DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Short-Term Exposure Levels on Ammonia and Hydrogen Sulfide During Manure-Handling Processes at Livestock Farms

  • Park, Jihoon (Environmental Safety Group, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Forschungsgesellschaft mbH) ;
  • Kang, Taesun (Department of Health and Safety Engineering, Semyung University) ;
  • Heo, Yong (Department of Occupational Health, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Lee, Kiyoung (Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Kyungran (National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Kyungsuk (National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Yoon, Chungsik (Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2019.07.24
  • Accepted : 2019.12.23
  • Published : 2020.03.30

Abstract

Background: Ammonia and hydrogen sulfide are harmful gases generated during aerobic/anaerobic bacterial decomposition of livestock manure. We evaluated ammonia and hydrogen sulfide concentrations generated from workplaces at livestock farms and determined environmental factors influencing the gas concentrations. Methods: Five commercial swine farms and five poultry farms were selected for monitoring. Real-time monitors were used to measure the ammonia and hydrogen sulfide concentrations and environmental conditions during the manure-handling processes. Monitoring was conducted in the manure storage facility and composting facility. Information on the farm conditions was also collected through interview and walk-through survey. Results: The ammonia concentrations were significantly higher at the swine composting facilities (9.5-43.2 ppm) than at other manure-handling facilities at the swine and poultry farms, and high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide were identified during the manure agitation and mixing process at the swine manure storage facilities (6.9-19.5 ppm). At the poultry manure-handling facilities, the ammonia concentration was higher during the manure-handling processes (2.6-57.9 ppm), and very low hydrogen sulfide concentrations (0-3.4 ppm) were detected. The air temperature and relative humidity, volume of the facility, duration of manure storage, and the number of animals influenced the gas concentrations. Conclusion: A high level of hazardous gases was generated during manure handling, and some levels increased up to risk levels that can threaten workers' health and safety. Some of the farm operational factors were also found to influence the gas levels. By controlling and improving these factors, it would be possible to protect workers' safety and health from occupational risks.

