DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Double-diffusive convection affected by conductive and insulating side walls during physical vapor transport of Hg2Br2

  • Kim, Geug Tae (Department of Chemical Engineering, Hannam University) ;
  • Kwon, Moo Hyun (Department of Energy and Electrical Engineering, Woosuk University)
  • Received : 2020.05.25
  • Accepted : 2020.06.05
  • Published : 2020.06.30

Abstract

In last few decades, although thermal and/or solutal buoyancy-driven recirculating flows in a closed ampoule have been intensively studies as a model problem, there exist interesting total molar flux of Hg2Br2 that have been unreported in the literature. It is concluded that the total molar flux of Hg2Br2(A) increases linearly and directly as the temperature difference regions in the range of 10℃ ≤ ΔT ≤ 50°, 3.5 × 103 ≤ Grt ≤ 4.08 × 103, 4.94 × 104 ≤ Grs ≤ 6.87 × 104. For the range of 10 Torr ≤ PB ≤ 150 Torr, the total molar flux of Hg2Br2(A) decays second order exponentially as the partial pressure of component B (argon as an impurity), PB increases. From the view point of energy transport, the fewer the partial pressure of component B (argon), PB is, the more the energy transport is achieved.

Keywords

1. Introduction

During the past few decades one area of interest in double diffusion has been the study of the physical vapor transport (PVT) processes in a sealed chamber. In recent years, the problems of Cattaneo-Christov double diffusion have been studied for Williamson nanomaterials slip flow subject to porous medium [1], and bi-directional stretched nanofluid flow with Cattaneo-Christov double diffusion [2]. Muhammad et al. [3] addressed Darcy-Forchheimer flow over an exponentially stretching curved surface with Cattaneo-Christov double diffusion. Asha and Sunitha [4] reported thermal radiation and hall effects on peristaltic blood flow with double diffusion in the presence of nanoparticles.

Mercurous halide materials are well known as the most promising materials in applications for acoustooptic materials and signal processing optics, for example, Bragg cells. Singh and his group investigated systematically the growth and characterization and development of large single crystals of Hg2Br2 [5-11]. Many reports of Hg2Br2 could be found in references [12-16]. Kim and his coworkers [17-19] have performed twodimensional numerical studies of double diffusion convection in the vapor phase during physical vapor crystal growth. Duval [20] published that four flow structure regions appear during the physical vapor transport of mercurous chloride crystal growth.

Our numerical simulations are motivated by the desire to study the influences of hybrid thermal boundary conditions on the convective flow because the final quality of crystal is affected by convection fields. In this paper, the effects of the temperature differences between the source and crystal, the Peclet number, Pe, and the partial pressure of component B (argon as inert gas), PB on the total molar flux of Hg2Br2 and the maximum magnitudes of velocity vector, |U|max in the dimensional unit (cm/sec) shall be addressed.

2. Numerical Simulations

Consider steady state thermal and solutal buoyancy driven recirculating flows of Hg2Br2(A)-argon (B) with thermo-physical properties listed in Table 1, in PVT crystal growth enclosure for hybrid thermal boundary conditions with linear temperature profiles, i.e., conductive walls, and insulating walls, shown in Fig. 1, accompanied by a 42 × 22 (x × y) grid system. The detailed assumptions and nomenclature can be found in reference [17]. Also, the dimensionless parameters of Prandtl, Lewis, Peclet, Grashof, concentration, aspect ratio are described in reference [20].

Table 1. Thermo-physical properties of Hg2Br2(A)-argon (B) (MA = 560.988, MB = 39.944) at \(\Delta\)T = 50ºC, PB = 10 Torr

 Kinematic viscosity
 Thermal diffusivity
 Binary diffusivity
 Coefficient of thermal volume expansion
 Density of mixture
 Prandtl number
 Lewis number
 Peclet number
 Concentration number
 Thermal Grashof number
 Solutal Grashof number
 0.44 cm2/sec
 0.45 cm2/sec2 
 1.28 cm2/sec2
 0.0017 (1/ºC)
 0.000599 g/cm3
 0.97
 0.35
 3.65
 1.02
 3.5 × 103
 4.94 × 104

 

Fig.1.jpg 이미지

Fig. 1. System schematic and coordinates for numerical simulation of PVT crystal growth reactor of Hg2Br2(A)-argon (B).

