한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제40권3호
  • /
  • Pages.237-251
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

환경 문제의 통합적 이해를 위한 국내외 연구 동향 분석 -탄소 순환 주제의 과학 교육을 중심으로-

An Analysis of Research Trend for Integrated Understanding of Environmental Issues: Focusing on Science Education Research on Carbon Cycle

  • 투고 : 2019.11.30
  • 심사 : 2020.07.02
  • 발행 : 2020.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

인류가 직면한 지구온난화와 같은 기후 변화에 대한 이슈는 우리의 삶에 직접적인 영향을 미치는 매우 중요한 문제로 이를 극복하기 위해서는 탄소 순환에 대한 통합적 이해를 바탕으로 대기 중 이산화탄소 등의 온실기체 방출량 감축이 필수적이다. 이 연구의 목적은 탄소 순환 교육에 대한 국내외 연구동향을 분석하여, 미래 시민으로 성장할 학생들을 위한 탄소 순환 교육의 가치와 방향을 제시하는데 있다. 이를 위해 '탄소 순환 교육'과 관련하여 국내외 다양한 학술연구 데이터베이스 (RISS, KCI, Google 학술검색, ERIC 등)에서 수집된 52편의 연구들을 대상으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 탄소 순환 교육을 위해 많은 연구들이 다양한 형태로 이루어져 왔으나, 개발된 프로그램의 낮은 활용 가능성과 검증의 필요성, 정밀하고 일괄적인 학생인식과 수준 조사 도구 개발의 필요성, 교수·학습 모형과 교사를 대상으로 한 관련 연구의 필요성, 교사의 탄소 순환 교육을 위한 자료의 필요성, 그리고 다양한 주제와 소재의 활용이 필요한 것으로 확인되었다. 지구온난화를 포함한 지구 환경 변화에 능동적으로 대처하기 위해서는 학생들의 탄소 순환에 대한 통합적인 이해가 중요하다. 이러한 학습 기회를 지원하기 위해 기존에 개발된 프로그램의 검증을 바탕으로 교육 현장에서 활용할 수 있도록 제공하고, 학생들의 탄소 순환에 대한 이해 수준을 높이고 오개념을 개선할 수 있도록 생활속에서 적용할 수 있는 실질적인 형태의 내용을 교육과정에 포함할 필요가 있다. 또한 교사의 전문성 향상을 위해 다양한 소재와 주제를 포함하는 탄소 순환 교육 사례에 대해 교사 연수를 통해 제공되어야 할 것이다.

Issues on climate change we are facing, such as global warming, are very important as it affects our lives directly. To overcome this, efforts to reduce greenhouse gases emissions (e.g., carbon dioxide) are necessary and these efforts should be based on our integrated understanding of carbon cycle. The purpose of this study is to examine the research trend on carbon cycle education and to suggest the value and direction of carbon cycle education for students who will be citizens of the future. We analyzed 52 carbon cycle education related studies collected from academic research databases (RISS, KCI, ERIC, Google Scholar, and others). As a result, we conclude that resources are still limited and more researches on verification and utilization of developed program, development of accurate and comprehensive tools for students' recognition and level assessment, developing educational model or teacher professional development, providing more appropriate curriculum resources, and the use of various topics or materials for carbon cycle education are necessary. Students' comprehensive understanding of the carbon cycle is important to actively react to the changes in the global environment. Therefore, to support such learning opportunities, resources that can be connected to students' daily experiences to improve students' understanding of carbon cycle and replace misconceptions based on the verification of existing programs should be provided in the classroom as well as the curriculum. In addition, sufficient exemplary cases in carbon cycle education including various materials and topics should be provided through professional development to support teachers teaching strategies with carbon cycle.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aengenheyster, M., Feng, Q. Y., Van Der Ploeg, F., & Dijkstra, H. A. (2018). The point of no return for climate action. Earth System Dynamics, 9(3), 1085-1095. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1085-2018
  2. Antonarakis, A. (2018). Linking carbon and water cycles with forests. Geography, 103(1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2018.12094029
  3. Asshoff, R., Riedl, S., & Leuzinger, S. (2010). Towards a better understanding of carbon flux. Journal of Biological Education, 44(4), 180-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2010.9656219
  4. Bae, K.-J., & Park, H.-J. (2013). A study on the current condition and the improvement of digital literacy education. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(2), 241-265. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.2.201306.241
  5. Bang, D., Park, E., Yoon, H., Kim, J., Lee, Y., Park, J., Song, J. Y., Dong, H., Shim, B. J., Lim, H. J., & Lee, H. (2013). The design of integrated science curriculum framework based on big ideas. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(5), 1041-1054. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.5.1041
