DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Risk assessment and evaluation of epidermal growth factor (EGF) transgenic soybean: responses of Cyprinus carpio fed on EGF transgenic soybean

  • Oh, Sung-Dug (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Min, Seok-Ki (Korea Testing & Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Jae Kwang (Division of Life Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Bioengineering, Incheon National University) ;
  • Park, Jung-Ho (Bio-evaluation Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Gi (Bio-evaluation Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology) ;
  • Park, Soo Yun (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
  • Received : 2020.09.09
  • Accepted : 2020.10.06
  • Published : 2020.12.01

Abstract

The epidermal growth factor (EGF) transgenic soybean was developed and biosynthesis of human epidermal growth factor (hEGF) in soybean seeds was confirmed. Also, EGF transgenic soybean were found to contain a herbicide resistance selectable marker by introduction of phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (PAT) gene from the Streptomyces hygroscopicus. For biosafety assessment, the EGF transgenic soybean expressing the EGF biosynthesis gene EGF and herbicide resistant gene PAT was tested to determine effects on survival of Cyprinus carpio, commonly used as a model organism in ecotoxicological studies. C. carpio was fed 100% ground soybean suspension, EGF soybean or non-genetically modified (GM) counterpart soybean (Gwangan). Gene expression of EGF soybean was confirmed by PCR and ELISA to have EGF/PAT. Feeding test showed that no significant differences in cumulative immobility or abnormal response between C. carpio samples fed on EGF soybean and non-GM counterpart soybean. The 48 h-EC50 values of the EGF and non-GM soybean were 1,688 mg·L-1 (95% confidence limits: 1,585 - 1,798 mg·L-1) and 1,575 mg·L-1 (95% confidence limits: 1,433 - 1,731 mg·L-1), respectively. The soybean NOEC (no observed effect concentration) value for C. carpio was suggested to be 625 mg·L-1. We concluded that there was no significant difference in toxicity for non-target organisms (C. carpio) between the EGF soybean and non-GM counterparts.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 농촌진흥청 바이오그린21사업(과제번호: PJ01368603)의 지원에 의해 이루어진 것입니다.

