The Journal of Korean society of community based occupational therapy (대한지역사회작업치료학회지)

Korean Society of Community Based Occupational Therapy Association (대한지역사회작업치료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Education on Motor Skill Assessment Tool for Occupational Therapists

작업치료사를 위한 운동성 평가도구의 교육효과

  • Choi, Jeong-sil (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Chungbuk Health and Science University) ;
  • Kim, Min-Joo (Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Kyung Hee University)
  • 최정실 (충북보건대학교 작업치료과) ;
  • 김민주 (경희대학교 기계공학과 신경역학연구소)
  • Received : 2020.07.20
  • Accepted : 2020.08.11
  • Published : 2020.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective : The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of intensive one-day training on Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 screening developmental coordination disorder. Methods : We provided intensive one-day training which combined lecture and practice on MABC-2 assessment tools for 33 trainees. Interrater reliability was calculated by using Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with the raw score of results scored simultaneously by experts and trainees of MABC-2. Results : The 33 female trainees with an average of five years and three months of experience and less experience using motor skill assessment tools scored raw score while watching the performance scenes of normal children. The results of the ICC between experts and training participants in MABC-2 obtained a high confidence 0.95 and above (p<.001). Conclusion : Clinicians who participated in one-day training seems to use MABC-2 effectively. Through this, one-day training seems to be effective in acquiring new motor skill assessment tools.