  6. Baptist von Helmont, J. (1662). Physics refined (trans. by K. J. Chandler). London, UK: Cited by Boll, (1999).
  7. Bissinger, K., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). Environmental literacy in practice: education on tropical rainforests and climate change. Environment, development and sustainability, 20(5), 2079-2094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9978-9
  8. Bord, R. J., O'connor, R. E., & Fisher, A. (2000). In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/301
  9. Brehm, S., Anderson, C. W., & DuBay, J. (1986). Ecology: A teaching module (Occasional Paper No. 94). East Lansing, MI: The Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.
  10. Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2015). Comparing American and Chinese Students& Learning Progression on Carbon Cycling in Socio-Ecological Systems. Science Education International, 26(4), 439-462.
  11. Cheong, C. (2011). Middle school students' perceptions about global environmental problems using drawings. Korean Journal of Environmental Education, 24(1), 76-87.
  12. Cho. K. (1995). Learning and teaching strategies to correct misconception in nature subject: Focusing on oxygen and carbon dioxide unit. Research of Science.Mathematics Education, 18, 29-36.
  13. Choi, Y.-H., Noh, J.-A., Lee, B.-U., Moon, D.-Y., Lee, M.-H., Chang, Y.-C., Park, G.-M., Son, D.-M., Lim, Y.-J., & Lee, E.-S. (2012). Development of STEAM curriculum model for cultivating of creative and integrative thinking person. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 12(3), 63-87.
  14. Clary, R., & Wandersee, J. (2010). Connect-the-spheres with the coal cycle. Science Scope, 34(2), 20-29.
  15. Clary, R., & Wandersee, J. (2015). Finding the CO2 culprit. Science Teacher, 82(3), 23-29.
  16. Cockerill, K. (2010). Communicating how water works: results from a community water education program. The Journal of Environmental Education, 41(3), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960903295266
  17. Crawford-Brown, D., & LaRocca, S. (2006). Teaching Systems Principles and Policy Applications Using a Reduced-Scale Carbon Cycle Model for Global Warming. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54(3), 301-333. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-54.3.301
  18. Dijkstra, E., & Goedhart, M. (2011). Evaluation of authentic science projects on climate change in secondary schools: A focus on gender differences. Research in Science &Technological Education, 29(2), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2011.581631
  19. Drouin, P., Welty, D. J., Repeta, D., Engle-Belknap, C. A., Cramer, C., Frashure, K., & Chen, R. (2006). Seeing the Carbon Cycle. Science Scope, 29(4), 14-18.
  20. Dusing, K., Asshoff, R., & Hammann, M. (2018). Students& conceptions of the carbon cycle: Identifying and interrelating components of the carbon cycle and tracing carbon atoms across the levels of biological organisation. Journal of Biological Education, 53(1), 110-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1447002
  21. Gallego-Schmid, A., Rivera, X. C. S., & Stamford, L. (2018). Introduction of life cycle assessment and sustainability concepts in chemical engineering curricula. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(3), 442-458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2017-0146
  22. Gardner, J., Harlen, W., Hayward, L., & Stobart, G. (2008). Changing assessment practice: Process, principles and practice. London: Assessment Reform Group.
  23. Gudovitch, Y., & Orion, N. (2001). The Carbon Cycle and the Earth Systems: Studying the Carbon Cycle in Multidisciplinary Environmental Context. In Proceedings of the 1st IOSTE Symposium in Southern Europe. (April 29-May 2).
  24. Han, J., Jeong, Y., & Noh, T. (2000). The conceptions of high school students about acid rain, ozone layer, and greenhouse effect. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(3), 364-370.
