Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship (벤처창업연구)

The Korean Society of Business Venturing (한국벤처창업학회)
권호 표지

Integrated Study on the Factors Influencing Sustainable Innovation Cluster of Pangyo Techno Valley

판교테크노벨리의 지속가능한 혁신 클러스터 영향요인에 관한 통합연구

  • 박정선 (경남과학기술대학교 창업대학원) ;
  • 박상혁 (경남과학기술대학교 창업대학원) ;
  • 홍성신 (경기도경제과학진흥원 클러스터혁신팀)
  • Received : 2020.01.10
  • Accepted : 2020.02.19
  • Published : 2020.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Korea's innovation cluster policy has been implemented since 2005 with the goal of balanced regional development. The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors affecting the sustainability of innovative cluster tenants by using Pangyo Techno Valley as an example. Pangyo Techno Valley was established under the leadership of the local government (Gyeonggi-do) rather than the central government and it is called "Silicon Valley of Korea" and "Asia Silicon Valley" and is becoming more representative. The growing number of companies in Pangyo Techno Valley decreased in 2017 compared to 2016. This is because Pangyo Techno Valley's business ecosystem will change from 2019. In this paper, quantitative and qualitative studies were conducted to investigate the influencing factors. Quantitative research was conducted based on the survey and qualitative research was applied through interviews. The quantitative research examined the factors affecting the sustainability of Pangyo Techno Valley, and the qualitative research examined the specific reasons and additional factors for the quantitative research results. The quantitative results showed that factors affecting sustainability in terms of changes in corporate internal conditions, human and physical infrastructure, cooperation and synergy, and occupancy patterns. The specific reason for the impact appeared in the qualitative research process. The support category of local governments did not show any significant factors in quantitative research. In addition, qualitative research suggested 'Good image of Pangyo Techno Valley' as the category that has the greatest impact on sustainability. It is shown that companies are passive and expect the role of local governments in activating cooperation network in Pangyo Techno Valley. In this paper, based on the results of the study, Pangyo Techno Valley is presented with a realistic plan based on real estate issues and an ideal plan with a long-term perspective.

우리나라의 혁신클러스터 정책은 지역균형발전을 목표로 2005년부터 본격적으로 추진되었다. 본 연구는 판교테크노밸리를 사례로 혁신클러스터 입주기업의 지속가능성에 영향을 미치는 요인을 조사하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 판교테크노밸리는 중앙정부 보다는 지자체(경기도)의 주도하에 건립되었고 '한국의 실리콘밸리', '아시아 실리콘밸리' 등으로 불리며 대표성이 커지고 있다. 성장하고 있는 판교테크노밸리는 2016년 대비 2017년에 입주기업 수가 감소하는 현상이 발생하였고, 2019년을 기점으로 판교테크노밸리의 비즈니스 생태계가 변할 수 있는 이슈(기업의 입지 이전 가능 이슈)가 발생하기 때문이다. 본 논문에서는 영향 요인을 조사하기 위해 양적 및 질적 연구를 통합하여 진행하였다. 설문조사를 기반으로 양적연구를 진행하고 인터뷰를 통한 질적 연구를 적용하였다. 양적 연구에서는 판교테크노밸리의 지속가능성에 영향을 주는 요인을 조사하였고, 질적 연구에서는 양적 연구결과에 대한 구체적인 이유와 추가적인 요인을 조사하였다. 양적 연구결과 기업내부여건변화, 인적·물적 인프라, 협력 및 시너지, 입주 형태 범주에서 지속가능성에 대한 영향력을 발휘하는 요인들이 나타났다. 영향력에 대한 구체적 이유는 질적 연구과정에선 나타났다. 지자체의 지원 범주는 양적 연구에서 의미있는 요인이 나타나지 않았다. 추가적으로 질적 연구를 통해 지속가능성에 영향을 가장 크게 발휘하는 범주로 '판교테크노밸리의 좋은 이미지'가 제시되었다. 판교테크노밸리 내 협력네트워크 활성화에 대해서는 기업들이 수동적인 자세를 취하고 있으며 지자체의 역할을 기대하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 판교테크노밸리가 지속가능하기 위한 방안으로 현실적인 방안과 이상적인 방안을 함께 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bok, D. G., Ko, Y. S., Ko, J. M., Kwon, O. H., Kim, D. G., & Sim, S. M.(2003). Cluster: Survival Strategy Cluster of Korean Industry and Region. Seoul: Samsung Economic Research Institute(SERI).
