DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Exoscope versus operating microscope in microvascular surgery: A simulation non-inferiority trial

  • Pafitanis, Georgios (Group for Academic Plastic Surgery, Microvascular Anastomosis Simulation Hub, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London) ;
  • Hadjiandreou, Michalis (Barts' and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry) ;
  • Alamri, Alexander (Department of Neurosurgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust) ;
  • Uff, Christopher (Department of Neurosurgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust) ;
  • Walsh, Daniel (Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital) ;
  • Myers, Simon (Group for Academic Plastic Surgery, Microvascular Anastomosis Simulation Hub, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London)
  • Received : 2019.10.13
  • Accepted : 2020.04.02
  • Published : 2020.05.15

Abstract

Background The Exoscope is a novel high-definition digital camera system. There is limited evidence signifying the use of exoscopic devices in microsurgery. This trial objectively assesses the effects of the use of the Exoscope as an alternative to the standard operating microscope (OM) on the performance of experts in a simulated microvascular anastomosis. Methods Modus V Exoscope and OM were used by expert microsurgeons to perform standardized tasks. Hand-motion analyzer measured the total pathlength (TP), total movements (TM), total time (TT), and quality of end-product anastomosis. A clinical margin of TT was performed to prove non-inferiority. An expert performed consecutive microvascular anastomoses to provide the exoscopic learning curve until reached plateau in TT. Results Ten micro sutures and 10 anastomoses were performed. Analysis demonstrated statistically significant differences in performing micro sutures for TP, TM, and TT. There was statistical significance in TM and TT, however, marginal non-significant difference in TP regarding microvascular anastomoses performance. The intimal suture line analysis demonstrated no statistically significant differences. Non-inferiority results based on clinical inferiority margin (Δ) of TT=10 minutes demonstrated an absolute difference of 0.07 minutes between OM and Exoscope cohorts. A 51%, 58%, and 46% improvement or reduction was achieved in TT, TM, TP, respectively, during the exoscopic microvascular anastomosis learning curve. Conclusions This study demonstrated that experts' Exoscope anastomoses appear non-inferior to the OM anastomoses. Exoscopic microvascular anastomosis was more time consuming but end-product (patency) in not clinically inferior. Experts' "warm-up" learning curve is steep but swift and may prove to reach clinical equality.

Keywords

References

  1. Jacobson JH 2nd, Wallman LJ, Schumacher GA, et al. Microsurgery as an aid to middle cerebral artery endarterectomy. J Neurosurg 1962;19:108-15. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1962.19.2.0108
  2. Acland R. Signs of patency in small vessel anastomosis. Surgery 1972;72:744-8.
  3. Koshima I, Yamamoto T, Narushima M, et al. Perforator flaps and supermicrosurgery. Clin Plast Surg 2010;37:683-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2010.06.009
  4. Nishiyama K. From exoscope into the next generation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2017;60:289-93. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0202.003
  5. Robert E, Facca S, Atik T, et al. Vascular microanastomosis through an endoscopic approach: feasibility study on two cadaver forearms. Chir Main 2013;32:136-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.main.2013.01.002
  6. Zhu X, Luo J, Liu Y, et al. Screen-imaging guidance using a modified portable video macroscope for middle cerebral artery occlusion. Neural Regen Res 2012;7:912-6. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2012.12.006
  7. Sack J, Steinberg JA, Rennert RC, et al. Initial experience using a high-definition 3-dimensional exoscope system for microneurosurgery. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2018;14: 395-401. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opx145
  8. Olympus Corp. Launch of ORBEYE surgical microscope with 4K 3D capabilities [Internet]. Tokyo: Olympus Corp.; c2017 [cited 2020 May 8]. Available from: https://www.olympus-global.com/news/2017/nr00611.html?page=ir.
  9. Cheng HT, Ma H, Tsai CH, et al. A three-dimensional stereoscopic monitor system in microscopic vascular anastomosis. Microsurgery 2012;32:571-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.22035
  10. Piatkowski AA, Keuter XHA, Schols RM, et al. Potential of performing a microvascular free flap reconstruction using solely a 3D exoscope instead of a conventional microscope. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018;71:1664-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.07.032
  11. Mamelak AN, Danielpour M, Black KL, et al. A high-definition exoscope system for neurosurgery and other microsurgical disciplines: preliminary report. Surg Innov 2008;15: 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350608315954
  12. Oertel JM, Burkhardt BW. VITOM-3D for exoscopic neurosurgery: initial experience in cranial and spinal procedures. World Neurosurg 2017;105:153-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.109
  13. Rossini Z, Cardia A, Milani D, et al. VITOM 3D: preliminary experience in cranial surgery. World Neurosurg 2017; 107:663-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.083
  14. Ricciardi L, Chaichana KL, Cardia A, et al. The exoscope in neurosurgery: an innovative "point of view". A systematic review of the technical, surgical and educational aspects. World Neurosurg 2019;124:136-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.202
  15. Kang BY, Jeon BJ, Lee KT, et al. Comprehensive analysis of chicken vessels as microvascular anastomosis training model. Arch Plast Surg 2017;44:12-8. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.44.1.12
  16. Ghanem AM, Al Omran Y, Shatta B, et al. Anastomosis lapse index (ALI): a validated end product assessment tool for simulation microsurgery training. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016;32:233-41. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1568157
  17. Fitzgerald O'Connor E, Rozen WM, Chowdhry M, et al. The microvascular anastomotic coupler for venous anastomoses in free flap breast reconstruction improves outcomes. Gland Surg 2016;5:88-92.
  18. Institution for Innovation and Improvement. Improving quality and efficiency in the operating theatre [Internet]. Coventry: NHS; c2019 [cited 2020 Apr 13]. Available from: http://harmfreecare.org/wp-content/files_mf/Improving-quality-and-efficiency-in-the-operating-theatre.pdf.
  19. Krishnan KG, Scholler K, Uhl E. Application of a compact high-definition exoscope for illumination and magnification in high-precision surgical procedures. World Neurosurg 2017;97:652-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.037
  20. Shirzadi A, Mukherjee D, Drazin DG, et al. Use of the video telescope operating monitor (VITOM) as an alternative to the operating microscope in spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:E1517-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182709cef
  21. Moisi MD, Hoang K, Tubbs RS, et al. Advancement of surgical visualization methods: comparison study between traditional microscopic surgery and a novel robotic optoelectronic visualization tool for spinal surgery. World Neurosurg 2017;98:273-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.003
  22. Chan W, Niranjan N, Ramakrishnan V. Structured assessment of microsurgery skills in the clinical setting. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:1329-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.06.024
  23. van Mulken TJM, Boymans CAEM, Schols RM, et al. Preclinical experience using a new robotic system created for microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;142:1367-76. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004939
  24. Birch K, Drazin D, Black KL, et al. Clinical experience with a high definition exoscope system for surgery of pineal region lesions. J Clin Neurosci 2014;21:1245-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2013.10.026
  25. Beez T, Munoz-Bendix C, Beseoglu K, et al. First clinical applications of a high-definition three-dimensional exoscope in pediatric neurosurgery. Cureus 2018;10:e2108.

Cited by

  1. Visualization and Maneuverability Features of a Robotic Arm Three-Dimensional Exoscope and Operating Microscope for Clipping an Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: Video Comparison and Technical Evaluat vol.22, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000015
  2. High‐definition 3D exoscope‐assisted soft palate excision and reconstruction vol.44, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.26864