  25. Hartley, L. M., Wilke, B. J., Schramm, J. W., D Avanzo, C., D'Anderson, C. W. (2011). College students' understanding of the carbon cycle: Contrasting principle-based and informal reasoning. BioScience, 61, 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.1.12
  26. Higgins, P. A., & Harte, J. (2012). Carbon cycle uncertainty increases climate change risks and mitigation challenges. Journal of Climate, 25(21), 7660-7668. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00089.1
  27. Hwang, H. T. (2019). Japanese typhoon heavy rain damage... 'Attention for disaster prevention housing'. Retrieved October 31, 2019, from http://news.kbs.co.kr/news/view.do?ncd=4314404&ref=A
  28. Hwang, H.-Y., & Kim. Y. (2012). The educational strategy for sustainable development. The Journal of Education Assignment Institute, 18(5), 108-132.
  29. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (1990). Climate Change: The IPCC scientific assessment. In J. T. Houghton, G. J. Jenkins, & J. J. Ephraums (Eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (1995). IPCC Second Assessment: Climate change 1995. In J. T. Houghton, L. G. M. Filho et al., (Eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (2001). Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of working group I to the Third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Gnggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden, X. Oai, K. Maskell, & C. A. Johnson (Eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
  33. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
  34. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (2018). Climate change 2018: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
  35. Jang, S.-Y., & Shin, D. (2013). An analysis on recent trend of research about climate change and energy education. Journal of Energy and Climate Change Education, 3(2), 115-125.
  36. Jin, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). A learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1149-1180. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21051
  37. Jin, H., Mehl, C. E., & Lan, D. H. (2015). Developing an analytical framework for argumentation on energy consumption issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(8), 1132-1162. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21237
  38. Joyce, C., Viola, T., & Amster, A. (2011). Understanding Ocean Acidification (Ocean Acidification Teachers Guide).
  39. Jun, W. (2014). A study on development of green IT education contents for elementary school students. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 18(1), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.1.89
  40. Kim, B. (2018). The impact of community-based environmental education programs on elementary school students' ecological literacy. Global Studies Education, 10(2), 65-96. https://doi.org/10.19037/agse.10.2.03
  41. Kim, C. (2017). Trends and directions in research on education for sustainable development (ESD) in Korean Journal of Environmental Education (1994-2017). Korean Journal of Environmental Education, 30(4), 353-377. https://doi.org/10.17965/KJEE.2017.30.4.353
  42. Kim, W. K. (2016, June 16). Hot Korea ... Temperature changed over 104 years. Retrieved January 20, 2019, from http://news.kbs.co.kr/news/view.do?ncd=3296560
  43. Kim, Y. & Hwang, G. (2013). Utilization of bottle-deposit system for climate change education. Journal of Energy and Climate Change Education, 3(2), 161-169.
  44. Kim, Y. G. (2012). Effect of educational materials from normal energy usage receipt on saving energy in houses. Journal of Energy and Climate Change Education. 2(2), 153-163.
  45. King, C. (2014). The Earth Science Education Unit's professional development workshop on "The carbon question-cycling, releasing, capturing" for teachers of key stages 3 and 4. School Science Review, 96(354), 123-129.
  46. Ko, Y. S., Kim, S. K., & Lee, H. K. (2004). A study about improvement of experiment of carbon dioxide production on elementary school science textbook. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 23(2), 152-158.
  47. Kook, D. S. (2003). An analysis of 10th grade science textbook as an origin of misconception on greenhouse effect concept. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23(5), 592-598.
  48. Krauskopf, S. (2010). A Life-Cycle Assessment of biofuels. Science Teacher, 77(9), 35-40.
  49. Kwon, Y., Lee, J., Kim, C., Ahn, J., Seo, E., Nam, Y., Park, E., Choi, S., & Ahn, Y. (2016) The 2015 Revised National Curriculum for "Environment" Subject : Major Changes in Contents and Approaches. Environmental Education, 29(4), 363-383.
