Communications of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Longitudinal Study on the Influence of Attitude, Mood, and Satisfaction toward Mathematics Class on Mathematics Academic Achievement

수학수업 태도, 분위기, 만족도가 수학 학업성취도에 미치는 영향에 대한 종단연구

  • Received : 2020.10.28
  • Accepted : 2020.12.24
  • Published : 2020.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

There are many factors that affect academic achievement, and the influences of those factors are also complex. Since the factors that influence mathematics academic achievement are constantly changing and developing, longitudinal studies to predict and analyze the growth of learners are needed. This study uses longitudinal data from 2014 (second year of middle school) to 2017 (second year of high school) of the Seoul Education Longitudibal Study, and divides it into groups with similar longitudinal patterns of change in mathematics academic achievement. The longitudinal change patterns and direct influence of mood and satisfaction were examined. As a result of the study, it was found that the mathematics academic achievement of the first group (1456 students, 68.3%) including the majority of students and the second group (677 students) of the top 31.7% had a direct influence on the mathematics class attitude. It was found that the mood and satisfaction of mathematics classes did not have a direct effect. In addition, the influence of mathematics class attitude on mathematics academic achievement was different according to the group. In addition, students in group 2 with high academic achievement in mathematics showed higher mathematics class attitude, mood, and satisfaction. In addition, the attitude, atmosphere, and satisfaction of mathematics classes were found to change continuously from the second year of middle school to the second year of high school, and the extent of the change was small.

