library Automation: Core Concepts and Practical Systems Analysis. 3rd Ed. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited.
  18. Breeding, M. 2004. "Integrated Library Software: A Guide to Multiuser, Multifunction Systems." Library Technology Reports, 40(1): 1-42.
  19. Breeding, M. 2007. "Next Generation Catalog." Library Technology Reports, 44(4): 1-42.
  20. Breeding, M. 2013. "3. Next-Generation Discovery: An Overview of the European Scene." Catalogue 2.0: The Future of the Library Catalogue. Edited by Sally Chambers. London: Facet Publishing, 37-64.
  21. Caplan, P. 2012. "On Discovery Tools, OPACs and the Motion of Library Language." Library Hi Tech, 30(1): 108-115. [online] [cited 2018. 7. 24.]
  22. Hider, P. 2012. Information Resource Description: Creating and Managing Metadata. London: Facet Publishing.
  23. Hofmann, M. A. and Yang, S. Q. 2011. "How Next-Gen R U? A Review of Academic OPACS in the United States and Canada." Computers in Libraries, 31(6): 26-29.
  24. Nagy, A. 2011. "Defining the Next-Generation Catalog." Library Technology Reports, 47(7): 11-15.
  25. Yang, S. Q. and Hofmann, M. A. 2010. "The Next Generation Library Catalog: A Comparative Study of the OPACs of Koha, Evergreen, and Voyager." Information Technology and Libraries, 29(3): 141-150. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v29i3.3139
  26. Yang, S. Q. and Wagner, K. 2010. "Evaluating and Comparing Discovery Tools: How Close Are We Towards Next Generation Catalog?" Library Hi Tech, 28(4): 690-709. [online] [cited 2018. 7. 24.]
  27. Ward, J. L., Shadle, S. and Mofjeld, P. 2008. "WorldCat Local at the University of Washington Libraries." Library Technology Reports, 44(6): 1-46.