In non-dimensional form, continuity, Navier-Stokes momenta, energy transport, and mass transport are governed by:

The boundary conditions corresponding to the above equations (1) to (4) are given as follows:

On the walls

(0 < x*< 1, y*= 0 and 1):

(0 < x*< 3, y*= 0 and 1):

(3 < x*< 4, y*= 0 and 1):

On the source (x*=0,  0 < y*< 1 ):

\(\nu (0,y^{*})=0,\)
 

\(T ^{*}(0,y^{*})=1,\)

\(\omega _{A}^{*}(0,y^{*})=1.\)

On the crystal (x*= L/H,  0 < y*< 1 ):

\(\nu (L/H,y^{*})=0,\)

\(T ^{*}(L/H,y^{*})=0,\)

\(\omega _{A}^{*}(L/H,y^{*})=0.\)

The code verification of one’s results can be found in reference [17], for the Semi-Implicit Method Pressure-Linked Equations Revised (SIMPLER) [21].

3. Results and Discussion

When MA \(\neq \)MB, the two molecular weights of Hg2Br2 and argon are different, i.e., MA = 560.988 g/gmol, MB =39.944 g/gmol, solutally buoyancy driven convection is much important compared with thermally buoyancy driven convection, but solutal and/or thermal convection are coupled and the effects of thermal buoyancy convection cannot be neglected during the physical vapor transport of Hg2Br2 in the vapor phase. Therefore, our interest is restricted on our studies to investigate the relations of the driving force, the temperature difference, \(\Delta \)T, the maximum magnitudes of velocity vector, |U|max and the Peclet number for the transport of crystal species. 

As shown in Fig. 2, it is clear that the total molar flux of Hg2Br2(A) increases linearly and directly as the temperature difference in the range of 10ºC \(\leq\)\(\Delta \)T \(\leq\) 50ºC, 3.5 × 103\(\leq\)Grt\(\leq\)4.08×103, 4.94×104\(\leq\)Grs\(\leq\)6.87×104. For \(\Delta \)T= 10ºC, the corresponding thermal (Grt) and solutal (Grs) Grashof number is 4.08× 103and 6.87 × 104, respectively; for \(\Delta \)T=50ºC, the corresponding thermal (Grt) and solutal (Grs) Grashof number is 3.5×103 and 4.94×104, respectively. With increasing the temperature difference, the corresponding thermal (Grt) and solutal(Grs) Grashof number reversely decrease, which reflected the variations in the density of the mixture of Hg2Br2 and argon. In other words, for \(\Delta \)T=10ºC, the kinematic viscosity is 0.18 cm2/sec; for \(\Delta \)T = 50ºC, the kinematic viscosity is 0.44 cm2/sec. The system considered in Fig.1 is Ar (aspect ratio, transport length-to-width) = 4, Ts (source temperature)= 300ºC, PB (partial pressure of component B, argon) = 10 Torr, on earth. For \(\Delta \)T=10ºC, the thermal diffusivity and binary mass diffusivity is 0.18, and 1.28 cm2/sec; for \(\Delta \)T=50ºC, the thermal diffusivity and binary mass diffusivity is 0.45, and 1.28 cm2/sec. For the range of 10ºC\(\leq\)\(\Delta \)T\(\leq\)30ºC, the total molar flux of Hg2Br2(A) increases sharply with increasing the temperature difference, whereas for the range of 30ºC\(\leq\)\(\Delta \)T\(\leq\)50ºC, the total molar flux of Hg2Br2(A) increases relatively gradually. As mentioned before, this difference is likely be due to the variations in the density of the mixture of Hg2Br2 and argon.

Fig.2.jpg 이미지

Fig. 2. The total molar flux of Hg2Br2(A) as a function of the temperature difference, \(\Delta \)T (ºC), based on aspect ratio = 4, Ts =300ºC, PB = 10Torr, 3.5 × 103\(\leq\)Grt \(\leq\)4.08 × 103, 4.94 × 104\(\leq\)Grs \(\leq\)6.87 × 104, on earth.