학업성취도에 영향을 미치는 요인은 다양하며, 요인들이 미치는 영향 또한 복합적으로 일어난다. 학업성취도에 영향을 미치는 요인들은 끊임없이 변화하기 때문에 성장을 예측·분석하는 종단연구가 필요하다. 본 연구는 서울교육종단 연구의 2014년도(중학교 2학년)부터 2017년(고등학교 2학년)까지의 종단자료를 활용하여 수학 학업성취도의 종단적인 변화양상이 유사한 그룹으로 나누고 그룹별 수학수업 태도, 분위기, 만족도의 변화양상과 영향을 살펴보았다. 연구결과, 1그룹(1456명, 68.3%)과 2그룹(677명, 31.7%) 학생들의 수학 학업성취도는 수학수업 태도가 직접적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 수학수업 분위기와 만족도는 직접적인 영향을 미치지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 수학수업 태도가 수학 학업성취도에 미치는 영향력은 그룹에 따라서도 다르게 나타났으며, 수학 학업성취도가 높은 2그룹의 학생들은 1그룹의 학생들보다 수학수업 태도, 분위기, 만족도가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 수학수업 태도와 분위기, 만족도는 중학교 2학년부터 고등학교 2학년기간 동안 지속적으로 변화하는 것으로 나타났으며, 그 변화의 폭은 적은 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, K. H., Lim, E. Y., & Shin, J. A. (2013). Analysis and prediction of students's affective domain based on the results of National Assessment of Educational Achievement, Journal of Educational Evaluation, 26(5), 981-1014.
  2. Kang, M. J. (2018). Longitudinal Analysis of High School Students' Affective Attitude, Recognition of Teacher's Teaching Ability, Learning Strategy, and Achievement in Mathematics, Doctoral thesis, Iwaki Womans University.
  3. Ko, Y. J. (2018). A study on analysis of actual state of mathmatics renouncers and treatment at the renouncer's level. Master's thesis, Ulsan University Graduate School of Education.
  4. Kim, S. S., & Ko, M. S. (2007). The Factor of Effect in Growth of Academic Achievement in Adolescent : The Use of Latent Growth Model, Studies on Korean Youth, 18(3), 5-29.
  5. Kim, S. I. (2006). Learner-centered interdisciplinary reform: contribution to educational psychology. Proceedings of the Fall Conference of the Korean Educational Association.
  6. Kim, S. H., Kang, D. H., Moon, S. M., Yoon, W. S. & Park, S. H. (2016). Research on the achievement score for the academic achievement test for the 7th year Seoul National University of Education, Seoul Institute for Education Policy, Institute of Education and Research Information.
  7. Kim, Y. B., & Kang, H. S. (2017). Student Achievement Growth among Middle School Students. Journal of Korean Education, 44(1), 33-61.
  8. Kim, Y. S. (2020). A longitudinal study on the effect of learner's internal and external factors on mathematics academic achievement: For middle and high school students. Doctoral thesis, Sungkyunkwan University.
  9. Kim, H. M., Kim, Y. S., Han, S. Y. (2018). A Longitudinal Analysis on the Relationships Among Mathematics Academic Achievement, Affective Factors, and Shadow Education Participation, School Mathematics, 20(2), 287-306. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2018.06.20.2.287
  10. No, G. S. (2014). Well-informed Thesis Statistical analysis. Han Bit Academy.
  11. Park, S. H. & Yoon, W. S. (2018). Seoul Education Longitudibal Study 8th User Manual. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education Education Research Information Service Education Policy Research Institute.
  12. Shin, J. C., Jung J. S., & Shin T. S. (2008). Causal Relations Between College Student Academic Achievement and Its Factors, The Journal Educational Administraion, 26(1), 287-313.
  13. Shin, J. H., & Shin, T. S. (2006). The Analysis of Relations between Academic Achievement, Academic Self-efficacy, Perceived Teacher Expectancy, and Home Environment, The Journal of Child Education, 15(1), 5-23.
  14. Yang, P. (2017). Analysis of the Effects of Educational Media Usage and Learning Process on Middle School Students' Academic Achievement and Learning Effectiveness: Focused on the seniors of middle school in Seoul. Doctoral thesis, Sungshin University.
  15. Yoo, H. J. (2016). A Study of the Influence That Learner's Prior Proficiency in Spanish and Participation in Class Have on Their Satisfaction in Clsss and Academic Achievement: Focusing on Spanish Major in Universities. Master's thesis, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.
  16. Lee, J. H., & Park, S. M. (2011). Current Conditions and Students' Perception on Mathematics Exhibition, School Mathematics, 13(2), 229-243.
  17. Lim, H. J. (2016). Structural relationships among variables affecting the math in-class attitude of middle school students: Focusing on the student-centered teaching effect at regular and innovation schools. Secondary Education Research, 64(4), 1075-1104. https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2016.64.4.1075
  18. Chung, Y. K., Lee, S. Y., Song, J. Y., & Woo, Y. K. (2017). Differential relations of students' perceived instructions to their motivation, classroom attitude, and academic achievement: The moderating role of self-efficacy, Education Method Research, 29(1), 211-235.
  19. Brookover, W. B., Schweitzer, J. H., Schneider, J. M., Beady, C. H., Flood, P. K., & Wisenbaker, J. M. (1978). Elementary school social climate and school achievement. American educational research journal, 15(2), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312015002301
  20. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Edition, 154, 136-162.
  21. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733.
  22. Corcoran, M. (2000). Mobility, persistence, and the intergenerational determinants of children's success, Focus, 21(2), 16-20.
  23. Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factory analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
  24. DeRoon-Cassini, T. A., Mancini, A. D., Rusch, M. D., & Bonanno, G. A. (2010). Psychopathology and Resilience Following Traumatic Injury: A Latent Growth Mixture Model Analysis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 1(55), 1-11.
  25. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the association for Information Systems, 1(1), 8.
  26. Hackman, M. Z., & Walker, K. B. (2009). Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learnimng and satisfaction, Communication Education, 39(3), 196-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378802
  27. Jung, T., & Mickrama, K. A. S. (2007). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x
  28. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. NY: The Guilford Press.
  29. Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2014). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.
  30. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
  31. Muthen, B. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. 346-368. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  32. Muthen, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2009). Growth mixture modeling: Analysis with non-Gaussian random effects. In Fitzmaurice, G., Davidian, M., Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G.(eds.), Longitudinal Data Analysis, pp.143-165. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
  33. Muthen, B. O., & Shedden, K. (1999). Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 55, 463-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00463.x
  34. Wickrama, K. K., Lee, T. K., O'Neal, C. W., & Lorenz, F. O. (2016). Higher-order growth curves and mixture modeling with Mplus: A practical guide. Routledge.
  35. Wright, D. B. (2017). Some Limits Using Random Slope Models to Measure Academic Growth. In Frontiers in Education. Frontiers, 2(58).
  36. Ye, F., & Daniel, L. (2017). The Impact of Inappropriate Modeling of Cross-Classified Data Structures on Random-Slope Models. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 16(2), 25.