한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제39권3호
  • /
  • Pages.379-388
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

2015개정 통합과학 수업관찰을 통한 실행된 교육과정 분석

Analysis of Enacted Curriculum through Classroom Observation of Integrated Science Teaching in 2015 Revised Curriculum

  • 투고 : 2019.02.19
  • 심사 : 2019.06.07
  • 발행 : 2019.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 2018년부터 학교현장에서 구현된 통합과학 수업에 대한 관찰과 분석을 토대로 통합과학 안착을 위한 구체적인 지원 방안을 위한 시사점을 도출하려는 것이다. 이를 위해 동일한 성취기준[10통과07-01]에 대하여 전공배경이 각기 다른 4명의 과학교사들이 진행한 수업을 관찰하고 분석하였다. 통합과학 수업의 특징을 교육과정 재구성 측면, 과학과 교과역량 개발 측면, 학습자 중심의 참여형 수업 측면, 과정중심 평가 측면 등으로 구분하여 살펴보았다. 예컨대 교육과정 재구성 측면에서 과학교사들은 해당 성취기준을 3~4차 시로 재구성하고, 핵심개념을 중심으로 학습내용을 적정화하며, 과학 영역간 관통개념 이해를 돕기 위해 노력하고 있었다. 과학과 교과역량 개발 측면에서는 해당 성취기준과 밀접하게 관련된 다양한 교과역량 함양, 과학에 대한 인식론 개발 등에 초점을 둔 수업을 실천하고 있었다. 학습자 중심의 참여형 수업을 만들기 위해 학생 활동위주로, 그리고 학습의 촉진자로서 교사 역할을 강조하고 있었다. 과정중심 평가 측면에서는 피드백이 있는 수업과정 중의 평가 및 교과역량에 대한 과정중심 평가를 강조하고 있었다. 연구결과를 토대로, 통합과학 교육과정 현장안착을 위한 지원 방안을 교사 학습공동체의 필요성, 과정중심 평가 관련 지원, 진정한 통합형 과학과 교육과정 개발의 필요성 등의 측면에서 제안하였다.

The purpose of this study is to derive implications for support plans for the settlement of the Integrated Science subject based on observations and analyses of integrated science lessons implemented in schools since 2018. For this purpose, we observed and analyzed the lessons for the same achievement standard [10 Integrated Science 07-01] implemented by four science teachers with different science majors. The features of integrated science classes were analyzed in light of curriculum reconstruction, science competency development, learner-centered participatory instruction, and process-centered evaluation aspects. For example, in terms of curriculum reconstruction, science teachers have been reorganizing achievement standards into three/four lessons, optimizing learning contents based on core concepts, and helping students' understanding of cross-cutting concepts between science areas. Regarding science competency development, teachers focused their instruction on students' cultivation of diverse science competencies closely related to the achievement standard and development of the epistemology of science. In addition, teachers emphasized student activities and teachers' role as facilitator of learning to create learner-centered participatory classes, as well as assessment during lessons with feedbacks, etc. Based on the results, we suggested and discussed ways to support the settlement of the integrated science curriculum including the need for a teacher learning community, support for process-centered assessment, and the need to develop an authentic integrated science curriculum.

키워드

Table 1. Participants of the classroom observation and analysis

GHGOBX_2019_v39n3_379_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Framework of the analysis and consulting of lessons

GHGOBX_2019_v39n3_379_t0002.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher-curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. SUNY Press.
  2. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
  3. Choo, K. & Sin, J. (2015). A Study on Elementary School Teachers' Perception of Curriculum Integration and Types of Restructuring. Teacher Education Research, 54(1), 120-137. https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.54.1.201503.120
  4. Choi, S., Shin, C., Hwang, E., Lee, S., Kin, E., Yoo, J., Jung, M., & Song, J. (2015). General manual for the operation of the Free Learning Semester. Seoul: KEDI.
  5. Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research(2nd ed). Cambridge University Press.
  6. Harris, L. (2011). Secondary teachers' conceptions of student engagement: Engagement in learning or in schooling? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 376-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.006
  7. Jung, A. (2017). Increasing Interest and Self-confidence in Math through Student-centered Class. The Journal of Future Education, 7(1), 89-109.
  8. KICE (2014). Seminar on the operational activation plan of the Free Learning Semester.
  9. Kim, H., & Jeong, E. (2018). How to apply 205 national curriculum at the general high school. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 21(1), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2018.21.1.61
  10. KOFAC (2015). Development research of 2015 revised draft subject curriculum II: science curriculum (Research report BD15110002). Seoul: KOFAC.
  11. KOFAC & MOE (2016). Development of teaching and learning materials for the 2015 revised curriculum - Integrated Science & Science Inquiry and Experiment. MOE.Daejeon Metropolitan City Office of Education.
  12. Kwak, Y., Lee, J. & Lee, Y. (2017). Ways to Improve In-Service Science Teachers' Expertise with the Introduction of ‘Integrated Science' in the 2015 Revised Curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(2), 263-271. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.2.0263
  13. Hwang, G., Park, S., Yoon, K., Lee, S., & Choi, E. (2014). Research on teacher education curriculum and certificate standards without examination. MOE & Incheon Metropolitan Office of Education.
  14. Lee, H., Kwak, Y., Park, Y., Shin, Y., & Lee, H. (2018). A study on ways to improve in-service teacher training system through the analysis of teacher training programs in 2015 revised curriculum. MOE.CNUE.
  15. Lee, J. & So, K. (2017). Middle School Teachers' Understanding of "Student-Participatory Class". Journal of educational studies, 48(2), 141-165. https://doi.org/10.15854/jes.2017.06.48.2.141
  16. MOE (2015). Science Curriculum. MOE Notification No. 2015-74 [supplement 9].
  17. Shin, H., Ahn, S. & Kim, Y. (2017). A Policy Analysis on the Process-based Evaluation -Focusing on Middle School Teachers in Seoul. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 20(2), 135-162. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2017.20.2.135
  18. Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In Handbook of research on student engagement. 21-44. Springer US.
  19. Son, M., Ahn, Y., Cho, D., Kim, P., & Kim, W. (2012). Research on development of a future curriculum for teacher education institutes. Seoul: Korean Federation of Teachers' Association (KFTA).

피인용 문헌

  1. 중등학교 과학교사들의 공통과학 교사자격증 유무에 따른 통합과학교육과 지속가능발전교육에 대한 인식 vol.12, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2019.12.3.224
  2. 과학교육과 지속가능발전교육 접목 프로그램이 고등학생의 세계관에 미치는 영향 vol.13, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2020.13.3.253