Keywords

References

  1. Blunden J, Aneja VP, Westerman PW. Measurement and analysis of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions from a mechanically ventilated swine confinement building in North Carolina. Atmos Environ 2008;42:3315-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.040
  2. Bottcher RW. An environmental nuisance: odor concentrated and transported by dust. Chem Senses 2001;26:327-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/26.3.327
  3. Donham KJ, Scallon LJ, Popendorf W, Treuhaft MW, Roberts RC. Characterization of dusts collected from swine confinement buildings. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1986;47:404-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298668691389955
  4. Jin Y, Lim TT, Ni JQ, Ha JH, Heber AJ. Emissions monitoring at a deep-pit swine finishing facility: Research methods and system performance. J Air Waste Manage 2012;62:1264-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2012.707163
  5. Schiffman SS, Graham BG, Williams CM. Dispersion modeling to compare alternative technologies for odor remediation at swine facilities. J Air Waste Manage 2008;58:1166-76. https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.58.9.1166
  6. Kaasik A, Maasikmets M. Chapter. 10. Microclimate and air quality in uninsulated loose-housing cowsheds in temperate climate conditions. In: Air quality and livestock farming. Leiden: CRC Press; 2018. p. 69-88.
  7. Hoff SJ, Bundy DS, Nelson MA, Zelle BC, Jacobson LD, Heber AJ, Ni J, Zhang Y, Koziel JA, Beasley DB. Emissions of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and odor before, during, and after slurry removal from a deep-pit swine finisher. J Air Waste Manage 2006;56:581-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464472
  8. Liu Z, Powers W, Murphy J, Maghirang R. Ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions from swine production facilities in North America: a meta-analysis. J Anim Sci 2014;92:1656-65. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7160
  9. Chen L, Hile ML, Fabian EE, Xu Z, Bruns MA, Brown V. Iron oxide to mitigate hydrogen sulfide gas release from gypsum-bedded dairy manure storages. T ASABE 2018;61:1101-12. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.12665
  10. Xu P, Koloutsou-Vakakis S, Rood MJ, Luan S. Projections of NH3 emissions from manure generated by livestock production in China to 2030 under six mitigation scenarios. Sci Total Environ 2017;607:78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.258
  11. Blanes-Vidal V, Sommer SG, Nadimi ES. Modelling surface pH and emissions of hydrogen sulphide, ammonia, acetic acid and carbon dioxide from a pig waste lagoon. Biosyst Eng 2009;104:510-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.09.008
  12. Blunden J, Aneja VP. Characterizing ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions from a swine waste treatment lagoon in North Carolina. Atmos Environ 2008;42:3277-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.02.026
  13. Blunden J, Aneja VP, Overton JH. Modeling hydrogen sulfide emissions across the gaseliquid interface of an anaerobic swine waste treatment storage system. Atmos Environ 2008;42:5602-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.03.016
  14. Rumsey IC, Aneja VP. Measurement and modeling of hydrogen sulfide lagoon emissions from a swine concentrated animal feeding operation. Environ Sci Technol 2014;48:1609-17. https://doi.org/10.1021/es403716w
  15. Kim KY, Ko HJ, Kim HT, Kim YS, Roh YM, Lee CM, Kim CN. Quantification of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emitted from pig buildings in Korea. J Environ Manage 2008;88:195-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.02.003
  16. Badjagbo K, Sauve S, Moore S. Real-time continuous monitoring methods for airborne VOCs. TrAC-Trend Anal Chem 2007;26:931-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2007.07.004
  17. Chai LL, Ni JQ, Chen Y, Diehl CA, Heber AJ, Lim TT. Assessment of long-term gas sampling design at two commercial manure-belt layer barns. J Air Waste Manage 2010;60:702-10. https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.60.6.702
  18. Dai XR, Blanes-Vidal V. Emissions of ammonia, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide from swine wastewater during and after acidification treatment: effect of pH, mixing and aeration. J Environ Manage 2013;115:147-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.019
  19. Kim Y, Evans RG, Iversen W, Pierce FJ. Instrumentation and control for wireless sensor network for automated irrigation. In: 2006 ASAE annual meeting 2006. Paper No. 061105.
  20. Mihina S, Sauter M, Palkovicova Z, Karandusovska I, Broucek J. Concentration of harmful gases in poultry and pig houses. Anim Sci Pap Rep 2012;30:395-406.
  21. Ni JQ, Chai L, Chen L, Bogan BW,Wang K, Cortus EL, Heber AJ, Lim TT, Diehl CA. Characteristics of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, and particulate matter concentrations in high-rise and manure-belt layer hen houses. Atmos Environ 2012;57:165-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.04.023
  22. Swestka RA. Wireless sensor network to quantify hydrogen sulfide concentrations in swine housing. Hydrogen sulfide spatial distribution and exposure in deep-pit swine housing. Graduate Theses and Dissertations of Iowa State University; 2010. Paper No.11416.
  23. Donham KJ. Human occupational hazards from swine confinement. Ann Am Conf Gov Ind Hyg 1982;2:137-42.
  24. Korean Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA). Case of domestic industrial accidents. Available from:http://www.kosha.or.kr/kosha/data/intoxication.do, . [Accessed 15 July 2019].
  25. Koerkamp PG, Metz J, Uenk G, Phillips V, Holden M, Sneath R, Short J, White R, Hartung J, Seedorf J. Concentrations and emissions of ammonia in livestock buildings in Northern Europe. J Agric Eng Res 1998;70:79-95. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1998.0275
  26. Arogo J, Westerman PW, Heber AJ, Robarge WP, Classen JJ. Ammonia emissions from animal feeding operations. Natl Cent Manure Anim Waste Manage White Pap 2002:41-88.
  27. Barrasa M, Lamosa S, Fernandez MD, Fernandez E. Occupational exposure to carbon dioxide, ammonia and hydrogen sulphide on livestock farms in northwest Spain. Ann Agric Env Med 2012;19:17-24.
  28. Dobeic M, S Pintaric. Laying hen and pig livestock contribution to aerial pollution in Slovenia. Acta Vet 2011;61:283-93. https://doi.org/10.2298/AVB1103283D
  29. Ni JQ, Heber A, Hanni S, Lim T, Diehl C. Characteristics of ammonia and carbon dioxide releases from layer hen manure. Brit Poult Sci 2010;51:326-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2010.495977
  30. Burton D, Beauchamp E. Nitrogen losses from swine housings. Agric Wastes 1986;15:59-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-4607(86)90126-5
  31. Hinz T, Linke S. A comprehensive experimental study of aerial pollutants in and emissions from livestock buildings. Part 2: Results. J Agric Eng Res 1998;70:119-29. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1998.0282
  32. Zhu J, Jacobson L, Schmidt D, Nicolai R. Daily variations in odor and gas emissions from animal facilities. Appl Eng Agric 2000;16:153-8. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.5067
  33. Chang C, Chung H, Huang CF, Su HJJ. Exposure assessment to airborne endotoxin, dust, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide in open style swine houses. Ann Occup Hyg 2001;45:457-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4878(00)00081-8
  34. Koger J, O'Brien B, Burnette R, Kai P, Van Kempen M, Van Heugten E, Van Kempen T. Manure belts for harvesting urine and feces separately and improving air quality in swine facilities. Livest Sci 2014;162:214-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.01.013

Cited by

  1. Electrochemical mitigation of hydrogen sulfide in deep-pit swine manure storage vol.777, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146048
  2. Fermented Coffee Grounds Diminish Livestock Odors: A Microbiome Study vol.11, pp.10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11101914