목적 : 본 연구는 운동발달을 평가하고, 발달성협응장애를 판별할 수 있는 운동성 평가도구인 Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2(MABC-2)을 활용하기 위해 6시간의 교육과정을 통하여 작업치료사의 평가역량이 향상될 수 있는지를 규명하고자 하였다. 연구방법 : 본 연구에 MABC-2를 임상에서 사용하길 희망하는 작업치료사 33인이 참여하였다. MABC-2 전문가 2인이 교육 참여자들에게 6시간의 교육을 실시하였다. 이론 강의(2시간)는 MABC-2 소개와 운동평가도구의 연구동향, 실습강의(4시간)는 MABC-2 평가항목 소개, 녹화된 평가 장면 관찰, 도구를 사용하여 직접 평가실습을 경험한 후 준비된 사례영상을 보고 채점과 결과분석을 실시하였다. 교육의 효과를 검증하기 위해 모든 교육과정을 마친 후 MABC-2의 전문가 1인과 교육에 참여한 작업치료사 33명이 동시에 평가동영상 샘플을 보면서 평가지에 원점수를 기록하였다. 이중 운동성 평가도구의 경험이 없는 23인의 자료를 활용해 평가자간 신뢰도를 산출하여 교육의 효과성을 검증하였다. 결과 : 본 연구에 참여한 작업치료사는 평균 5년 3개월의 경력을 지닌 30세 이상의 여성으로 약 70%의 교육생은 MABC-2 외에 국내에서 사용 중인 운동성 평가도구를 임상에 적용해 본 경험이 없었다. MABC-2 전문가가 제공한 교육을 받은 작업치료사들과 전문가 간의 ICC 결과는 .95이상으로 높은 평가자간 신뢰도가 확보되었다(p<.001). 결론 : 이론과 실습으로 구성된 6시간의 교육과정에 참여한 작업치료사의 평가자간 신뢰도가 .95이상으로 나타났으며, 운동기술 평가도구를 적절하게 활용할 수 있는 평가역량이 향상되었다. 이를 통하여 MABC-2에 관한 특정한 교육을 제공할 경우 작업치료사가 새로운 평가도구를 적절하게 활용할 수 있으며, 이를 통해 평가와 관련한 직무능력을 향상시킬 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-5th edition. Washington DC: APA Press.
  2. Chow, S. M., & Henderson, S. E. (2003). Interrater and test-retest reliability of the movement assessment battery for Chinese preschool children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(5), 574-577. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.57.5.574
  3. Deitz, J. C., Kartin, D., & Kopp, K. (2007). Review of the Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency (BOT-2). Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 27(4), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/J006v27n04_06
  4. Ellinoudis, T., Evaggelinou, C., Kourtessis, T., Konstantinidou, Z., Venetsanou, F., & Kambas, A. (2011). Reliability and validity of age band 1 of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(3), 1046-1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.035
  5. Han, D., & Kim, M. (2014). Review of motor development assessment tools and application. Journal of the Korean Association of Certified Exercise Professionals, 16(3), 1-14.
  6. Henderson, S. E., Sugden, D. A., & Barnett, A. L. (2007). Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2. London: Harcourt Assessment.
  7. Holm, I., Tveter, A. T., Aulie, V. S., & Stuge, B. (2013). High intra-and inter-rater chance variation of the movement assessment battery for children 2, ageband 2. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(2), 795-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.11.002
  8. Kang, S. (2011). How to Estimate Inter-rater Reliability. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 13(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.21797/KSME.2011.13.1.001
  9. Kim, I., S. (2015) A survey on a status of sensory integration therapy in Korea. The Journal Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 13(2), 1-19.
  10. Kim, M. J. (2016). A basic study of prevalence and characteristics of motor coordination among children with developmental coordination disorder in Korea. The Korean Journal of the Elementary Physical Education, 21(4), 1-9.
  11. Kim, S. (2013). Understanding of motor development (2nd ed). Seoul: Seoul National University Publishing Culture Center.
  12. Kim, S., Kim, M. J., Valentini, N. C., & Clark, J. E. (2014). Validity and reliability of the TGMD-2 for south Korean children. Journal of Motor Behavior, 46(5), 351-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2014.914886
  13. Lee, K., & Kim, M. J. (2018). Case study: Changes of motor skill development in children with developmental coordination disorder after 12-week after-school program. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology, 29(3), 209-217. https://doi.org/10.14385/KSSP.29.3.209
  14. Lee, K., & Kim, M. J. (2019). A systematic review of intervention research for Korean children with developmental coordiantion disorder. The Korean Journal of Elementary Physical Education, 25(3), 119-131 https://doi.org/10.26844/ksepe.2019.25.3.119
  15. Lee, S. H., Hong, C. R., & Park, H. Y. (2018). Current trend in use of occupational therapy assessment tool by pediatric occupational therapist. The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 16(3), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.18064/JKASI.2018.16.3.023
  16. Missiuna, C., Pollock, N., Egan, M., DeLaat, D., Gaines, R., & Soucie, H. (2008). Enabling occupation through facilitating the diagnosis of developmental coordination disorder. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(1), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.2182/cjot.07.012
  17. Nam, S., Lee, K., Kim, S., Lee, Y., Park, J., Kwon, Y., & Kim, M. (2017). A preliminary study of reaction time in Korean children with developmental coordination. The Korean Journal of the Elementary Physical Education, 22(4), 47-58.
  18. Park, S. Y., & Yoo, E. Y. (2002). The use of occupational therapy assessment tool by Korean occupational therapist. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 10(2), 99-108.
  19. Smits-Engelsman, B. C., Fiers, M. J., Henderson, S. E., & Henderson, L. (2008). Interrater reliability of the movement assessment battery for children. Physical Therapy, 88(2), 286-294. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20070068
  20. Song, M. (2008). A Review of studies for occupational therapy assessment tools. Journal of Korean Society of Health Sciences, 5(1), 89-103.
  21. Stephen, J. W. (2009). Quality of life outcomes in clinical trials and health-care evaluation: A practical guide to analysis and interpretation. London, England: Antony Rowe.
  22. Suomi, R., & Suomi, J. (1997). Effectiveness of a training program with physical education students and experienced physical education teachers in scoring the Test of Gross Motor Development. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 771-778. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1997.84.3.771
  23. Ulrich, D. A. (2000). Test of gross motor development 2nd ed. (TGMD-2). Austin, TX: Pro-ed Publishers.
  24. Wagner, M. O., Kastner, J., Petermann, F., & Bos, K. (2011). Factorial validity of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (age band 2). Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 674-680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.016