Journal of Technologic Dentistry (대한치과기공학회지)

Korean Academy of Dental Technology (대한치과기공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of inlay ceramic restorations manufactured using the hot-pressing method

열 가압 방식을 사용하여 제작된 인레이 세라믹 수복물의 적합도 평가

  • Lee, Beom-Il (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • You, Seung-Gyu (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • You, Seung-Min (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Park, Dong-In (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Dental Laboratory Science & Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
  • 이범일 (고려대학교 대학원 보건과학과 치의기공전공) ;
  • 유승규 (고려대학교 대학원 보건과학과 치의기공전공) ;
  • 유승민 (고려대학교 대학원 보건과학과 치의기공전공) ;
  • 박동인 (고려대학교 대학원 보건과학과 치의기공전공) ;
  • 김지환 (고려대학교 대학원 보건과학과 치의기공전공)
  • Received : 2019.12.27
  • Accepted : 2020.03.09
  • Published : 2020.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate ceramic inlay produced by heat pressing that inlay pattern made by subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing method. Methods: A mandibular lower first molar that mesial occlusal cavity (MO cavity) die was prepared. After fabricating an epoxy resin model using a silicone impression material, epoxy resin die was scanned with a dental model scanner to design an MO cavity inlay. The designed STL pile was used to fabricate wax patterns and resin patterns, and then lithium disilicate ceramic inlays were fabricated using hot-press method. For the measurement of the marginal and internal gap of the lithium disilicate, silicone replica method was applied, and gap was measured through an optical microscope (x 80). Data were tested for significant differences using the Mann-Whitney Utest. Results: The marginal fit was 103.56±9.92㎛ in the MIL-IN group and 81.57±9.33㎛ in the SLA-IN group, with a significant difference found between the two groups (p<0.05). The internal fit was 120.99±17.52㎛ in the MIL-IN group and 99.18±6.65㎛ in the SLA-IN group, with a significant difference found between the two groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: It is clinically more appropriate to apply the additive manufacturing than subtractive manufacturing method in producing lithium disilicate inlay using CAD/CAM system.

Keywords

References

  1. Alharbi N, Wismeijer D, Osman RB. Additive Manufacturing Techniques in Prosthodontics: Where Do We Currently Stand? A Critical Review. Int J Prosthodont, 30(5), 474-484, 2017. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5079
  2. Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kastner K, Walter MH. Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent, 84(4), 419-424, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.109125
  3. Bottino MA, Campos F, Ramos NC, Rippe MP, Valandro LF, Melo RM. Inlays made from a hybrid material: adaptation and bond strengths. Oper Dent, 40(3), 83-91, 2015.
  4. Galante R, Figueiredo-Pina CG, Serro AP. Additive manufacturing of ceramics for dental applications: A review. Dent Mater, 35(6), 825-846, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.026
  5. Grenade C, Mainjot A, Vanheusden A. Fit of single tooth zirconia copings: comparison between various manufacturing processes. J Prosthet Dent. 105(4), 249-255, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60040-1
  6. Hallmann L, Ulmer P, Gerngross MD, Jetter J, Mintrone M, Lehmann F, Kern M. Properties of hot-pressed lithium silicate glass-ceramics. Dent Mater, 35(5), 713-729, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.027
  7. Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Roberson TM. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays: a four-year study. J Am Dent Assoc, 127(8), 1171-1175, 1996. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0408
  8. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent, 62(4), 405-408, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4
  9. Homsy FR, Ozcan M, Khoury M, Majzoub ZA. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies. J Prosthet Dent, 120(4), 530-536, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.006
  10. Kaleli N, Ural C, Ozkoylu G, Duran I. Effect of layer thickness on the marginal and internal adaptation of laser-sintered metal frameworks. J Prosthet Dent, 121(6), 922-928, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.08.018
  11. Kang W, Park JK, Kim SR, Kim WC, Kim JH. Effects of core and veneer thicknesses on the color of CAD-CAM lithium disilicate ceramics. J Prosthet Dent, 119(3), 461-466, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.005
  12. Kim DY, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Reproducibility of different arrangement of resin copings by dental microstereolithography: Evaluating the marginal discrepancy of resin copings. J Prosthet Dent, 117(2), 260-265, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.007
  13. Kim DY, Jeon JH, Park JY, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Comparison of the marginal and internal gap of metal coping according to processing method of dental CAD/CAM System. J Dent Hyg Sci, 15(1), 12-17, 2015. https://doi.org/10.17135/jdhs.2015.15.1.12
  14. Kim JH, Kim KB. Influence of final crystallization process on precision of fit of monolithic CAD/CAM-generated restorations by lithium disilicate: A comparative study. J Kor Aca of Den Tec, 41(4), 271-278, 2019. https://doi.org/10.14347/KADT.2019.41.4.271
  15. Kim KB. Evaluation of clinical adaptation of dental prostheses printed by 3-dimensional printing technology. J Kor Aca of Den Tec, 41(1), 1-7, 2019. https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2019.41.1.1
  16. Mai HN, Lee KB, Lee DH. Fit of interim crowns fabricated using photopolymer-jetting 3D printing. J Prosthet Dent, 118(2), 208-215, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.030
  17. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J, 131(3), 107-111, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  18. Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems: A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand, 51(4), 201-206, 1993. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040568
  19. Nawafleh NA, Mack F, Evans J, Mackay J, Hatamleh MM. Accuracy and reliability of methods to measure marginal adaptation of crowns and FDPs: a literature review. J Prosthodont, 22(5), 419-428, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12006
  20. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KT, Hui D. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos. Part B Eng, 143, 172-196, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
  21. Revilla LM, Ozcan M. Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers: current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthodont, 28(2), 146-158, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12801
  22. Rippe MP, Monaco C, Volpe L, Bottino MA, Scotti R, Valandro LF. Different methods for inlay production: effect on internal and marginal adaptation, adjustment time, and contact point. Oper Dent, 42(4), 436-444, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-093-L
  23. Schaefer O, Decker M, Wittstock F, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro. J Dent, 42(6), 677-683, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.016
  24. Shamseddine L, Mortada R, Rifai K, Chidiac JJ. Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD-CAM wax pattern process plans: A comparative in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent, 118(1), 49-54, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.003
  25. Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent, 64(1), 18-24, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90147-5
  26. Yang Y, Yu J, Gao J, Guo J, Li L, Zhao Y, Zhang S. Clinical outcomes of different types of tooth-supported bilayer lithium disilicate all-ceramic restorations after functioning up to 5 years: a retrospective study. J Dent, 51, 56-61, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.05.013