DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers' Experience on Design Thinking based Teaching Practicum

예비수학교사들의 디자인 사고(Design Thinking) 기반 교육실습 활동 경험 분석

  • Received : 2020.08.10
  • Accepted : 2020.09.04
  • Published : 2020.09.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the experience of pre-service mathematics teachers who attended at a university course combined with teaching practicum based on design thinking process to identify the change of their awareness of its activities. For the research, 8 pre-service mathematics teachers participated in a mathematics major course, consisting of 5 phases of design thinking formed by Stanford d.school. In the end of the course, qualitative data were collected through individual and focus group interviews and the course activities. By data analysis, the results of this study were as follows. Firstly, the participants' perspectives of design thinking activities were changed from the difficulty and ambiguity of its activity in the beginning of the process to positiveness with competence of solving authentic problem in terms of teaching practicum over time. Secondly, the participating pre-service teachers emphasized that design thinking activities helped them prepare well teaching practicum and raise understanding of students they met in the school fields. Thirdly, some research participants went through the difficulty in utilizing their products drawn from 4th phase (prototyping) of design thinking process depending on the acceptance of their guidance teachers. Fourthly, the research participants also pointed out that the design thinking was a significant activity in that they learned how to understand and communicate with their students and how to collaborate with team members and it gave an insight about the preparation for a class. Through these results, this study identified the possibility of using the design thinking process for pre-service mathematics teachers' teaching practicum. In addition, the research put forward some implications for better use of design thinking in teacher education.

본 연구는 예비수학교사의 교육실습 현장수행 역량을 높이기 위해, 디자인 사고 프로세스를 활용한 대학수업과 학교 현장의 교육실습 연계형 프로그램을 운영하고 참여한 예비수학교사들의 경험을 분석하는 데 목적을 두었다. 이를 위해, 2019학년도 1학기 교육실습 대상자인 예비수학교사 8명이 참여한 대학 전공 수업에 디자인 사고 5단계 프로세스를 적용한 후, 참여자 집단 및 개별 면담 자료와 디자인 사고 활동 결과물 등 질적 자료를 수집 분석하였다. 자료 분석에 따른 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 대학수업에서의 디자인 사고 1~4단계를 통해 참여자들의 인식은, 초기에 공감 단계의 혼돈과 막연함에서 시작하였으나 시간의 흐름에 따라 프로그램 활동에 대해 보다 적극적인 변화를 보였다. 둘째, 교육실습 중, 디자인 사고의 5번째 단계인 평가단계에서는, 참여 예비수학교사들이 이전단계에서 생성한 프로토타입의 적용성을 확인하는 활동을 적극적으로 수행하였다. 다만, 일부 현장의 허용적이지 않은 상황으로 인해 프로토타입의 적용에 어려움을 가진 사례도 있었다. 셋째, 교육실습 후, 대학수업에서의 평가 및 성찰 과정에서 참여자들은 디자인 사고 활동의 필요성에 긍정적으로 공감하였다. 끝으로, 대학수업과 학교현장의 교육실습 간 융통성 있는 연결을 위해 두 영역의 긴밀한 연계가 전제될 필요가 있음이 확인되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, H., Ko, E., Kim, T., Cho, W., Lee, K., & Lee, D. (2011). Mathematics teachers' perspectives on competencies for good teaching and perspective teacher education, Journal of Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics: School Mathematics, 13(4), 633-649.
  2. Kwon, N. (2001). Theoretical review of teaching practicum, Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 17(1), 65-81.
  3. Kim, W., & Kim, G. (2019). Study on creative visualization process based on visual thinking and design thinking: Focused on the analysis of visual elements in Korea and Finland mathematics textbooks, Journal of Basic Design & Art, 20(6), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.47294/KSBDA.20.6.10
  4. Nam, Y., & Jeon, P. (2006). A case study on elementary pre-service teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics that learned in the course of student teaching, The Mathematical Education, 45(1), 75-96.
  5. Nam, C., Choi, J., & Kim, J. (2019). The effects of flipped learning strategies on pre-service teachers' collective self-esteem and attitude toward cooperative learning in design thinking learning environments, The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 36(4), 101-124. https://doi.org/10.24211/TJKTE.2019.36.4.101
  6. Park, K. (2019). A study on the development of pre-service teachers' design thinking, The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 107-130. https://doi.org/10.15708/KSCS.37.2.5
  7. Park, M., & Kim, G. (2018). STEAM educational research for developing personality (cultivation of human nature) using design thinking, Journal of Cultural Product & Design, 55, 197-205. https://doi.org/10.18555/kicpd.2018.55.18
  8. Pang, J., & Sunwoo, J. (2016). The change of prospective teachers' comments on elementary mathematics instruction by teaching practicum and discussion about lessons, Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 20(2), 259-281.
  9. Byun, H. (2015). The influence of design thinking process to develop undergraduates' creativity, The Journal of Creativity Education, 15(3), 149-167.
  10. Seong, G. (2018). A study on a project with design thinking process to facilitate pre-service teachers' problem-solving competences, Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(6), 781-806. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.6.781
  11. Shim, S., & Lee, K. (2013). Perceptions of pre-service mathematics teachers' teaching practicum and difficulties of mathematics instruction, The Mathematical Education, 52(4), 517-529. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2013.52.4.517
  12. Eom, M., & Uhm, J. (2010). A survey on perception and needs for pre-service teachers before and after teaching practicum, Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 17(1), 127-149.
  13. Lee, Y., Oh, Y., & Kim,, W. (2017). Feasibility study of design thinking for systematization of educational building of STEAM: Focused on analysis of a case study of the STEAM teachers' association in 2016, Journal of Korean Society of Design Culture, 23(2), 481-495.
  14. Lee, W. (2016). Study on the process of student teaching in secondary schools: Application of mixed methods, Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 28(2), 225-255.
  15. Lee, J. (2018). Development and implementation of the experience of the design thinking process based on human needs, Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(6), 99-128. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.6.99
  16. Lee, J. (2019). Analysis of pre-service teachers' experience on implementation of a problem-solving project using design thinking process, Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(24), 981-1005. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.24.981
  17. Ju, M., & Yang, S. (2007). Case analysis of school-university in collaboration for student teaching: Exploring possibility of extended student teaching for secondary teacher preparation program, The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 24(2), 363-384. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2007.24.2.363
  18. Brown, T. (2008). Design Thinking, Harvard Business Review (June 2008), 84-92.
  19. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking, Design Issues, 8(2), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
  20. Gray, C. M. (2013). Factors that shape design thinking, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 18(3), 8-20.
  21. Henriksen, D., Gretter, S., & Richardson, C. (2018). Design thinking and the practicing teacher: Addressing problems of practice in teacher education, Teaching Education, 31(2) https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1531841
  22. Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 140-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001
  23. IDEO. (2012). Design thinking for educators (2nd ed.). Retrieved from https://designthinkingforeducators.com/toolkit/
  24. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H. (2015). Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. Singapore: Springer.
  25. Ponte, J., & Brunheira, L. (2001). Analysing practice in preservice mathematics teacher education, Mathematics Education Research Journal, 3, 16-27.
  26. Rhoads, K., Radu, I., & Weber, K. (2011). The teacher internship experiences of prospective high school mathematics teachers, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(4), 975-998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9266-8
  27. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching, Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

Cited by

  1. 교수 지식과 실천적 역량을 위한 그룹 활동에서 예비교사들의 동기: 과제 가치 사례 vol.60, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2021.60.3.341