DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison on the Dosimetry of OSLD and PLD Used in Nuclear Medicine

형광유리 선량계와 광자극 발광선량계를 이용한 핵의학과 선량 측정비교

  • 박정규 (대구보건대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 손상준 (대구파티마병원 핵의학과) ;
  • 박명환 (대구보건대학교 방사선과)
  • Received : 2018.12.26
  • Accepted : 2019.02.26
  • Published : 2019.02.28

Abstract

This study was conducted from July 1 to September 30, 2018 using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter(OSLD) and photoluminescent glass dosimeter(PLD) to measure the 3-month exposure dose and the cumulative dose in the active working area of the nuclear medicine worker Respectively. As a result, the cumulative dose for three months in the worker and work area was measured as 1.97 mSv and 2.02 mSv in the PLD. The mean surface dose and the mean depth dose of the OSLD were measured to be 2.04 mSv. The difference in the total surface dose measured by the PLD and the OSLD was 0.66mSv and the total mean surface dose was 0.07mSv. The difference between the total depth dose and the total depth dose was 0.1mSv and 0.02mSv, respectively. It was found that the dose value of the OSLD was higher than that of the PLD. In addition, it was found that the maximum difference of 0.01mSv was observed between the PLD and the OSLD of the worker. For the dose measurement of the two dosimetry systems, there was no significant difference between the PLD and the OSLD in the surface dose of 0.239 (p>0.05). Also, the significance of PLD and OSLD in the deep dose was 0.109, which was not statistically significant (p>0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements: NCRP Report; 1988.No.93.
  2. ICRP. Recommendation of the International Commission on Rediological Protection. Oxford: ICRP Publication 26 Pergamon Press, New York; 1997.
  3. Han SK, Jeon SK, Jeong JS, Song SY. Comparison of air dose rates and personal exposure doses in the nuclear medicine department. The 43rd Conference on Radiation Radiology. 2008:446.
  4. Park MH. Radiometry. Nationwide Culture History. 2017:323-68.
  5. Jin KH. Personal exposure dosimetry for dosimetry Quality control. Korea Food & Drug Administration; 2007.
  6. Son KH, Shin SH, Lee CY. High dose linearity, cumulative dose, energy dependence of glass dosimeter. Korea Radiation Protection Society; 2009.
  7. Kang BS, GO SJ, Kook JS, Kwon DC, Kim GJ, Kim KH, et al. Radiation detection & Measurement. 4th ed. Seoul: Chung-gu publishing; 2012.
  8. Jursinic PA. Characterization of optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs, for clinical dosimetric measurements. Med. Phys. 2007;34(12); 4594-604. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2804555
  9. Im IC, Yoo YS, Lee JS. Measurement of Skin Dose for Rectal Cancer Patients in Radiotherapy using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Detectors (OSLDs). Korean Journal of Radiation Protection. 2011;36(2):86-92.
  10. Lee WH, Kim SC, An SM. Comparison on the Dosimetry of TLDand OSLD Used in Nuclear Medicine. Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2012; 12(12);329-34. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.12.329
  11. Moon YM. A Study on Effective Dose Measurement for Cone Beam Computed Tomography using Glass Dosimeter [Master' thesis]. Busan: University of Donga-A Korea; 2013.
  12. Jursinic PA. Characterization of optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs for clinical dosimetric measurements. Med. Phys. 2007;34(12):4594-604. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2804555
  13. Jursinic PA. Changes in optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD) dosimetric characteristics with accumulated dose. Med. Phys. 2010;37(1):132-40. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3267489
  14. Hwang JH. Study on the Characteristic and Correction Factor Calculation of Optically stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter Using $Co^{60}$ gamma-ray [master's Thesis]. Busan: Dong-A University Korea; 2016.
  15. Lee JA, Back KM, Kim YS, Son SR, Choi KW, Yoo BK, et al. Evaluation of Photoneutron Dose for Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy by Using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter (OSLD). Korean Society of Radiology. 2014;37(2):125-34.
  16. Park JG, Park MH. Characteristics of fluorescent glass dosimeter (PLD) in diagnostic area. Daegu Health College Papers, 2016;36.
  17. Kwon DC. Buildup Characteristics of Radiophotoluminescent Glass Dosimeters with Exposure Time of X-ray. Biomedical Engineering Letters. 2017;38(5):256-63.
  18. Son JH, Min JH, Kim HS, Yoo KR, Lim HS, Kim JM, et al. Experimental Study with Respect to Dose Characteristic of Glass Dosimeter for Low-Energy by Using Internal Detector of Piranha 657. Korean Society of Radiology. 2012;35(2):119-24.