Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Quality Factors Influencing University Library Re-visitation and Recommendation Intention Analyzed using Structural Equation Model

구조방정식 모형을 적용한 대학도서관 재이용과 추천의향에 영향을 미치는 품질요소에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2020.10.14
  • Accepted : 2020.11.14
  • Published : 2020.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the factors influencing the intention of revisiting and recommending by applying a structural equation model, targeting the service quality factors of university libraries derived from previous studies. For 11 days from April 30th, 2020 to May 10th, 2020, a total of 127 user groups (undergraduate students, graduate students, professors/instructors) were surveyed on their intention to revisit and recommend. The analysis results are as follows. 'Materials' and 'service customization' were shown as quality dimensions that influence revisit. In addition, revisiting was found to have an effect on recommendation intention, and it was analyzed that 'materials' and 'service customization' affect not only revisit but also recommendation intention. In addition, 'service customization' was found to be a factor that directly affects the intention to recommend. Based on this, a method of applying the concept of customization to library services and marketing was proposed in an environment where users' needs are diversifying and becoming personalized.

본 연구의 목적은 선행연구에서 도출된 대학도서관 서비스 품질요소를 대상으로 재이용과 추천의향에 영향을 미치는 요인이 무엇인지 구조방정식 모형을 적용하여 분석하고자 하는 것이다. 2020.4.30.부터 2020.5.10.까지 11일간 이용자 그룹(학부생, 대학원생, 교수/강사) 총 127명을 대상으로 재이용과 추천의향에 대한 설문 조사를 실시하였다. 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. '자료'와 '서비스 고객화'는 재이용에 영향을 미치는 품질 차원으로 나타났으며, 재이용은 추천의향에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타나 '자료'와 '서비스 고객화'가 재이용 뿐만 아니라 추천의향에도 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 또한 '서비스 고객화'는 추천의향에 직접적으로 영향을 미치는 요인으로 나타났다. 이를 바탕으로 이용자의 요구가 다변화하고 개인화되고 있는 도서관 환경에서 도서관 서비스와 마케팅에 고객화 개념을 적용하는 방안을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Education. 2019. The 2nd University Library Promotion Comprehensive Plan (2019-2023). Seoul: Ministry of Education.
  2. Kim, Nan Do et al. 2020. The trend. Seoul: Miraebook.
  3. Kim, Mi Ryung. 2015. Analyzing user's perceptions on quality elements and attributes of university library services and their relation importance. Ph.D. diss. School of Library and Information Science, SungKyunKwan University, South Korea.
  4. Yu, Jong Pil. 2012. (Professor Yu's) Structural equation model concept and understanding. Seoul: Hannarea.
  5. Cronin, J. Joseph Jr. and Steven, A. Taylor. 1992. "Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension." Journal of Marketing, 56(3): 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299205600106
  6. Davis, S. M. 1987. Future Perfect., MA: Addision-Wesely.
  7. Garvin, David A. 1984. "What Does "Product Quality" Really Mean?." Sloan Management Review, 26(1): 25-43.
  8. Gilmore, James H. and Pine II, B. Joseph. 1997. "The four faces of mass customization." Harvard Business Review, 75(1): 91-101.
  9. Gronroos, Christian. 1982. Strategic Management and Marketing in Service Sector. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.
  10. Gronroos, Christian. 1984. "A service Quality Model and its Marketing Implication." European Journal of Marketing, 18(4): 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004784
  11. Lewis, R. C., H. Booms. 1983. The Marketing Aspect of Service Quality. In Berry, L., Shostack, G., and Upah, G., (Eds). Emerging Perspectives on Service Marketing. Chicago, IL: American Marketing, 99-107.
  12. Murdick, T. G., Render, B. and Russell, R. S. 1990. Services Operation Management. Needham Height, MA: Alyn and Bacon.
  13. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. 1985. "A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research." Journal of Marketing, 49: 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298504900403
  14. Parasuraman, A. et al. 1988. "SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality." Journal of Retailing, 64(1): 12-40.
  15. Pine, Joseph B.II., Peppers Don. and Rogers Mathartha. 1995. "Do you want to keep your customers forever?" Harvard business review, March-April: 103-114.
  16. Saxe, Robert and Weitz, Barton A. 1982. "The SOCO scale: A measure of the customer orientation of salespeople." Journal of marketing research, 19(3): 343-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378201900307
  17. Strauss, Anselm., Corbin, Juliet. 1990. Basics of Qualatative Research: Grounded Theory procedures and techniques. CA: Sage. 신경림 역. 2001. 근거이론의 단계. 서울: 현문사