  2. Chae, Y. S.(2016). Cluster Life Cycle Changes and Enterprise Dynamic Capabilities. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY POLICY 26(10), 22-27.
  3. Choi, J. Y., & Oh, G. S.(2010). Analyzing the Determinants for the Relocation of SW Companies in Seoul Metropolitan Area. Journal of Korea Planning Association, 45(6), 161-178.
  4. Choi, J. Y., & Oh, G. S.(2012). An Analysis on Inter-regional Relocation Patterns and Factors of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Firms. Journal of Korea Planning Association, 47(7), 5-20.
  5. Choi, J. Y.(2008). A pastoral counseling study on changes in mother-child relationship through marriage process, Doctoral dissertation, Yonsei University, Korea.
  6. Choi, C. H., & Ahn, D. H.(2010). Factors Affecting on New Firm Formation. Journal of Korea Planning Association, 45(2), 193-205.
  7. Chung, G. D., Im, J. B., & Chung, S. Y.(2017). A Study on the Success Factors of Innovation Cluster : A Case of the Pangyo Techno Valley in South Korea. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society 20(4), 970-988.
  8. Chung, S. Y.(2010). Strategic Management of Technology. Seoul :PAKYOUNGSA.
  9. Chung, S. Y.(2012). Technology and Management. Seoul: SIDAEGACHI.
  10. Chung, S. Y., Hwang, D. H., & Im, J. B.(2016). A Study on the Impact Factors for Innovation Cluster : A Case of the Pangyo Techno Valley. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 19(4), 848-872.
  11. Cooke, P.(2002). Knowledge Economies: Clusters, Learning and Coopreative Advantage. London: Routledge.
  12. Cooke, P.(2008). Regional Innovation Systems, Clean Technology & Jacobian Cluster-Platform Policies. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 1(1), 23-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-7802.2008.00002.x
  13. Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K.(2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323
  14. Eisenhardt, K. M.(1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
  15. Eisingerich, A. B., Bell, S. J., & Tracey, P.(2010). How can Clusters Sustain Performance? The Role of Network Strength, Network Openness and Environmental Uncertainty. Research Policy, 39(2), 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.007
  16. Fu, X., Zanello, G., Essegbey, G. O., Hou, J., & Mohnen, P.(2014). Innovation in low income countries: A survey report.
  17. Gagne, M., Townsend, S. H., Bourgeois, I., & Hart, R. E.(2010). Technology Cluster Evaluation and Growth Factors: Literature Review. Research Evaluation, 19(2), 82-90. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820210X510124
  18. Gyeonggido Business&Science Accelerator(2019). Pangyo Techno Valley Company's List. Retrieved (2019.03.15) from https://www.gbsa.or.kr/
  19. Gyeonggi Creative Economy Innovation Center(2018). Pangyo Innovative CEO Network Program Invitation, Retrieved (2018.12.05) from ccei.creativekorea.or.kr.
  20. Hagedoorn, J., & Schakenraad, J.(1994). The Effect of Strategic Technology Alliances on Company Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150404
  21. Han, U. Y., Nam, J. H., & Shin, K. J.(2010). In-depth report on industrial complex innovation cluster project, Eumseong: Korea Institute Of Science & Technology Evaluation And Planning(KISTEP).
  22. Hong, S. B., Im, D. S., & Kim, G. G.(2003). Characteristics and Types of Chinese Innovation Clusters in Comparison with Korean Cases. Policy Research(2003-22). Sejong:Science & Technology Policy Institute.
  23. Hong, Y. K.(2011). Grounded Theoric Approach in Curriculum Design and Reconstruction, Journal of Curriculum Integration, 5(2), 1-18.
  24. Hwang, G. J., & Ko, S. C.(2011). The Locational Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment Firms in Korea. Asian Studies, 14(3), 151-176.
  25. Hwang, H. R.(2007). Reorganization of global division of labor and innovation cluster development strategy. Science & Technology Policy(162), 32-46.
