Journal of Technologic Dentistry (대한치과기공학회지)

Korean Academy of Dental Technology (대한치과기공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accuracy of full arch digital model obtained from rendering-based intraoral scanner(IOS) : An example of CS-3600 system

동영상 촬영방식의 구강스캐너로 채득된 전악치열 디지털모형의 정확도 분석 : CS-3600 시스템을 중심으로

  • Kim, Jae-Hong (Department of Dental Laboratory Science, College of Health Science, Catholic University of Pusan)
  • 김재홍 (부산가톨릭대학교 보건과학대학 치기공학과)
  • Received : 2020.01.31
  • Accepted : 2020.02.20
  • Published : 2020.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of definitive casts that are fabricated from digital intraoral impression and conventional impression technique. Methods: A master model(ANNA-4, Frasaco GmbH, Tettnang, Germany) with the prepared upper full arch tooth was used. Conventional impression and then stone model(n=10) were produced from this master model, and on the other hands, digital impressions were made with the CS-3600 intraoral scanner(n=10). Six linear measurements were recorded between landmarks, directly on each of the stone models on two occasions by a single examiner. Measurements were made with a digital caliper to the nearest 0.01mm from manual models and with the software(Delcam PowerSHAPE) from the virtual models. The t-student test for paired samples and intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC) were used for statistical analysis. Results: The measurement of two methods showed good reliability. The ICC of the two models were 0.88~0.91(stone model) and 0.94~0.99(digital model). The mean differences to master model for stone model and digital model were 0.10~0.14mm, and 0.14~0.20mm, respectively. Conclusion: The definitive casts obtained with digital intraoral technique model had significantly larger dimensions as compared to those of the stone model. However, the differences to the master model detected appear to provide enough accuracy and reliability for clinical application.

Keywords

References

  1. Akyalcin S, Dyer DJ, English JD, Sar C. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different source: Diagnostic accuracy and registration analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144(6), 831-837, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.08.014
  2. Alcan T, Ceylanoglu C, Baysal B. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthod, 79(1), 30-36, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2319/100307-475.1
  3. Anadioti E, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Holloway JA, Denry I, Thomas GW, et al. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. J Prosthodont, 23(8), 610-617, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12180
  4. Boitelle P, Mawussi B, Tapie L, Fromentin O. A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. J Oral Rehabil, 41(11), 853-874, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12205
  5. Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L, Kirsten A, Reich S. The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Invest, 17(9), 2119-2125, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0923-5
  6. Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc, 140(10), 1301-1304, 2009. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0054
  7. Creed B, Chung HK, Jeryl DE, James JX, Lee A. Comparison of the accuracy of linear measurement obtained from cone beam computerized tomography images and digital models. Semin Orthod, 17(2), 49-56, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2010.08.010
  8. Dalstra M, Melsen B. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod, 36(1), 36-41, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1179/14653120722905
  9. Gimenez B, Ozcan M, Martinez-Rus F, Padies G. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation and depth. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 17(Suppl 1), 56-64, 2015.
  10. Grunheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: An assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 146(5), 673-682, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.023
  11. Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov Al. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod, 35(3), 191-201, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1179/146531207225022626
  12. Kuroda T, Motohashi N, Tominaga R, Iwata R. Three-dimensional dental cast analyzing system using laser scanning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 110(4), 365-369, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70036-7
  13. Lim MY, Lim SH. Comparison of model analysis measurements among plaster model, laser scan digital model, and cone beam CT image. Korean J Orthod, 39(1), 6-17, 2009. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2009.39.1.6
  14. McGuinness NJ, Stephenes CD. Storage of orthodontic study models in hospital units in the U.K. Br J Orthod, 19, 227-32, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.19.3.227
  15. Mah J. Hatcher D. Current status and future needs in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofacial Res, 6(Suppl 1), 10-16, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.230.x
  16. Naidu D, Free TJ. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: A comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144(2), 304-310, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.011
  17. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange, 2009.
  18. Pradies G, Zarauz C, Valverde A, et al. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology. J Dent, 43(2), 201-208, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.12.007
  19. Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod, 74(2), 298-303, 2004.
  20. Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL. Diagnostic accuracy and measurement sensitivity of digital models for orthodontic purposes: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 149(2), 161-170, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.029
  21. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wostmann B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression technique and workflow. Clin Oral Investig, 17(1), 1759-1764, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0864-4
  22. Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129(2), 794-803, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.023
  23. Van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One, 7(8), e43312, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043312
  24. Vojdani M, Torabi K, Farjood E, Khaledi AAR. Comparison the marginal and internal fit of metal copings cast from wax patterns by CAD/CAM and conventional wax up techniques. J Dent, 14(3), 118-129, 2013.
  25. Watanebe-Kanno GA, Abrao J, Miasiro J, Hiroshi Sanchez-Ayala A, Lagravere MO. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile 3 digital models. Braz Oral Res, 23(3), 288-295, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242009000300011