Figure 3 illustrates the effects of Peclet number, Pe on as the temperature difference, \(\Delta \)T in the range of 10ºC\(\leq\)\(\Delta \)T\(\leq\)50ºC, 3.5 × 103\(\leq\)Grt \(\leq\)4.08 × 103, 4.94 × 104\(\leq\)Grs \(\leq\)6.87 × 104. The Peclet number, Pe increases linearly and directly with the temperature differences. Figure 4 shows the relation of the maximum magnitude of velocity vector, |U|max and Peclet number, Pe for 10ºC\(\leq\)\(\Delta \)T\(\leq\)50ºC, aspect ratio = 4, Ts = 300ºC, PB = 10 Torr, on earth. This relation illustrates that the |U|max increases linearly with the Peclet number, Pe. Note that the Peclet number is at the source and the crystal regions. 

Fig.3.jpg 이미지

Fig. 3. The Peclet number, Pe as a function of the temperature difference, \(\Delta \)T (ºC), based on aspect ratio = 4, Ts = 300ºC, PB =10Torr, 3.5 × 103\(\leq\)Grt \(\leq\)4.08×103, 4.94 × 104\(\leq\)Grs \(\leq\)6.87 × 104, on earth.

Fig.4.jpg 이미지

Fig. 4. The |U|max as a function of the dimensionless Peclet number, Pe, based on aspect ratio = 4, Ts = 300ºC, PB = 10 Torr, 3.5 ×103\(\leq\)Grt\(\leq\)4.08 × 103, 4.94×104\(\leq\)Grs \(\leq\)6.87 × 104, on earth.

Figure 5 shows the profiles of velocity vector, streamline, temperature, mass concentration, based on aspect ratio = 4, \(\Delta \)T=50ºC (300ºC→250ºC), PB =10Torr, |U|max =1.87 cm/sec, on earth. As plotted in Fig. 5, there exists small one convective cell in the vapor phase, and the flow structure is asymmetrical against at y*= 0.5 and three-dimensional flow structure. For the flow regions along the transport length at the bottom region, i.e., 0\(\leq\)y*\(\leq\)0.5, the one-dimensional Stefan flows appear. Temperature profile shown in Fig. 5(c) is related to the hybrid thermal boundary conditions; for 0\(\leq\)x*\(\leq\)1, conductive walls and for 1\(\leq\)x*\(\leq\)3, insulating walls, for 3\(\leq\)x*\(\leq\)4, conductive walls. Close spacings of mass concentration shown in Fig. 5(d) exhibits the mechanism of the diffusion-limited mass transfer. 

Fig.5.jpg 이미지

Fig. 5. (a) Velocity vector, (b) streamline, (c) temperature, (d) mass concentration profile, based on aspect ratio = 4, \(\Delta \)T = 50ºC(300ºC→250ºC), PB = 10Torr, Peclet number = 3.65, thermal Grashof number (Grt) = 3.5 × 103, solutal Grashof number (Grs) =4.94 × 104, Prandtl number = 0.97, Lewis number = 0.35, concentration parameter = 1.02, total pressure = 108 Torr, |U|max = 1.87 cm/sec, on earth.

Figure 6 shows the effects of the partial pressure of component B (argon), PB, on the total molar flux of Hg2Br2(A), for 10 Torr\(\leq\)PB\(\leq\)150 Torr, based on aspect ratio = 4, \(\Delta \)T=50ºC, Ts = 300ºC, PB = 10 Torr, 1.8 × 103\(\leq\)Grt \(\leq\)2.9×103, 2.6×104\(\leq\)Grs \(\leq\)4.9×104, on earth. For the range of 10 Torr\(\leq\)PB\(\leq\)150 Torr, the total molar flux of Hg2Br2(A) decays second order exponentially with the partial pressure of component B (argon), PB. Figure 7 shows the influences of the partial pressure of component B (argon), PB, on the Peclet number, Pe, for 10Torr\(\leq\)PB\(\leq\)150 Torr, corresponding to Fig. 6. 

