Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety (해양환경안전학회지)

The Korean Society of Marine Environment and safety (해양환경안전학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Problems and its Improvement of Sea Area Utilization Consultation and Impact Assessment for Projects Related to Marine Environment Restoration

해양환경복원관련 사업에 따른 해역이용협의·영향평가의 문제점 및 개선방안

  • Yi, Yong Min (Marine Environmental Impact Assessment Center, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • Jun, Eun Ju (Marine Environmental Impact Assessment Center, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • Lee, Dae In (Marine Environmental Impact Assessment Center, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • Kim, Gui Young (Marine Environmental Impact Assessment Center, National Institute of Fisheries Science)
  • 이용민 (국립수산과학원 해역이용영향평가센터) ;
  • 전은주 (국립수산과학원 해역이용영향평가센터) ;
  • 이대인 (국립수산과학원 해역이용영향평가센터) ;
  • 김귀영 (국립수산과학원 해역이용영향평가센터)
  • Received : 2018.10.17
  • Accepted : 2019.02.25
  • Published : 2019.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Marine activities are becoming more diverse and extensive due to recent social developments, exceeding the environmental capacity of the marine ecosystem. The resilience, resistance, and constancy of marine ecosystems are being damaged or degraded. This prevents the ecosystem from functioning properly, leading to a decline in ecosystem services and value. As a means of returning the damaged ecosystem to health, more and more people are interested in restoration. At a time when restoration projects are gradually expanding, various problems that may arise when implementing the Sea Area Utilization Consultation and Impact Assessment for restoration projects need to be checked, in addition to confirming the direction to be pursued. Therefore, in this study terms related to restoration from research papers and reports were summarized, and the status of the Sea Area Utilization Consultation related to restoration projects and the status of the restoration project were reviewed. In addition, problems with Sea Area Utilization Consultations were considered through a case study to ensure the successful execution of restoration projects. Based on this, we intend to present improvement measures for Sea Area Utilization Consultations and Impact Assessments for restoration projects. This will provide effective information for future policies and plans.