  26. Im, D. S., Kim, S. J., Sin, S. W., Hong, S. B., Oh, Y. H., Park, S. C., & Choi, J. I.(2008). The Policy Issues of Gwanggyo Techno-Valley and Its Operational Strategy. Policy Focus(2008-08), Suwon:Gyeonggi Research Institute.
  27. Im, G. G., Lee, J. Y., & Choi, J. H.(2017). A Comparative Study on the Industrial Cluster Cases for Job Creation from the Viewpoint of Sustainability and Open Innovation. Korean Management Science Review, 34(2), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.7737/KMSR.2017.34.2.085
  28. Im, J. B.(2013). The study on the effect of innovation cluster on firm's business activities :focusing on the innovation cluster in Gyeonggi-Province. Doctoral dissertation, Konkuk University, Korea.
  29. Im, J. B., Jung, S. Y., Lee, S. W., & Chung, S. Y.(2017). The Study on the Policy of the Innovation Cluster for Startups Incubation: Focus on Pangyo Creative Economic Valley in Gyeonggi-Province. Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association 28(4),109-130. https://doi.org/10.22885/KRDA.2016.28.4.109
  30. Inoue Tatsuhiko(2015). ブラックスワンの經營學 通說をくつがえした世界最優秀ケ-ススタディ. Tokyo: NIKKEI BP.
  31. Jeon, J. H., & Lee, C. W.(2018). The Significance and Issues of Resilience on Cluster Evolution. Journal of The Korean Association of Regional Geographers, 24(1), 66-82. https://doi.org/10.26863/JKARG.2018.02.24.1.66
  32. Jung, J. H.(2008). A Critical Review of New Economic Geographical Work regarding the Spatial Problem. Space and Environment, 30(1), 5-35.
  33. Kearney, A. K.(2010). Next Generation Economic Clusters. WQ Analyst.
  34. Kim, H. C.(2018), The Case Study on the Entrepreneurship Ecosystem in Pangyo Techno-Valley with Policy Implications. Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Society, 13(4), 166-194. https://doi.org/10.24878/tkes.2018.13.4.166
  35. Korea Institute of Industrial Economics & Trade(2016). Analysis of Current Status and Transfer Factors of Local Capital Companies.
  36. Kim, M. J.(2013). The Study on the Development Plan Research for Innovation Cluster with a Global Competitiveness: A Case Study on Gwanggyo Techno Valley, Pangyo Techno Vally and Ansan Science Valley in Gyeonggi. The Geographical Journal of Korea, 47(2), 143-157.
  37. Kim, S. W., Kang, I. S., Kim, J. I., Lee, S. U., & Choi, S. J.(2014). Innovation Cluster Success Factors and Developing Country Cluster Support Cases(2014-737). Sejong: Korea Institute of Industrial Economics & Trade.
  38. Kim, Y. R., & Seol, B. M.(2018). Exploratory Study on the Phenomena of Entrepreneurship Education in Food and Agriculture Sectors Focused on Educational Provider Based on the Grounded Theory Approach. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 13(5), 73-86.
  39. Kim, Y. J.(2018). Analysis on Firm Growth and Employment Capability across a Firm's Characteristics. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 40(2).
  40. Koo, Y. M.(2012). An Analysis of Cluster Life Cycle on the Dynamic Evolution of the Seoul Digital Industrial Complex in Korea. Journal of The Korean Association of Regional Geographers, 18(3), 283-297.
  41. Kwon, Y. G.(2016). Searching for Promotion Sustainability of Regional Culture Industry Clusters. Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association, 10(4), 25-40. https://doi.org/10.21184/jkeia.2016.08.10.4.25
  42. Lee, S. H., Sin, G. D., & Kim, T. G.(2014). Success and Implications of Pangyo Techno Valley. Issue&Analysis(137), Suwon:Gyeonggi Research Institute.
  43. Lee, S. W.(2018). Map of South Korea Apartment Wealth. Seoul: HanbitBiz.
  44. Lee, S. W., Im, J. B., & Jang, J. H.(2014). A Study on the Activation of A Craetive Ecosystem in Pan-gyo Technovalley. Community Development Review, 39(1), 11-19.
  45. Lee, W. I., & Jeong, U. J.(2011). Current Status of Pangyo Techno Valley and Challenges for Early Activation. GSTEP Policy Focus(2015-04). Pangyo:Gyeonggido Business&Science Accelerator(GBSA).