References

  1. Bae CH, Min SK, Ryu SM, Im SH, Kim SI, Cho IS, Cho JG, Oh JA, Park YK. 2018. A study on the replaceability of reference chemical in ecotoxicity test. Korean Journal of Pesticide Science 40:130-142. [in Korean]
  2. ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications). 2019. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops in 2018: Biotech crops continue to help meet the challenges of increased population and climate change. ISAAA Brief No. 54. ISAAA, Ithaca, NY, USA.
  3. Kakembo D, Rajendran DK, Lim MH, Seo JS, Lee YH. 2017. Evaluation of disease resistance in transgenic soybean varieties transformed with EGF, IGF-1, and EGF gene and possible horizontal gene transfer to plant pathogens. Journal of Agriculture & Life Sciences 48:8-14. [in Korean]
  4. KBCH (Korea Biosafety Clearing House). 2019. Major statistics on genetically modified organisms in 2018. KBCH, Daejeon, Korea.
  5. Kim JH, Seo JW, Na YE, An KG. 2007. Ecological health assessments on turbidwater in the downstream after a construction of Yongdam Dam. Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment 40:130-142. [in Korean]
  6. Kim KY, Kim KR, Lee SI. 2010. Acute toxicity test for heavy metals using water fleas. Journal of Korean Wood Science Technology 18:37-47. [in Korean]
  7. Kim MJ, Kim HJ, Pak JH, Cho HS, Choi HK, Jung HW, Lee DH, Chung YS. 2017. Overexpression of AtSZF2 from Arabidopsis showed enhanced tolerance to salt stress in soybean. Plant Breeding and Biotechnology 5:1-15. https://doi.org/10.9787/PBB.2017.5.1.1
  8. Kim MJ, Kim JK, Kim HJ, Pak JH, Lee JH, Kim DH, Choi HK, Jung HW, Lee JD, Chung YS, Ha SH. 2012. Genetic modification of the soybean to enhance the β-carotene content through seed-specific expression. PLOS ONE 7:e48287. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048287
  9. Kwon T, Kim HJ, Yun SY, Kim J, Cho HS, Nam J, Chung YS. 2017. Enhancement of syringin contents in soybean seeds with seed-specific expression of a chimeric UGT72E3/E2 gene. Plant Biotechnology Reports 11:439-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-017-0464-5
  10. Lee SM, Park SY, Yeo YS, Cho HS, Kwon SJ, Oh SD, Oh SW, Kim JK, Park SK. 2015. The Allergy Assessments of Insectresistant Agb0101 Rice. The Journal of the Korean Society of International Agriculture 27:69-75. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2015.27.1.69
  11. Moon JH, Moon JM, Lee YH, Lee JJ. 2013. Influence of transgenic rice plant transformed with silbene synthase gene on insect fauna and biosafety evaluation on biological indicators. Journal Agriculture Life Science 44:11-16. [in Korean]
  12. Oh SD, Jang YJ, Park SY, Suh SJ, Lee BK. 2020. Characterization of hybrid soybean seeds between β-carotene enhanced transgenic soybean and wild soybean. Weed & Turfgrass Science 9:129-139. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5660/WTS.2020.9.2.129
  13. Oh SD, Kim JS, Lee DY, Ryu TH, Suh SJ. 2015. Risk assessment and evaluation of drought-tolerant transgenic rice: Responses of Misgurnus anguillicaudatus and Cyprinus carpio fed on drought-tolerant transgenic rice variety. The Journal of the Korean Society of International Agriculture 27:497-504. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2015.27.4.497
  14. Oh SD, Lee DY, Sohn SI, Lee KJ, Ryu TH, Lee JY, Park BS, Kweon SJ, Suh SC, Park JS. 2011a. Risk assessment and evaluation of Bt-transgenic rice: Responses of Misgurnus anguillicaudatus and Cyprinus carpio fed on Bttransgenic rice variety. The Journal of the Korean Society of International Agriculture 23:570-577. [in Korean]
  15. Oh SD, Lee KJ, Park SY, Lee DY, Sohn SI, Kim MY, Ryu TH. 2013. Responses of Misgurnus anguillicaudatus and Cyprinus carpio fed on disease resistant (OsCK1) rice variety. The Journal of the Korean Society of International Agriculture 32:231-239. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2013.32.3.231
  16. Oh SD, Lee KJ, Park SY, Ryu TH, Suh SJ. 2014b. Acute toxicity evaluation to Daphnia magna of disease resistant (OsCK1) rice. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture 33:121-128. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2014.33.2.121
  17. Oh SD, Lee KJ, Park SY, Sohn SI, Ryu TH, Kim JK, Kim JS, Ahn HI, Ha SH, Park JS, Ahn BO, Cho HS, Suh SJ. 2012. Molecular biological analysis of carotenoid-biofortified rice and its effect on Daphnia magna feeding. The Journal of the Korean Society of International Agriculture 24:477-484. [in Korean]
  18. Oh SD, Lim MH, Lee BK, Yun DW, Sohn SI, Chang AC, Park SK, Suh SJ. 2018. Effects of insect-resistant genetically modified rice (Bt-9) cultivation on non-target insect diversity. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 45:28-37. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20180009
  19. Oh SD, Shin HS, Sohn SI, Lee KJ, Kim HJ, Ryu TH, Lee JY, Park BS, Kweon SJ, Suh SC, Park JS. 2011b. Evaluation and assessment of biosafety for Bt-transgenic rice: Responses of Daphnia magna fed on Bt-transgenic rice variety. Journal of Applied Biological Chemistry 54:296-302. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.3839/jabc.2011.048
  20. Oh SD, Sohn SI, Lee KJ, Shin HC, Park JS, Ryu TH. 2014c. Risk assessment and evaluation of carotenoid-biofortified rice: Responses of Misgurnus Anguillicaudatus and Cyprinus Carpio fed on carotenoid-biofortified rice variety. The Journal of the Korean Society of International Agriculture 26:27-34. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2014.26.1.27
  21. Oh SD, Won SY, Lee KJ, Shon SI, Lee SM, Park SK, Ryu TH. 2014a. Molecular biological characteristics and biosafety assessment for drought tolerant transgenic rice. Korean Journal of Breeding Science 46:389-399. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.9787/KJBS.2014.46.4.389
  22. Park JS, Kim HJ, Cho HS, Jung HW, Cha JY, Yun DJ, Oh SW, Chung YS. 2019. Overexpression of AtYUCCA6 in soybean crop results in reduced ROS production and increased drought tolerance. Plant Biotechnology Reports 13:161-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-019-00527-2
  23. Versteeg DJ, Stalmans MSD, Janssen C. 1997. Ceriodaphnia and Daphnia: A comparison of their sensitivity to xenobiotics and utility as a test species. Chemosphere 34:869-892. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(97)00014-3