  50. Lee, D. Y., Oh, E. S., Kim, H., & Jeong, J. W. (2013). Analysis of carbon cycle concepts based on earth systems perspective of high school students. Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2013.37.1.157
  51. Lee, H., & Kwon, Y. R. (2008). Development and application of Earth science module based on earth system. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 29(2), 175-188. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2008.29.2.175
  52. Lee, H. (2003). Teaching and learning about the earth. Eric Digests.
  53. Lee, H., Kwon, H., Park, K., & Lee, H. (2013). An instrument development and validation for measuring high school students' systems thinking. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(5), 995-1006. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.5.995
  54. Lee, J. E., Han, S., & Park, T. (2017). Conception of carbon cycle in high school students according to the difference of spatial perception ability. Journal of Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 10(3), 308-322. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2017.10.3.308
  55. Lee, S. W., & Lee, Y. J. (2014). Development of the low carbon education program for upper elementary students. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 27(1), 135-157.
  56. Leiserowitz, A., Smith, N., & Marlon, J. R. (2011). American teens & knowledge of climate change. Yale University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, 5.
  57. Lin, S. M. (2016). Reducing students& carbon footprints using personal carbon footprint management system based on environmental behavioural theory and persuasive technology. Environmental Education Research, 22(5), 658-682. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1018142
  58. Lindstrom, T., & Middlecamp, C. (2017). Campus as a Living Laboratory for Sustainability: The Chemistry Connection. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(8), 1036-1042. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00624
  59. Lopez-Ridaura, S., Masera, O., & Astier, M. (2002). Evaluating the sustainability of complex socio-environmental systems. The MESMIS framework. Ecological indicators, 2(1-2), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00043-2
  60. Maeng, S., Seong, Y., & Jang, S. (2013). Present states, methodological features, and an exemplar study of the research on learning progressions. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(1), 161-180. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.161
  61. McNeill, K. L., & Vaughn, M. H. (2012). Urban high school students' critical science agency: Conceptual understandings and environmental actions around climate change. Research in science education, 42(2), 373-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9202-5
  62. Ministry of Education[MOE]. (1997). High school curriculum (No. 1997-15). Seoul, Korea: Author.
  63. Ministry of Education[MOE]. (2015). 2015 revised national curriculum. [ME Notification No. 2015-74]. Sejong: Author.
  64. Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 675-698. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20314
  65. Monroe, M. C., Hall, S., & Li, C. J. (2016). Can climate change enhance biology lessons? A quasi-experiment. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 15(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2016.1164095
  66. Moon, B. C., Jeong, J. W., Kyung, J. B., Koh, Y. K., Youn S. T., Kim, H. G., & Oh, K. H. (2004). Related conceptions to earth system and applying of systems thinking about carbon cycle of the preservice teachers. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 25(8), 684-696.
  67. Musters, C. J. M., De Graaf, H. J., & Ter Keurs, W. J. (1998). Defining socio-environmental systems for sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 26(3), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00104-3
  68. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  69. Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  70. Oh, E. S., & Kim, H. (2014). The analysis of mental models of middle school students on the greenhouse effect. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 30(1), 237-252. https://doi.org/10.14333/KJTE.2014.30.1.237
  71. Oh, Y., & Choi, K. (2014). Analysis of middle school science textbook of 2009-revision for climate change education. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(10), 111-130.
  72. Park, J., Lee, S., & Moon, S. (2014). The Perception of Middle School Teachers about the Environmental Problem. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 58(6), 590-599. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2014.58.6.590
  73. Park, K., Lee, H., Lee, H., & Jeon, J. (2019). Analysis of systems thinking level of pre-service teachers about carbon cycle in earth systems using rubrics of evaluating systems thinking. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(5), 599-611.
  74. Park, T., Jung, W., Choi, S., Choi. D., Lee, D., & Noh, K. (2001). Introduction to environmental education. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
  75. Petrini, M., & Pozzebon, M. (2009). Managing sustainability with the support of business intelligence: Integrating socio-environmental indicators and organisational context. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 18(4), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2009.06.001
  76. Reed, K. A., Stansfield, A., Wehner, M., & Zarzycki, C. M. (2018). The human influence on Hurricane Florence. Retrieved from https://cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/you.stonybrook.edu/dist/4/945/files/2018/09/climate_change_Florence_0911201800Z_final-262u19i.pdf
  77. Ricci, J. C. D., Grau, R. R., Limansky, A. S., &de Mendoza, D. (1988). Environmental Biochemistry: A new approach for teaching the cycles of the elements. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 16(4), 205-208.
