DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Long-term Survival Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: Five-year Results of a Phase II Prospective Clinical Trial

  • Ahn, Sang-Hoon (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kang, So Hyun (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Yoontaek (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Min, Sa-Hong (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Park, Young Suk (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Park, Do Joong (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Hyung-Ho (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • Received : 2018.09.26
  • Accepted : 2019.02.25
  • Published : 2019.03.31

Abstract

Purpose: Despite an increased acceptance of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) in early gastric cancer (EGC), there is insufficient evidence for its oncological safety in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This is a prospective phase II clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility of LG with D2 lymph node dissection (LND) in AGC. Materials and Methods: The primary endpoint was set as 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). The eligibility criteria were as follows: 20-80 years of age, cT2N0-cT4aN3, American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or less, and no other malignancy. Patients were enrolled in this single-arm study between November 2008 and May 2012. Exclusion criteria included cT4b or M1, or having final pathologic results as EGC. All patients underwent D2 lymphadenectomy. Three-year DFS rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 157 patients were enrolled. The overall local complication rate was 10.2%. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 11 patients (7.0%). The mean follow-up period was $55.0{\pm}20.4months$ (1-81 months). The cumulative 3-year DFS rates were 76.3% for all stages, and 100%, 89.3%, 100%, 88.0%, 71.4%, and 35.3% for stage IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC, respectively. Recurrence was observed in 37 patients (23.6%), including hematogenous (n=6), peritoneal (n=13), locoregional (n=1), distant node (n=8), and mixed recurrence (n=9). Conclusions: In addition to being technically feasible for treatment of AGC in terms of morbidity, LG with D2 LND for locally advanced gastric cancer showed acceptable 3-year DFS outcomes.

Keywords

References

  1. Kodera Y, Sano T; Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer 2017;20:1-19.
  2. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994;4:146-148.
  3. Sasako M. Is there role for laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017;43:965-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2017.02.016
  4. Park DJ, Han SU, Hyung WJ, Kim MC, Kim W, Ryu SY, et al. Long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large-scale multicenter retrospective study. Surg Endosc 2012;26:1548-1553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2065-7
  5. Lee J, Kim W. Long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: analysis of consecutive 106 experiences. J Surg Oncol 2009;100:693-698. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21400
  6. Choi YY, Bae JM, An JY, Hyung WJ, Noh SH. Laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: are the long-term results comparable with conventional open gastrectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol 2013;108:550-556. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23438
  7. Lee JH, Son SY, Lee CM, Ahn SH, Park DJ, Kim HH. Morbidity and mortality after laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: results of a phase II clinical trial. Surg Endosc 2013;27:2877-2885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2848-0
  8. Noh SY, Lee JH, Ahn SH, Son SY, Lee CM, Park DJ, et al. Intracorporeal end-to-side esophagojejunostomy using a laparoscopic purse-string clamp during laparoscopic total gastrectomy. J Minim Invasive Surg 2012;15:32-37. https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2012.15.2.32
  9. Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, Kinoshita T, Fujii M, Nashimoto A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1810-1820. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa072252
  10. Bang YJ, Kim YW, Yang HK, Chung HC, Park YK, Lee KH, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:315-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61873-4
  11. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Uyama I, Sugihara K, Tanigawa N; Japanese Laparoscopic Surgery Study Group. A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan. Ann Surg 2007;245:68-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000225364.03133.f8
  12. Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T, Uchiyama K, Katada N, Koeda K, et al. A multi-institutional, prospective, phase II feasibility study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer (JLSSG0901). World J Surg 2015;39:2734-2741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3160-z
  13. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Sansonetti A, Di Paola M, Recher A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 2005;241:232-237. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000151892.35922.f2
  14. Quan Y, Huang A, Ye M, Xu M, Zhuang B, Zhang P, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer 2016;19:939-950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-015-0516-x
  15. Cai J, Wei D, Gao CF, Zhang CS, Zhang H, Zhao T. A prospective randomized study comparing open versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer. Dig Surg 2011;28:331-337. https://doi.org/10.1159/000330782
  16. Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Kim W, Lee HJ, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:627-633.
  17. Maruyama K, Kaminishi M, Hayashi K, Isobe Y, Honda I, Katai H, et al. Gastric cancer treated in 1991 in Japan: data analysis of nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer 2006;9:51-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-006-0370-y
  18. Karpeh MS, Leon L, Klimstra D, Brennan MF. Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than Number? An analysis of 1,038 patients. Ann Surg 2000;232:362-371. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200009000-00008
  19. Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, Sasako M, van de Velde CJ, Welvaart K, Songun I, et al. Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;340:908-914. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199903253401202
  20. Kano Y, Ohashi M, Hiki N, Takahari D, Chin K, Yamaguchi K, et al. Favorable long-term outcomes of one-year adjuvant S-1 monotherapy for pathological stage II or III gastric cancer treated at a high-volume center. Gastric Cancer 2018;21:1024-1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-0827-9
  21. Song J, Lee HJ, Cho GS, Han SU, Kim MC, Ryu SW, et al. Recurrence following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 1,417 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:1777-1786. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-0932-4
  22. Yoo CH, Noh SH, Shin DW, Choi SH, Min JS. Recurrence following curative resection for gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg 2000;87:236-242. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01360.x
  23. Hur H, Lee HY, Lee HJ, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Park YK, et al. Efficacy of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: the protocol of the KLASS-02 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Cancer 2015;15:355. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1365-z

Cited by

  1. Downregulation miR-539 is associated with poor prognosis of gastric cancer patients and aggressive progression of gastric cancer cells vol.26, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3233/cbm-190384
  2. Is the 5-port approach necessary in laparoscopic gastrectomy? Comparison of surgical effects of reduced-port laparoscopic gastrectomy and conventional laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy : A meta-analy vol.99, pp.42, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000022525
  3. Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis vol.8, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v8.i6.471
  4. Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis vol.8, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v8.i6.472
  5. Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Highly Advanced Gastric Cancer: Final Report of a Prospective Phase II Trial (KUGC04) vol.28, pp.13, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10373-8