Journal of Convergence for Information Technology (융합정보논문지)

Convergence Society for SMB (중소기업융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Effect of Biomimicry Robot Education Program based on Technology Education

기술 교육 기반의 생체 모방 로봇 교육 프로그램 개발 및 적용 효과

  • Received : 2019.03.05
  • Accepted : 2019.04.20
  • Published : 2019.04.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, it developed and applied a biomimicry robot education program based on technology education, and to examine its effects. To do this, We were developed a biomimetic robot education program and was applied to gifted education in the technology fields to examine changes of the effects along with satisfaction. The results are as follow: First, the biomimicry robot education program conducted over 15 hours in total, comprised of technological problem solving steps. Second, satisfaction as a quantitative research of this program was higher than average, and as a qualitative research also showed positive satisfaction. Third, the changes in the propensity for technological problem solving and attitudes toward robots were statistically significant after participation in the program.

본 연구에서는 기술 교육 기반의 생체 모방 로봇 교육 프로그램을 개발하고 이를 적용하여 그 효과를 분석하였다. 이를 위해 기술 교육 기반의 생체 모방 로봇 교육 프로그램이 개발되었으며 이를 기술 분야 영재교육에 적용한 후 수업 만족도와 함께 그 효과를 살펴보았다. 연구에 따른 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 생체 모방 로봇교육 프로그램은 총 15차시로 개발되었으며 기술적 문제 해결 과정에 따라 구성되었다. 둘째, 생체 모방 로봇 교육 프로그램에 대한 만족도는 평균보다 높게 나타났으며 질적 평가에서도 긍정적인 만족도를 나타냈다. 셋째, 생체 모방 로봇 교육 프로그램으로 인하여 기술적 문제해결 성향과 로봇에 대한 태도가 긍정적으로 변화되었으며 이는 통계적으로 유의미한 결과를 나타냈다.

Keywords

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n4_109_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Model for developing of the Biomimetic robotics education Program

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n4_109_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Design the researth

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n4_109_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Problem to solving at the program

Table 1. Lesson Plan for the program

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n4_109_t0001.png 이미지

Table. 2 Satisfaction of the program

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n4_109_t0002.png 이미지

Table. 3 Propensity for Technological Problem Solving

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n4_109_t0003.png 이미지

Table. 4 Attitude toward Robots

JKOHBZ_2019_v9n4_109_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. J. W. Park, J. Y. You & J. Y. Lee. (2014). 2014 KISTI Future Technology 10 : Biomimetic robots. Seoul : KISTI.
  2. K. B. Choi & D. H. Kim. (2006). Biomimetic robot. Journal of Machinery, 46(4), 51-56.
  3. C. H. Lee & H. S. Shin. (2016.). Technological Competitive Analysis of biomimetic robot by using Papers. Proceedings of KSMT Annual Meeting 2016. 29-33.
  4. Z. Gao, Q. Shi, T. Fukuda, C. Li & Q. Huang. (2019). An overview of biomimetic robots with animal behaviors. Neurocomputing, 332, 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.12.071
  5. M. K. Habib. (2011). Biomimetics: innovations and robotics. International Journal of Mechatronics and Manufacturing Systems, 4(2), 113-134. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMMS.2011.039263
  6. K. S. Ahn, J. H. Kim & B. H. Lee. (2017). Action Realization of Modular Robot Using Memory and Playback of Motion. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 7(6), 181-186 https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2017.7.6.181
  7. Ministry of Education. (2015). National Curriculum. Notice No. 2015-74 of the Ministry of Education. Sejong : Ministry of Education.
  8. E. N. Savage. (1991). A Rationale for Bio-Related Technology in Technology Education. The Journal of Epsilon Pi Tau, 17(2), 59-62.
  9. S. K. Nam. (2012). A Study on the Technological Thinking Disposition of Technology Subject Related Gifted Student. Journal of Korean Technology Education,12(3), 110-131.
  10. S. Kim. (2018). The Developments and the Effect of TEAMS Integrative Education Programs based on 'Smart-city' Theme-Centered for the Robot Gifted Students in Secondary School. Journal of Korean Technology Education, 18(2), 40-61.
  11. J. Fraenkel, N. Wallen & H. H. Hyun. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill
  12. P. Heppner. (1988). The problem solving inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  13. T. F. Wu, R. L. Custer & M. J. Dyrenfurth. (1996). Technological and Personal Problem Solving Styles : Is there a Difference?. Journal of Technology Education, 7(2), 55-71.
  14. C. S. Lee. (2013). Korean Students' Attitude Scale Towards Robot. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 19(2), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.17055/JPAER.2013.19.2.151
  15. T. W. Kim & S. Yi. (2015). Designing a PBL Problem for the Unit of 'Problem-Solving Activities" in the subject of Technology-Home Economics. Journal of Korean Technology Education, 15(1), 1-21.
  16. S. Kim & S. Yi. (2015). Comparison of Perception Towards the STEAM Education for Mathematics/Science-Gifted Students andInvention-Gifted Students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(12), 1029-1049.
  17. S. Kim. (2015). The developments of TEAMS integrative educational programs based on 'robot' theme-centered for the gifted education in secondary school. Doctoral dissertation. Korea National University of Education, Chung-buk. Korea.
  18. S. Yi & S. A. Bae. (2007). Instructional Design for Fostering Students' Creative Problem Solving ability in Technology Education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 13(4), 77-98. https://doi.org/10.17055/jpaer.2007.13.4.77
  19. S. A. Kim & D. Y. Chung. (2006). A Study on the wayss of Robotics programs at thechnology education in middle school. Journal of Korean Technology Education, 6(4), 127-141.
  20. A. Nagchaudhuri & G. Singh. (2003). Middle School Students get Introduced to Fundamentals of Engineering at the UMES-NOAA Summer Camp. Session#1170, 1-10.
  21. S. A. Kim & S. B. Yi. (2017). Development of Robot Hands-on Activity for Achievement Standards of Advanced Technology in Technology System Domain Under the 2015 Revised High School Technology & Home Economics Subject Curriculum. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(7), 529-548. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2017.17.7.529
  22. S. Y. Kim. (2016). Teaching and learning(PBL) and explore the convergence of the Effects of the practical skills. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 7(2), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2016.7.2.109
  23. R. Kimbell & K. Stables. (2009). Research as a design task. In International Handbook of Research and Development in Technology Education (pp. 599-613). Brill Sense.
  24. S. C. Lee, T. Y. Kim, J. S. Kim, S. J. Kang & J. H. Yoon. (2019). The Effect of a Design Thinking-based Maker Education Program on the Creative Problem Solving Ability of Elementary School Students. JOURNAL OF The Korean Association of information Education, 23(1), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.1.73