The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Marginal and internal discrepancy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by subtractive and additive manufacturing

절삭 및 적층 가공법으로 제작된 3본 고정성 국소의치의 변연 및 내면 적합도에 관한 연구

  • Choi, Jae-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 최재원 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2019.08.28
  • Accepted : 2019.10.03
  • Published : 2020.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study was to evaluate marginal and internal discrepancy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDP) fabricated by subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing. Materials and methods: 3-unit bridge abutments without the maxillary left second premolar were prepared (reference model) and the reference model scan data was obtained using an intraoral scanner. 3-unit fixed dental prostheses were fabricated in the following three ways: Milled 3-unit FDP (MIL), digital light processing (DLP) 3D printed 3-unit FDP (D3P), stereolithography apparatus (SLA) 3D printed 3-unit FDP (S3P). To evaluate the marginal/internal discrepancy and precision of the prosthesis, scan data were superimposed by the triple-scan protocol and the combinations calculator, respectively. Quantitative and qualitative analysis was performed using root mean square (RMS) value and color difference map in 3D analysis program (Geomagic control X). Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (α=.05), MannWhitney U test and Bonferroni correction (α=.05/3=.017). Results: The marginal discrepancy of S3P group was superior to MIL and D3P groups, and MIL and D3P groups were similar. The D3P and S3P groups showed better internal discrepancy than the MIL group, and there was no significant difference between the D3P and S3P groups. The precision was excellent in the order of MIL, S3P, and D3P groups. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, the 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by additive manufacturing showed better marginal and internal discrepancy than the those of fabricated by subtractive manufacturing, but the precision was poor.