Fig.6.jpg 이미지

Fig. 6. The total molar flux of Hg2Br2(A) as the partial pressure of component B, PB, based on aspect ratio = 4, \(\Delta \)T = 50ºC, Ts = 300ºC, PB = 10Torr, 1.8 × 103\(\leq\)Grt \(\leq\)2.9×103, 2.6×104\(\leq\)Grs \(\leq\)4.9 × 104, on earth.

Fig.7.jpg 이미지

Fig. 7. The Peclet number, Pe as the partial pressure of component B, PB, \(\Delta \)T (ºC), based on aspect ratio = 4, Ts = 300ºC, PB = 10Torr, 3.5×103\(\leq\)Grt \(\leq\)4.6×103, 4.9×104\(\leq\)Grs \(\leq\)5.6×104, on earth.

Figure 8 shows the profiles of velocity vector, streamline, temperature, mass concentration, based on aspect ratio = 4, \(\Delta \)T=50ºC (300ºC→250ºC), PB =60Torr, |U|max =0.99 cm/sec, on earth. As shown in Fig. 8, one convective roll is present in the vapor phase. In a comparison of Fig. 8(c) temperature with Fig. 5(c) temperature, from the view point of energy transport, the fewer the partial pressure of component B (argon), PB is, the more the energy transport is achieved.

Fig.8.jpg 이미지

Fig. 8. (a) Velocity vector, (b) streamline, (c) temperature, (d) mass concentration profile, based on aspect ratio = 4, \(\Delta \)T=50ºC (300ºC→250ºC), PB = 60Torr, Peclet number=2.19, thermal Grashof number (Grt) = 3.8×103, solutal Grashof number (Grs)=5.07×104, Prandtl number=0.92, Lewis number=0.51, concentration parameter=1.12, total pressure=158 Torr, |U|max = 0.99 cm/sec, on earth.

4. Conclusions

It is concluded that the total molar flux of Hg2Br2(A) increases linearly and directly as the temperature difference, \(\Delta \)T in the range of 10ºC\(\leq\)\(\Delta \)T\(\leq\)50ºC, 3.5×103\(\leq\)Grt \(\leq\)4.08 × 103, 4.94×104\(\leq\)Grs \(\leq\)6.87×104. For the range of 10 Torr\(\leq\)PB\(\leq\)150 Torr, the total molar flux of Hg2Br2(A) decays second order exponentially with the partial pressure of component B (argon), PB. From the view point of energy transport, the fewer the partial pressure of component B (argon), PB i s, the m ore the energy transport is achieved.

Acknowledgement

This work was financially supported by the LINC+ project Grant No. 2019BG042010106 (July 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019).

