<그림 1> 메타데이터 스키마 생성 절차
<표 1> 한의학 연구 분야별 데이터 유형
<표 2> 한국한의학연구원 연구 데이터 구분 및 특징
<표 3> 분류체계별 특성
<표 4> 사전설계요소 및 KISTI 메타데이터 요소 Crosswalk
<표 5> 한국한의학연구원 연구 데이터 관리 및 서비스를 위한 메타데이터 스키마
<표 6> 기존 시스템과의 비교
참고문헌
- 과학기술정보통신부. "국가과학기술표준분류." 2018 [cited 2019. 1. 6.]
- Kim, Suntae et al. 2017. "The metadata for the managing and sharing research data." Telecommunications Technology Association. TTAK.K0-10.0976
- Shin, Eun-jung. 2018. "Introduction of the National R&D Project Data Management Plan" STEPI Science and Technology Policy Forum.
- Cho, SungBok. 2012. "A Study on Strategy for Oriental Medicine resources An Integrated Database System."
- 한국보건산업진흥원. "보건산업기술분류체계." 2013 [cited 2019. 1. 6.]
- 한국보건산업진흥원. "HT융합기술의 분류체계 연구." 2015 [cited 2019. 1. 6.]
- 한국보건산업진흥원. "HT표준기술분류체계." 2014 [cited 2019. 1. 6.]
- Adams Becker, S. et al. 2017. NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Library Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
-
DataCite Statistics. [online] [cited 2018. 12. 11.]
-
Europe 2020 strategy. [online] [cited 2019. 3. 6.]
- European Commission. 2016. Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World. ISBN 978-92-79-57346-0 doi:10.2777/061652
-
Horizon 2020. [online] [cited 2019. 2. 6.]
-
Innovation Union. [online] [cited 2019. 2. 6.]
- Johnson, R., Chiarelli, A. and Parsons, T. 2016. Data asset framework (DAF) survey results. figshare. Fileset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3796305.v4
- JST. 2017a. JST Policy on Open Access to Research Publications and Research Data. Management. https://www.jst.go.jp/EN/about/openscience/policy_openscience_en.pdf
- JST. 2017b. Implementation Guidelines: JST Policy on Open Access to Research Publications and Research Data Management. https://www.jst.go.jp/EN/about/openscience/guideline_openscience_en.pdf
- National Academy of Sciences (US), National Academy of Engineering (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee. 2009. Ensuring the Utility and Integrity of Research Data in a Digital Age. Ensuring the Integrity, Accessibility, and Stewardship of Research Data in the Digital Age. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK215264/ doi: 10.17226/12615
- Rohrig, B. et al. 2009. "Types of study in medical research: part 3 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications." Deutsches Arzteblatt International, 106(15): 262.
- Rolando, L. 2015. "Data Management Plans as a Research Tool." Bul. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech, 41: 43-45. doi:10.1002/bult.2015.1720410510
- Rylance, R. et al. 2016. Concordat on Open Research Data. https://www.ukri.org/files/legacy/documents/concordatonopenresearchdata-pdf/
-
SPEC Kit 334. [online] [cited 2019. 2. 6.]
- Starr, J. and Gastl, A. 2011. "isCitedBy: A Metadata Scheme for DataCite." D-Lib Magazine, 17(1).
- Sut, N. 2014. "Study designs in medicine." Balkan medical journal, 31(4): 273. https://doi.org/10.5152/balkanmedj.2014.1408
- Tenopir, C. et al. 2017. "Research Data Services in European Academic Research Libraries." LIBER Quarterly, 27(1): 23-44. DOI:http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10180
- Uman, L. S. 2011. "Systematic reviews and meta-analyses." Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 57.
- Zeng, X. et al. 2015. "The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review." Journal of evidence-based medicine, 8(1): 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12141