  78. Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Newsome, T. M., Barnard, P., & Moomaw, W. R. (2019). World Scientists' Warning of a Climate Emergency. BioScience, 1-5. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz088
  79. Savasci, F. (2014). Carbon Goes to.. Science Activities, 51(2), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368121.2014.889649
  80. Schlenker, R. M., Blanke, R., & Mecca, P. (2007). Using the 5E learning cycle sequence with carbon dioxide. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 44(3), 83-86. https://doi.org/10.3200/SATS.44.3.83-94
  81. Seo, J. W., Kim, H., & Potvin, P. (2014). An analysis of high school students& conceptions of conservation of mass on carbon cycle through carbon emission scenario. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 35(3), 192-202. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2014.35.3.192
  82. Shealy, T., Klotz, L., Godwin, A., Hazari, Z., Potvin, G., Barclay, N., & Cribbs, J. (2019). High school experiences and climate change beliefs of first year college students in the United States. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 925-935. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1293009
  83. Shepardson, D. P., Niyogi, D., Choi, S., & Charusombat, U. (2009). Seventh grade students' conceptions of global warming and climate change. Environmental Education Research, 15(5), 549-570. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903114592
  84. Shin, M., & Kwon, G. (2015). Exploring characteristics of scientific activities presented in weather and climate change related units in elementary, middle and high school science textbooks of the 2009 revised science curriculum. Journal of Energy and Climate Change Education, 5(2), 149-160.
  85. Shin, Y. (2017). Analysis on contents related to appropriate technology, sustainable development, climate change and energy of the 2015 revised national curriculum. Journal of Energy and Climate Change Education, 7(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.22368/ksecce.2017.7.1.15
  86. Sibley, D., Anderson, C., Heidemann, M., Merrill, J., Parker, J., & Szymanski, D. (2007). Box diagrams to assess students' systems thinking about the rock, water and carbon Cycle. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55(2), 138-146. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-55.2.138
  87. Summers, M., Kruger, C., & Childs, A. (2001). Understanding the science of environmental issues: development of a subject knowledge guide for primary teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 23(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690116990
  88. Swant, G. D. (1970). The oxygen cycle. Scientific American, 223(3), 110-123. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0970-110
  89. Taterka, B., & Cory, R. M. (2016). Measuring CO2. Science Teacher, 83(9), 29-35.
  90. Turner II, B. L., Esler, K. J., Bridgewater, P., Tewksbury, J., Sitas, N., Abrahams, B., ... & Mooney, H. (2016). Socio-environmental systems (SES) research: What have we learned and how can we use this information in future research programs. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 19, 160-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.04.001
  91. VOA news. (2019, September 7). Bahamas Hurricane Deaths Increase to 43. Retrieved September 15, 2019, from https://www.voakorea.com/a/5073976.html
  92. Warren, W. A. (2015). The Carbon Cycle: Teaching Youth about Natural Resource Sustainability. Journal of Extension, 53(1), 1-5.
  93. Wrigley, C. (2012). Wood made from water? An introduction to photosynthesis based on a historical error. Teaching Science: The Journal of The Australian Science Teachers Association, 58(3), 53-54.
  94. Yi, J.-E., & Kang, H.-S. (2012). A new model development of backward design: Focusing on improved model. The Journal of Research in Education, 45, 87-114.
  95. Yoon, H., Yoon, W., & Woo, A. J. (2011). High school science teachers' perceptions of the 2009 revised science curriculum and the science textbook. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 15(3), 757-776. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2011.15.3.757
  96. You, H. S., Marshall, J. A., & Delgado, C. (2018). Assessing students& disciplinary and interdisciplinary understanding of global carbon cycling. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(3), 377-398. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21423
  97. Zangori, L., & Koontz, J. A. (2017). Supporting upper-level undergraduate students in building a systems perspective in a botany course. Journal of Biological Education, 51(4), 399-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1257502
  98. Zangori, L., Peel, A., Kinslow, A., Friedrichsen, P., & Sadler, T. D. (2017). Student development of model-based reasoning about carbon cycling and climate change in a socio-scientific issues unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(10), 1249-1273. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21404