  46. Lee, W. Y.(2008). Economics of Innovation. Seoul: Saengneung Publisher.
  47. Lyon, T. P., & Baruffi Jr, R. A.(2011). Creating a Plug-In Electric Vehicle Industry Cluster in Michigan: Prospects and Policy Options. Mich. Telecomm & Tech. L. Rev., 18, 303.
  48. Martin, R., & Sunley, P.(2015). On the notion of regional economic resilience: conceptualization and explanation. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(1), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu015
  49. Ministry of Science and ICT(2018). Science, ICT Policy and Technology Trends. Retrieved (2019.02.23) from https://www.msit.go.kr/
  50. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy(2017). New Government's Industrial Policy Direction.
  51. Nam, K. B.(2004). The Paradox of Cluster Policy : Lessons from the Worst Practices. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 7(3), 407-432.
  52. National Institute of Korean Language(2018). Sustainability, Retrieved (2018.11.23) https://www.korean.go.kr/
  53. Naver Korean Dictionary(2018). Sustainability, Retrieved (2018.11.23) from https://ko.dict.naver.com/
  54. OECD(1999). Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach.
  55. Park, S. H., Oh, S. H., & Park, S. H.(2018). Design Thinking Methodology for Social Innovation using Big Data and Qualitative Research. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 13(4), 169-181. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.13.4.201808.169
  56. Porter, M. E.(1993). The competitive advantage of nations (pp. 73-93). Cambridge: Harvard Business School Management Programs.
  57. Porter, M. E.(1998). On Competition. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  58. Potter, A., & Watts, H.D.(2010). Evolutionary agglomeration theory: increasing returns, diminishing returns, and the industry life cycle. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(3), 417-455. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq004
  59. Seol, B. M., & Park, J. B.(2016). Exploratory Study on the Phenomenon of Technology Transfer in Livestock Industry Based on the Grounded Theory Approach: Backward Linkage Industries in Livestock Industry. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.11.1.201602.97
  60. Seol, B. M., Park, S. H., Park, J. B., & Kim, S. P.(2014). A Research on Entrepreneurship Education Recognition Based on Grounded Theory, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 9(3), 23-32.
  61. Seol, S. I.(2017). Industry-academic research and development system such as Silicon Valley. Economy Chosun, Retrieved (2018.11.23) from http://economy.chosun.com/
  62. Seong, Y. J., & Song, S. H.(2018). Pangyo Techno Valley Spreads as a Policy Export Product. Issue&Analysis(350). Suwon: Gyeonggi Research Institute.
  63. Sin, J. H., Yang, H. S., & Kim, C. H.(2018). The Effect of Sustainability as Innovation Objectives on Innovation Performance in the Service Industry. Journal of the Korean Society of Supply Chain Management, 18(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.25052/KSCM.2018.10.18.2.1
  64. So, J. G., Gwak, J. G., Jang, J. C., & Kim, M. J.(2015). Pangyo Techno Valley Growth Engine Analysis, GSTEP Policy Focus(2015-04). Pangyo:Gyeonggido Business&Science Accelerator(GBSA).
  65. Song, T. G., Jeong, D. S., & Jang, H. S.(2014). An Analysis on Satisfaction level of Companies in the Pangyo Techno Valley. Journal of Residential Environment, 12(4), 119-139.
  66. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J.(1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Procedures and Techniques for Developing grounded theory. San Jose: SAGE.
  67. The Brookings Institute(2018). Clusters and innovation districts: Lessons from the United States experience. Economic Studies at Brookings.
  68. WCED(1987). Our common future, Oxford University Press, 43.
  69. Wisepost(2018). Pangyo Techno Valley Development Evaluation and Development Plan Service Report. Pangyo: Gyeonggido Business&Science Accelerator(GBSA).
  70. 이원일.정의정(2011). 판교테크노밸리의 현황과 조기활성화를 위한 과제. GSTEP 정책연구(2011-02), 경기과학기술진흥원.
  71. 이후빈.김규식.권규상(2018). 클러스터의 진화와 토지 소유의 모순: 대구 남산동 인쇄골목을 사례로. 대한지리학회지. 53(2), 347-369.