DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

백워드 설계 모형에 기초한 실과 실천적 문제 중심 수업 설계 모형 개발

Development of an Instructional Design Model for Practical Problem-Based Learning in Practical Arts Based on the Backward Design Model

  • 이은영 (장호원초등학교) ;
  • 최지연 (한국교원대학교 실과교육과) ;
  • 채정현 (한국교원대학교 가정교육과)
  • Lee, Eun-young (Janghowon Elementary School) ;
  • Choi, Ji-Yeon (Dept. of Practical Arts Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Chae, Jung-Hyun (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • 투고 : 2019.06.05
  • 심사 : 2019.06.30
  • 발행 : 2019.06.30

초록

본 연구는 실천적 문제 중심 수업을 설계할 때 보다 구체적이고 체계적으로 수업을 설계하는데 활용하고자 하는 목적으로 백워드 설계 모형에 기초하여 개발되었다. 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해 본 연구에서는 분석, 설계, 개발, 평가의 단계를 거쳐 연구를 진행하였다. 분석 단계에서는 실과 실천적 문제 중심 수업설계 모형의 개발을 위한 이론적 기초가 되는 실천적 문제 중심 교육과정에 대한 문헌 고찰, 수업설계 모형에 대한 문헌 고찰, 2015 개정 실과 교육과정의 분석 등이 이루어졌다. 설계 단계에서는 분석단계의 문헌 고찰을 통해 실과 실천적 문제 중심 수업설계 모형의 단계와 하위요소 등의 내용을 선정하고, 템플릿을 구안하였다. 개발 단계에서는 설계 단계에서 디자인한 내용을 바탕으로 실과 실천적 문제 중심 수업설계 모형의 초안을 개발하였다. 평가단계에서는 개발한 실과 실천적 문제 중심 수업설계 모형의 초안에 대하여 전문가 집단의 검증을 통해 모형을 수정·보완하고, 최종적으로 실과 실천적 문제 중심 수업설계 모형을 완성하였다. 연구 결과, 실과 실천적 문제 중심 수업설계 모형은 '목표 설정하기, 평가 계획하기, 학습활동 계획하기'의 3단계로 구성된 모형의 초안에서 전문가 검증을 거쳐 '실천적 문제 설정하기, 목표 설정하기, 평가 계획하기, 학습활동 계획하기'의 4단계로 최종적으로 모형을 수정·보완하였다. 실과 실천적 문제 중심 수업설계 모형은 전문가 검증을 통해 교사들이 실천적 문제 중심으로 수업을 설계하고자 할 때 구체적인 가이드라인이 될 수 있는 체계적인 템플릿이라고 평가하였다.

This study aimed to present a concrete and systematic lesson design model for practical problem-based learning in Practical Arts based on the backward design model. To this purpose, this study was conducted in the following four stages: analysis, design, development, and evaluation. In the analysis stage, the literature related to the practical-problem-based curriculum and the instructional design model were reviewed as the theoretical foundations, and the 2015 revision of Practical Arts curriculum was analyzed. In the design stage, based on the literature review, the stages and sub-elements of practical-problem-based learning in Practical Arts were determined, and a template of instructional design was constructed. In the development stage, the design model was drafted based on the stages and sub-elements determined at the design stage. In the evaluation stage, the drafted design model from the development stage was evaluated, modified, and enhanced through expert verification. Based on the suggestions from the experts, the 'practical problem setting' stage was added to the original three-stage model, resulting in a model composed of the following four stages: practical problem setting, goal setting, evaluation planning, and learning activity planning. The experts appraised that the developed model of practical-problem-based instructional design in Practical Arts to be a systematic template that would serve as a concrete guideline for teachers who are trying to design classes based on practical problems.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baldwin, E. E. (1984). The nature of home economics curriculum in secondary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.
  2. Brown, M. M. (1978). A conceptual scheme and decision-rules for selection and organization of home economics curriculum content. Madison, WI: The Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
  3. Brown, M. M., & Paolucci, B. (1979). Home economics: A definition. Washington, D. C.: American Home Economics Association.
  4. Chae, J. H. (2015). Discussion on the development direction of 2015 Practical Arts(Technology⋅Home Economics) curriculum. Proceedings of the 2015 Spring Korean Home Economics Education Association Conference (41-49). Cheongju: Korea.
  5. Chae, J. H., Park M. J., Kim, S. G., & Han, J. (2017). Introduction to Home Economics Education. Paju: Kyomunsa.
  6. Chung, J. S. (1998). Discussion on program development models and their implications to program evaluation. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 2(2), 80-97.
  7. Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests (J. Shapiro, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  8. Jang, H. K., & Yoo, T. M. (1994). Lesson Plan Development Based on Marjorie M. Brown's Home Economics Curriculum Paradiam in Area of Human Development and Family Relationship. Journal of Korea Home Economics Education Association, 6(2), 109-113.
  9. Kim, I. S., Choi, H. S., & Choi, B. O. (2000). 수업설계의 원리와 모형 적용 [Principle of instructional design and application of model]. Seoul: Kyoyookbook Publishers.
  10. Kister, J., Laurenson, S., & Boggs, H. (1994). Life planning resource guide: A resource for teaching the life planning core course area of Ohio's work and family life program. Columbus, OH: Ohio Department of Education.
  11. Laster, J. F. (2008). Nurturing critical literacy through practical problem solving. Journal of the Japan Association of Home Economics Education, 50(4), 261-271.
  12. Ministry of Education. (2015). 실과(기술.가정)/정보과 교육과정[Practical Arts(Technology-Home Economics/Informatic)]. Notification no. 2015-74 of Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://ncic.go.kr/mobile.dwn.ogf.inventoryList.do.
  13. Ministry of Education. (2016). 2015 개정 교육과정 총론 해설 [2015 revision curriculum general commentary]. Elementary School. Sejong: Ministry of Education Development.
  14. Ohn, J. D. (2011). Exploration of how elementary pre-service teachers understand and apply the concepts related to Understanding by Design in their unit development. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(1), 41-66. https://doi.org/10.15708/KSCS.29.1.201103.003003
  15. Park, I. S. (2012). A study on an application of backward design for Mathematics: The development of elementary mathematics ration-graph unit. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(4), 109-137. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.30.4.201212.005
  16. Park, M. O., & Chae, J. H. (2012). Home Economics teachers' stages of concern and levels of use about the practical reasoning instruction. Journal of Home Economics Education Association, 24(4), 133-144.
  17. Reid, W. A. (1979). Practical reasoning and curriculum theory: In search of a new paradigm. Curriculum Inquiry, 9(3), 187-207. https://doi.org/10.2307/3202120
  18. Yoo, T. M., & Lee, S. H. (2010). Practical problem focused family & consumer science instruction-the theory & practice. Seoul : BookKorea.
  19. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2008). Understanding by design(2nd ed.), (H. S. Kang, W. H. Lee, Y. S. Huh, J. H Lee, J. S. Yoo, Y. K. Choi, Trans.), 거꾸로 생각하는 교육과정 개발: 교과의 진정한 이해를 목적으로 Original work published 2005). Seoul: Hakjisa.