DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Influence of the Locus of control of the Global Public Enterprises on the Job Involvement and Turnover Intention

  • Kim, Boem Soo (School of Business Administration, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Choi, Pil Ho (marketing, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Kim, Il Sik (Ingenium College, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Hwang, Il Yeong (Institute of Information Technology, Kwangwoon University)
  • Received : 2019.04.26
  • Accepted : 2019.06.05
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to reduce the costs required to proactively prevent the turnover intention by the results of personality type of locus of control. which is the behavioral outcome of the members of the organization. Based on this problem consciousness, the present study focused on the personal characteristics of the members of the organization in the enterprise. Among the individual characteristics, the intentions, which are distinct from others, are called personality, Focusing on the locus of control among these types of characteristics of the organization members, the study about how these control positions affect their job involvement and their turnover intention. The results validated in this study are summarized as follows. Among the personality types of the organization's members, internals are found to have higher job involvement than externals. In addition, it was found that internals among the personality types of the members of the organization lower the meaning of turnover intention than external member. In order to overcome uncertain management environment and create and sustain a competitive advantage in the organization, management has a weight-oriented trend and Increasing job involvement in organizational members and lowering their turnover intention will lead to continued productivity, among other things, important management items that managers and managers should pursue. Given these aspects, it is deemed necessary to analyze the personality aspects of the members of the organization and to transform and manage a new management mindset that leads to the enhancement of the personality as an internal rather than an external one and the task immersion of the members of the organization based on it.

Keywords

E1GMBY_2019_v7n2_83_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Study Model

Table 1. Composition and source of survey items

E1GMBY_2019_v7n2_83_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Reliability and Feasibility Analysis regarding Locus of Control

E1GMBY_2019_v7n2_83_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Reliability and Feasibility Analysis regarding Job Involvement

E1GMBY_2019_v7n2_83_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Reliability and Feasibility Analysis regarding Turnover Intention

E1GMBY_2019_v7n2_83_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Regression Analysis on the Control Location and Job Involvement

E1GMBY_2019_v7n2_83_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Regression Analysis on the Control Position and turnover intention

E1GMBY_2019_v7n2_83_t0006.png 이미지

References

  1. Dae-woon Chang, Jean-hyun Park, Tong-jon Na, Young-Sik Rhee, "A Preliminary study of a major-adjustment program for college students with major-aptitude discrepancy", Student Life Institute, Chonbuk National University, 14. pp.1109-1154, 1988
  2. Joo-Yup Kim, Kye Chung Song, Byum Goo Jung, Sang- Eon Park, Organizational Behavior, Seoul, Changminsa. 2015
  3. J. B. Rotter, "Generalized Expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement", Psychological Monographs, 80, pp.11-20 , 1966 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
  4. V. C. Joe, "Review of the Internal-External Control Construct as Personality Variable", Psychological Reports, Vol. 28, pp.619-629, 1971 https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1971.28.2.619
  5. Hammer, W. C., & Organ, D. W, Organizational Behavior : An Applied Psychological Approach(Dallas, Texas : Business Publication Inc., 1978
  6. Julian, J. W., & Karabenick. B.(1968), "Internal Versus External Control and Value of Reinforcement", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.8. pp.89-91, 1968.. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025318
  7. Srull, T. K., & Karabenick, S. A "Effects of Personality and Situational Locus of Control Congruence", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.30, No. 4. pp.618-635, 1975,
  8. Doherty, W. J., & Baldwin, C, "Shifts and Stability in Locus of Control during the 1970's: Divergence of Sexes", Journal of Personality and Psychology, Vol.48, No.4, pp.1048-1053, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.1048
  9. Pandy, J., & Ram. N., "Change in Locus of Control of Upper and Lower Caste Students", Journal of Social Psychology, Vol.104, pp.297-298, 1978. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1978.9924073
  10. Anderson, C. A., "Locus of Control, Coping Behavior, and Performance in a Stress Setting: A Longitudinal Study", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.62, No.4, pp.446-451, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.4.446
  11. Levenson, H., "Differentiation among internality, Powerful Others, and Change", In Lefcourt ed, Research with the Locus of Control Construct. Vol.1, pp.15-66, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-443201-7.50006-3
  12. Saleh, S . D., & Hosek, J, "Job Commitment: Concepts and Measurement", Academy of management Journal, Vol.34, pp.213-215, 1976.
  13. Lodahi, J. M., & Kejner, M., "The Definition and Measurement of Job Commitment", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.49, pp.24-33, 1965. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021692
  14. Lawler, E. E., & Hall. D.T., "Relationship of job characteristics to Job Commitment, Satisfaction and Intrinsic Motivation", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 54, pp. 305-312, 1970. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029692
  15. Kanungo, R. N. , "Measurement of Job and Work Involvement", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 67, pp.341-349, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.341
  16. Vroom, V. H., "Ego-Involvement, Job Satisfaction and Job Performance", Personal Psychology, Vol.22, pp.425-435, 1962.
  17. Fishbein M., & Ajzen, I., Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior, Reading, M.A Addison-Wesley, 1975.
  18. Steel, R. P., & Ovalle, N. K., "A review and meta-analysis of research on the relationship between behavioral intentions and employee turnover", Journal of Applied psychology, Vol. 64, No.9, pp.673-686, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.4.673
  19. Jin Kyung Jung, "A Study on Four Types of Turnover Intention" University of Seoul, Thesis for a MD , 2009.
  20. In-JooKang, "The Relationships among Turnover Intention, Career related Learning, Career Motivation, Perceived Organizational Support, Organizational Commitment, Career Commitment and Employability of Office Workers in Large Corporations" Seoul National University, Thesis for a Ph.D., 2015.
  21. Young-joo Moon, "Effects of Individual Motivation on Turnover Intention among Social Workers : with a focus on the mediation effects of multiple commitment" Seoul National University, Thesis for a PhD., 2010.
  22. Joo-Yup Km, Sang-Eon Park, Hye-Jung Ji, "An Empirical study on the Relationships among Work-Life Balance, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover Intention", Korean Association of Human Resource Development, Vol.14, No.1, pp.1-29, 2011.
  23. Michaels, C. E., & Spector, P. E., "Causes of Employee Turnover : A Test of the Mobley, Griffet,, Hand and Meglino model", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.67, pp. 53-59. 1982. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.1.53
  24. Andrisani, P. J., & Nestel, G., "Internal-External Control as Contributor to and Outcome of Work Experience", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.61, No.2, pp.156-179, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.2.156
  25. Michell, T. R., Smyser, C. M., & Wood. E., "Locus of Control: Supervision and Work Satisfaction", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.18, No.3, pp.623-631, 1975. https://doi.org/10.2307/255692
  26. Blau, G. J., "Locus of Control as a Potential Moderator of the Turnover Process", Journal of Occupational Psychology,Vol.60, No.1, pp. 21-29, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1987.tb00238.x
  27. Nunnally, Psychometric theory, New York, McGraw-Hill series in psychology, 1967.