References

  1. M.I. Khana, F. Alzahrani, A. Hobiny and Z. Ali, "Modeling of Cattaneo-Christov double diffusions (CCDD) in Williamson nanomaterial slip flow subject to porous medium", J. Materials Res. Tech. (2020) in press.
  2. I. Ahmad, M. Faisal and T. Javed, "Bi-directional stretched nanofluid flow with Cattaneo-Christov double diffusion", Results Phys. 15 (2019) 102581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102581
  3. T. Muhammad, K. Rafique, M. Asma and M. Alghamdi, "Darcy-Forchheimer flow over an exponentially stretching curved surface with Cattaneo-Christov double diffusion", Physica A (2020) in press.
  4. S.K. Asha and G. Sunitha, "Thermal radiation and Hall effects on peristaltic blood flow with double diffusion in the presence of nanoparticles", Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 17 (2020) 100560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2019.100560
  5. K.A. McCarthy, A.P. Goutzoulis, M. Gottlieb and N.B. Singh, "Optical rotatory power in crystals of the mercurous halides and tellurium dioxide", Opt. Commun. 64 (1987) 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4018(87)90043-5
  6. R. Mazelsky and D.K. Fox, "Development of large single crystals for electronic, electro-optic and acoustooptic devices", Prog. Crystal Growth and Charact. 15 (1987) 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-3535(87)90002-5
  7. N.B. Singh, M. Gottlieb, A.P. Goutzoulis, R.H. Hopkins and R. Mazelsky, "Mercurous Bromide acoustooptic devices", J. Cryst. Growth 89 (1988) 527. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(88)90215-1
  8. N.B. Singh, M. Marshall, M. Gottlieb, G.B. Brandt, R.H. Hopkins, R. Mazelsky, W.M.B. Duval and M.E. Glicksman, "Purification and characterization of mercurous halides", J. Cryst. Growth 106 (1990) 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(90)90287-U
  9. N.B. Singh, M. Gottlieb and R. Mazelsky, "The optical quality of mercurous halides crystals", J. Cryst. Growth 128 (1993) 1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(07)80096-0
  10. N.B. Singh, M. Gottlieb, R.H. Hopkins, R. Mazelsky, W.M.B. Duval and M.E. Glicksman "Physical vapor transport growth of mercurous chloride crystals", Prog. Crystal Growth and Charact. 27 (1993) 201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8974(93)90024-X
  11. N.B. Singh, M. Gottlieb, G.B. Branddt, A.M. Stewart, R.H. Hopkins, R. Mazelsky and M.E. Glicksman, "Growth and characterization of mercurous halide crystals: mercurous bromide system", J. Cryst. Growth 137 (1994) 155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(94)91265-3
  12. A.A. Kaplyanskii, V.V. Kulakov, Yu.F. Markov and C. Barta, "The soft mode properties in Raman spectra of improper ferroelastics $Hg_2Cl_2$ and $Hg_2Br_2$", Solid State Commun. 21 (1977) 1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(77)90010-2
  13. M. Dalmon, S. Nakashima, S. Komatsubara and A. Mitsuishi, "Softening of acoustic and optical modes in ferroelstic phase in $Hg_2Br_2$", Solid State Commun. 28 (1978) 815. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(78)91352-2
  14. J.S. Kim, S.B. Trivedi, J. Soos, N. Gupta and W. Palosz, "Growth of $Hg_2Cl_2$ and $Hg_2Br_2$ single crystals by physical vapor transport", J. Cryst. Growth 310 (2008) 2457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.12.067
  15. T.H. Kim, H.T. Lee, Y.M. Kang, G.E. Jang, I.H. Kwon and B. Cho, "In-depth investigation of $Hg_2Br_2$ crystal growth and evolution", Materials 12 (2019) 4224. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12244224
  16. P.M. Amarasinghe, J.S. Kim, H. Chen, S. Trivedi, S.B. Qadri, J. Soos, M. Diestler, D. Zhang, N. Gupta and J.L. Jensen, "Growth of high quality mercurous halide sing crystals by physical vapor transport method for AOM and radiation detection applications", J. Cryst. Growth 450 (2016) 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2016.06.025
  17. G.T. Kim and M. H. Kwon, "Effects of solutally dominant convection on physical vapor transport for a mixture of $Hg_2Br_2$ and $Br_2$ under microgravity environments", Korean Chem. Eng. Res. 52 (2014) 75. https://doi.org/10.9713/kcer.2014.52.1.75
  18. G.T. Kim and M.H. Kwon, "Numerical analysis of the influences of impurity on diffusive-convection flow fields by physical vapor transport under terrestrial and microgravity conditions: with application to mercurous chloride", Appl. Chem. Eng. 27 (2016) 335. https://doi.org/10.14478/ace.2016.1028
  19. S.H. Ha and G.T. Kim, "Preliminary studies on doublediffusive natural convection during physical vapor transport crystal growth of $Hg_2Br_2$ for the spaceflight experiments", Korean Chem. Eng. Res. 57 (2019) 289. https://doi.org/10.9713/kcer.2019.57.2.289
  20. W.M.B. Duval, "Transition to chaos in the physical transport process-I", the Proceeding of the ASME-- WAM Winter Annual meeting, Fluid mechanics phenomena in microgravity, ASME-WAM, Nov. 28 -- Dec. 3, New Orleans, Louisiana (1993).
  21. S.V. Patankar, "Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow" (Hemisphere Publishing Corp. Washington D.C. 1980) p. 131.