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 절삭 가공법 및 적층 가공법에 의해 제작된 3본 고정성 국소의치의 변연 및 내면 적합도를 비교하는 것이다. 재료 및 방법: 상악 좌측 제2소구치가 상실된 3본 고정성 국소의치 지대치를 제작하고(주모형), 구강 스캐너를 이용해 주모형 스캔 데이터를 얻었다. 3본 고정성 보철물은 다음과 같은 3가지 방법으로 제작하였다: Milled 3-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDP) (MIL군), digital light processing (DLP) 3D printed 3-unit FDP (D3P군), stereolithography apparatus (SLA) 3D printed 3-unit FDP (S3P군). 보철물의 변연 및 내면 적합도와 내면 정밀도 평가하기 위해 각각 triple-scan protocol과 콤비네이션 수식을 사용하여 스캔 데이터를 중첩하였다. 3차원 분석 프로그램(Geomagic control X)을 사용하여 root mean square (RMS) 값과 color difference map 통해 정량 및 정성 분석 시행하였다. Kruskal-Wallis test (α = .05)와 Mann-Whitney U test 및 Bonferroni correction (α = .05/3 = .017)을 이용하여 통계 분석하였다. 결과: S3P군의 변연 적합도는 MIL군과 D3P군에 비해 우수하였으며, MIL군과 D3P군은 비슷한 수준을 보였다. D3P군과 S3P군은 MIL군에 비해 상대적으로 우수한 내면 적합도를 보였으며, D3P군과 S3P군 사이에는 유의한 차이가 없었다. 한편, MIL군, S3P군, 그리고 D3P군 순으로 우수한 정밀도를 보였다. 결론: 본 연구의 한계 내에서 적층 가공법으로 제작된 3본 고정성 보철물은 절삭 가공법으로 제작된 3본 고정성 보철물에 비해 우수한 변연 및 내면 적합도를 보인 반면 정밀도는 떨어지는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang SY, Park JH, Kim JH, Kim WC. Accuracy of provisional crowns made using stereolithography apparatus and subtractive technique. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:354-60. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.354
  2. Rakhshan V. Marginal integrity of provisional resin restoration materials: A review of the literature. Saudi J Dent Res 2015;6:33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjdr.2014.03.002
  3. Tom T, Uthappa M, Sunny K, Begum F, Nautiyal M, Tamore S. Provisional restorations: An overview of materials used. J Adv Clin Res Insights 2016;3:212-4. https://doi.org/10.15713/ins.jcri.141
  4. Lee WS, Lee DH, Lee KB. Evaluation of internal fit of interim crown fabricated with CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing system. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:265-70. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.265
  5. Alharbi N, Osman R, Wismeijer D. Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:760-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.002
  6. Abdullah AO, Tsitrou EA, Pollington S. Comparative in vitro evaluation of CAD/CAM vs conventional provisional crowns. J Appl Oral Sci 2016;24:258-63. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150451
  7. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350
  8. van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
  9. Torabi K, Farjood E, Hamedani S. Rapid prototyping technologies and their applications in prosthodontics, a review of literature. J Dent (Shiraz) 2015;16:1-9.
  10. Kim CM, Kim SR, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Trueness of milled prostheses according to number of ball-end mill burs. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:624-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.014
  11. Hoang LN, Thompson GA, Cho SH, Berzins DW, Ahn KW. Die spacer thickness reproduction for central incisor crown fabrication with combined computer-aided design and 3D printing technology: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:398-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.004
  12. Sun J, Zhang FQ. The application of rapid prototyping in prosthodontics. J Prosthodont 2012;21:641-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00888.x
  13. Liu Q, Leu MC, Schmitt SM. Rapid prototyping in dentistry: technology and application. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2006;29:317-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-2523-2
  14. Ozcelik TB, Yilmaz B, Seker E, Shah K. Marginal adaptation of provisional CAD/CAM restorations fabricated using various simulated digital cement space settings. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:1064-9. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6271
  15. Burns DR1, Beck DA, Nelson SK; Committee on research in fixed prosthodontics of the academy of fixed prosthodontics. A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment: report of the committee on research in fixed prosthodontics of the academy of fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:474-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00259-2
  16. Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P, Jeannin C, Pradelle N, Seux D, Grosgogeat B. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM inlay/onlay restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:590-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.006
  17. Alharbi N, Alharbi S, Cuijpers VMJI, Osman RB, Wismeijer D. Three-dimensional evaluation of marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed interim restorations fabricated on different finish line designs. J Prosthodont Res 2018;62:218-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.09.002
  18. Mai HN, Lee KB, Lee DH. Fit of interim crowns fabricated using photopolymer-jetting 3D printing. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:208-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.030
  19. Huh JB, Kim US, Kim HY, Kim JE, Lee JY, Kim YS, Jeon YC, Shin SW. Marginal and internal fitness of three-unit zirconia cores fabricated using several CAD/CAM systems. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2011;49:236-44. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2011.49.3.236
  20. Christensen GJ. The state of fixed prosthodontic impressions: room for improvement. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:343-6. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0175
  21. Homsy FR, Ozcan M, Khoury M, Majzoub ZAK. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:783-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.025
  22. Ahn JJ, Huh JB, Choi JW. In vitro evaluation of the wear resistance of provisional resin materials fabricated by different methods. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2019;57:110-7. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.2.110
  23. Cho WT, Choi JW. Comparison analysis of fracture load and flexural strength of provisional restorative resins fabricated by different methods. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2019;57:225-31. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.3.225
  24. Schaefer O, Watts DC, Sigusch BW, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: a three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility. Dent Mater 2012;28:320-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.008
  25. Son K, Lee S, Kang SH, Park J, Lee KB, Jeon M, Yun BJ. A comparison study of marginal and internal fit assessment methods for fixed dental prostheses. J Clin Med 2019;8:785. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060785
  26. Sachs C, Groesser J, Stadelmann M, Schweiger J, Erdelt K, Beuer F. Full-arch prostheses from translucent zirconia: accuracy of fit. Dent Mater 2014;30:817-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.001
  27. Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:201-6. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040568
  28. Colpani JT, Borba M, Della Bona A. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings. Dent Mater 2013;29:174-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.012
  29. Praca L, Pekam FC, Rego RO, Radermacher K, Wolfart S, Marotti J. Accuracy of single crowns fabricated from ultrasound digital impressions. Dent Mater 2018;34:e280-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.301
  30. Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G. Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns-validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:116-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2003.01203.x
  31. Park JY, Bae SY, Lee JJ, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of three different dental prostheses: comparison of the silicone replica technique and three-dimensional superimposition analysis. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:159-69. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.159
  32. Schaefer O, Decker M, Wittstock F, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro. J Dent 2014;42:677-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.016
  33. Dahl BE, Ronold HJ, Dahl JE. Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lost-wax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:400-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.06.017
  34. Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: Options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res 2016;60:72-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.01.003
  35. De Souz a AF, Diniz AE, Rodrigues AR, Coelho RT. Investigating the cutting phenomena in free-form milling using a ball-end cutting tool for die and mold manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2014;71:1565-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5579-4
  36. Lee S. Prospect for 3D printing technology in medical, dental, and pediatric dental field. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2016;43:93-108.
  37. Dikova T, Dzhendov DA, Ivanov D, Bliznakova K. Dimensional accuracy and surface roughness of polymeric dental bridges produced by different 3D printing processes. Arch Mater Sci Eng 2018;94:65-75.
  38. Nejatidanesh F, Lotfi HR, Savabi O. Marginal accuracy of interim restorations fabricated from four interim autopolymerizing resins. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:364-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.030
  39. Yao J, Li J, Wang Y, Huang H. Comparison of the flexural strength and marginal accuracy of traditional and CAD/CAM interim materials before and after thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:649-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.012
  40. Jeong SJ, Cho HW, Jung JH, Kim JM, Kim YL. Comparative evaluation of marginal and internal fit of metal copings fabricated by various CAD/CAM methods. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2019;57:211-8. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.3.211
  41. Kim DY, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Reproducibility of different arrangement of resin copings by dental microstereolithography: Evaluating the marginal discrepancy of resin copings. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:260-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.007
  42. Berger U. Aspects of accuracy and precision in the additive manufacturing of plastic gears. Virtual Phys Prototype 2015;10:49-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2015.1026127
  43. Osman RB, Alharbi N, Wismeijer D. Build angle: Does it influence the accuracy of 3D-printed dental restorations using digital light-processing technology? Int J Prosthodont 2017;30:182-8. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5117
  44. Alharbi N, Osman RB, Wismeijer D. Factors influencing the dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed full-coverage dental restorations using stereolithography technology. Int J Prosthodont 2016;29:503-10. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4835
  45. Shembesh M, Ali A, Finkelman M, Weber HP, Zandparsa R. An in vitro comparison of the marginal adaptation accuracy of CAD/CAM restorations using different impression systems. J Prosthodont 2017;26:581-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12446