해양에서의 이용행위가 최근 사회발전에 따라 점차 대형화, 다양화되고 있으며 이에 따라 해양생태계가 가지는 환경용량을 넘어서 해양생태계의 복원력 및 저항성, 항성상 등이 훼손 또는 저하되고 있다. 이로 인해서 생태계가 가지는 본연의 기능을 발휘하지 못하게 되고 이는 생태계의 서비스와 가치 하락으로 이어진다. 이에 따라 훼손된 생태계를 다시 건강한 생태계로 회복하고자 하는 인식이 증가하고 있으며 그 수단으로써 복원이 관심을 받고 있다. 복원사업이 점차 확대되는 시점에서, 복원사업의 해역이용협의 및 영향평가를 시행함에 있어 발생할 수 있는 다양한 문제점과 앞으로 나아가야 할 방향에 대해서 점검할 필요가 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 복원과 관련된 용어를 연구논문 및 보고서를 통해서 복원의 개념을 정리하였고 복원사업과 관련된 해역이용협의 검토 상황 및 복원사업의 현황을 살펴보았다. 또한, 복원사업을 성공적으로 이끌어 갈 수 있도록 해역이용협의서 상의 문제점을 사례조사를 통해서 고찰하였다. 이를 토대로 복원사업의 해역이용협의 및 영향평가에 있어 개선방안을 제시하고자 하였다. 이는 향후 정책 및 계획 수립 등에 있어 유용한 정보를 제공할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Abelson, A., B. S. Halpern, D. C. Reed, R. J. Orth, G. A. Kendrick, M. W. Beck and P. A. Nelson(2016), Upgrading Marine Ecosystem Restoration Using Ecological-Social Concepts, BioScience, Vol. 66, No. 2, pp. 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv171
  2. Bayraktarov, E., M. I. Saunders, S. Abdullah, M. Mills, J. Beher, H. P. Possingham, P. J. Mumby and C. E. Lovelock(2016), The Cost and Feasibility of Marine Coastal Restoration. Ecological Applications, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 1055-1074. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-1077
  3. Chae, D. R.(2009). A Study on the Necessity of Introducing Marine Spatial Planning in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment and Safety, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 237-242.
  4. Duarte, C. M., A. Borja, J. Carstensen, M. Elliott, D. Krause-Jensen and N. Marba(2015), Paradigms in the Recovery of Esturarine and Coastal Ecosystems, Estuaries and Coasts, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 1202-1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-013-9750-9
  5. Elliott, M., D. Burdon, K. L. Hemingway and S. E. Apitz(2007), Estuarine, Coastal and Marine Ecosystem Restoration: Confusing Management and Science - A Revision of Concepts, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, Vol. 74, No. 3, pp. 349-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2007.05.034
  6. Halpern, B. S., S. Walbridge, K. A. Selkoe, C. V. Kappel, F. Micheli, C. D'Agrosa, J. F. Bruno, K. S. Casey, C. Ebert, H. E. Fox, R. Fujita, D. Heinemann, H. S. Lenihan, E. M. P. Madin, M. T. Perry, E. R. Selig, M. Spalding, R. Steneck and R. Watson(2008), A Global Map of Human Impact on Marine Ecosystems, Science, Vol. 319, pp. 948-952. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1149345
  7. Jacob, C., A. Buffard, S. Pioch and S. Thorin(2018), Marine Ecosystem Restoration and Biodiversity Offset, Ecological Engineering, Vol. 120, pp. 585-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.09.007
  8. Koo, M. H., D. K. Lee and T. Y. Jung(2012), A Study on the Contexts of Ecosystem Services in the Policymaking Process. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Tecnology, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 85-102.
  9. Lee, B. K. and T. H. Noh(2006), System Improvement Plan and Strategy for Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystem, pp. 1-134.
  10. Lee, D., G. Kim, K. Jeon, K. Eom, J. Yu, Y. T. Kim, J. H. Moon and M. J. Kam(2011), An Application Status and Consideration of System Improvement on the Sea Area Utilization Conference and Impact Assessment. Journal of the Korean Society for Marine Environmental Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 239-248. https://doi.org/10.7846/JKOSMEE.2011.14.4.239
  11. Lee, S., D. Lee and J. Seo(2017), Setting Ecological Goals and Success Criteria Items for Ecological Restoration Projects: Focusing on the Coastal Restoration Projects., Journal of the Korean Society for Marine Environment and Energy, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 12-17. https://doi.org/10.7846/JKOSMEE.2017.20.1.12
  12. Marchetti, M. P., M. Garr and A. N. H. Smith(2010), Evaluating Wetland Restoration Success Using Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Assemblages in the Sacramento Valley, California, Restoration Ecology, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 457-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00468.x
  13. Martin, D. M.(2017), Ecological Restoration Should be Redefined for the Twenty-first Century, Restoration Ecology, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 668-673. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12554
  14. MLTMA(2008), Ministry of Land, Transport and Marine Affairs, Mid and Long Term Promotion Plan for Restoration of Tidal Flat, pp. 1-878.
  15. MOF(2015), Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, The Manual Book for Marine Environmental Impact Assessment,
  16. MOE(2017), Ministry of Environment, Ecological Restoration Project: Guideline for Monitoring and Management, pp. 1-86.
  17. MOF(2018), Marine Fishery Business Implementation Guide, pp. 1-1484.
  18. Nam, J., K. H. Son and J. S. Khim(2015), Multiple Implications of the Restoration of Coastal Wetland Ecosystem and the Establishment of a Strategic Restoration Framework, Ocean and Polar Research, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 211-223. https://doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2015.37.3.211
  19. NRC(1992), National Research Council, Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology, and Public Policy, National Academic Press, Washington DC, USA.
  20. Suding, K. N.(2011), Toward an Era of Restoration in Ecology: Successes, Failures, and Opportunities Ahead. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 465-487. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145115
  21. Wortley, L., J. M. Hero and M. Howes(2013), Evaluating Ecological Restoration Success: A Review of the Literature. Restoration Ecology, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 537-543. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12028