Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Functional Requirements of Core Elements for Research Data Management and Service

연구 데이터 관리 및 서비스를 위한 핵심요소의 기능적 요건

  • 김주섭 (전북대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 김선태 (전북대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 최상기 (전북대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2019.07.21
  • Accepted : 2019.08.16
  • Published : 2019.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Increasing the value of data, paradigm shifts in research methods, and specific manifestations of open science indicate that research is no longer text-centric, but data-driven. In this study, we analyzed the services for DCC, ICPSR, ANDS and DataONE to derive key elements and functional requirements for research data management and services that are still insufficient in domestic research. Key factors derived include DMP writing support, data description, data storage, data sharing and access, data citations, and data management training. In addition, by presenting functional requirements to the derived key elements, this study can be applied to construct and operate RDM service in the future.

데이터의 가치 증대, 연구 방법의 패러다임 변화 그리고 오픈 사이언스 등의 구체적 발현은 연구가 더 이상 기존의 학술지와 같은 텍스트 중심이 아닌 데이터 기반으로 전환되고 있음을 나타내고 있다. 본 연구에서는 아직 국내 연구가 미흡한 연구 데이터 관리 및 서비스를 위한 핵심요소와 해당 기능적 요건을 도출하기 위하여 DCC, ICPSR, ANDS 그리고 DataONE에 대한 서비스를 분석하였다. 분석 결과 도출된 핵심 요소는 'DMP 작성지원', '데이터 기술', '데이터 저장', '데이터 공유 및 접근', '데이터 인용' 그리고 '데이터 관리 교육' 등이다. 또한 도출된 핵심 요소에 기능적 요건을 제시함으로써 향후 실질적으로 RDM 서비스를 구축 및 운영하고자 할 때 본 연구의 내용을 적용할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, Sun-Tae. 2015. Research Paradigm Shift and Data-Oriented Science. National Marine Biodiversity Institutue of Korea, 26 November 2015. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 2.]
  2. Kim, Sun-Tae, Lee, Tae-Young and Kim, Yong. 2012. "Deriving the Determining Factor for the Management of Oceanographic Data." Journal of Information Management, 43(3): 97-115. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2012.43.3.097
  3. Kim, J. 2012. "A Study on University Researchers' Data Management Practices." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(3): 433-455. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.3.201209.433
  4. Kim, J. 2014. "A Study on Research Data Management Services of Research University Libraries in the U.S." Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science, 25(3): 165-189. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.3.165
  5. Park, M., Ahn, I. and Kim, J. 2018. "A Study on Use Case of Research Data Sharing in Biotechnology." Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science, 29(1): 393-416. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2018.29.1.393
  6. Shin, Eun-jung et al. 2017. Introduction and Promotion Plan of Open Science Policy. Sejong: Science and Technology Policy Institute, Policy Research 2017-08.
  7. Shim, Wonsik. 2016. "A Case Study of U.S. Academic Libraries' Research Data Support Services." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(4): 311-332. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.4.311
  8. Ahn, Hyung-joon. 2017. Researcher's Perception Survey on Open Science. Proceedings of 2017 Summer Conference of Korea Technology Management Economics, June 23-24, 2017. Jeju: Jeju KAL Hotel.
  9. Yea, S. J., Jang, H. and Kim, S. 2019. "Metadata Element Design for Korean Medicine Research Data Management and Re-use." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 53(2): 223-246. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.2.223
  10. Lee, Sang Hwan. 2019. DMP (Data Management Plan) starts research data sharing and utilization. 19 Korea Special Library Association-National Association for Policy Information Joint Academic Seminar, June 27, 2019. Yeosu: The Ocean Resort Hotel: 31-46.
  11. Choi, M. S., Lee, S. B. and Lee, S. 2017. "Research Data Management of Science and Technology Research Institutes in Korea." The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 17(12): 117-126. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.12.117
  12. About DataONE. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 7.]
  13. About the DCC (Digital Curation Centre). [online] [cited 2019. 7. 6.]
  14. ANDS. 2017. Data management plans. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 13.]
  15. ANDS About us. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 7.]
  16. Ball, A. and Duke, M. 2015. 'How to Cite Datasets and Link to Publications'. DCC How-to Guides. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 7.]
  17. Cox, A. M. et al. 2017. "Developments in research data management in academic libraries: Towards an understanding of research data service maturity." Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9): 2182-2200. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 8.]
  18. Crouzier, T. 2015. Science Ecosystem 2.0: How will Change Occur?, European Commission. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 8.]
  19. Data citation. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 12.]
  20. Data Management & Curation. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 7.]
  21. DataONE Public Participation in Scientific Research Working Group. 2013. Data Management Guide for Public Participation in Scientific Research. [online] [Cited 2019. 7. 8.]
  22. Fecher, B. and S. Friesike. 2013. "Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought." In: Opening Science (edited by Bartling, S. and S. Friesike), New york: Springer. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 6.]
  23. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 6.]
  24. Jones, S., Pryor, G. and Whyte, A. 2013. 'How to Develop Research Data Management Services - a guide for HEIs'. DCC How-to Guides. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 8.]
  25. Koltay, T. 2017. "Research 2.0 and research data services in academic and research libraries: Priority issues." Library Management, 38(6): 345-353. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 8.]
  26. MERCURY PROJECT SOLUTIONS. 2013. Research Data Management in Practice. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 7]
  27. OECD 2015. "Making Open Science a Reality." OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers. No. 25, Paris: OECD Publishing. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 8.]
  28. OECD. 2007. OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding. Paris: OECD Publishing. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 5.]
  29. OECD. 2016. OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016. Paris: OECD Publishing. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 5.]
  30. Open Science. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 2.]
  31. Perrier, L. and Barnes, L. 2018. "Developing research data management services and support for researchers: A mixed methods study. Partnership." The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 13(1): 1-23. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 4.]
  32. Research Data Management: Why Manage Research Data?. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 9.]
  33. SCIENCE EUROPE. 2018. PRACTICAL GUIDE TO THE INTERNATIONAL ALIGNMENT OF RESEARCH DATA MANAGEMENT. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 8.]
  34. Steeleworthy, M. 2014. "Research data management and the canadian academic library: An organizational consideration of data management and data stewardship." Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 9(1): 1-11. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 4.]
  35. What is Open Data?. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 8.]
  36. Yu, H. H. (2017). "The role of academic libraries in research data service (RDS) provision." The Electronic Library, 35(4): 783-797. [online] [cited 2019. 7. 4.]