Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Improvement of Small Library Evaluation System and Indicators

작은도서관 평가체계 및 지표 개선방안 연구

  • 김보일 (한남대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 김홍렬 (전주대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2021.11.11
  • Accepted : 2021.12.15
  • Published : 2021.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study proposed the improvement in the evaluation systems and indicators of small libraries, by analyzing the evaluation indicators of the current small libraries, domestic and foreign ones and domestic other institutions, and gathering opinions from managers of them and experts belonging to related groups, in order to enhance the management quality of small libraries and strengthen the independence of them, based on the evaluation on the activation and substantiality of them. The evaluation systems proposed by this study is divided into Track 1 evaluating small libraries and Track 2 evaluating local governments. The evaluation indicators of small libraries was simplified by eliminating the indicators found from the statistics of Track 1 (small libraries). Track 1 consists of three evaluation areas in regard to the management of small libraries, such as library management, infrastructures and services, 8 evaluation items, 10 evaluation indicators, quantitative (a total of 100 points) and qualitative (a total of 120 points) evaluation. Track 2 consists of 2 evaluation areas in regard to the establishment and enforcement of small library policies and the support for small libraries, such as library management and infrastructures, 4 evaluation items, 5 evaluation indicators and quantitative evaluation (a total of 100 points).

이 연구에서는 작은도서관의 활성화 및 내실화 측면에서의 평가를 통해 작은도서관 운영의 질적 수준을 향상하고 자생력을 강화하기 위하여 현행 작은도서관 평가지표 분석, 국내외 작은도서관 관련 평가지표 분석, 국내 타 관종 평가지표 분석, 작은도서관 운영자 및 관련 단체 전문가 등을 대상으로 의견수렴 등을 통해 작은도서관 평가체계 및 지표를 개선하여 제안하였다. 이 연구에서 제안된 작은도서관의 평가체계는 단위 작은도서관을 대상으로 하는 트랙 1과 기초지방자치단체 평가하는 트랙 2로 구분된다. 작은도서관의 평가지표는 트랙 1 작은도서관에 대하여 통계를 통해 확인되는 지표는 생략하고 단순화하였으며, 작은도서관 운영에 따른 도서관 경영, 도서관 인프라, 도서관 서비스의 3개 평가영역, 8개 평가항목, 10개 평가지표 100점으로 구성된 정량평가와 20점 총 120점으로 된 정성평가로 구성하였다. 트랙 2 기초지방자치단체의 평가지표는 정성평가 없이 작은도서관 정책 수립 및 시행과 작은도서관 지원 등에 관하여 도서관 경영, 도서관 인프라의 2개 평가영역, 4개 평가항목, 5개 평가지표 100점으로 구성된 정량평가로 구성되어 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, In-Ja, Yoon, So-Young, & Cha, Sung-Jong (2011). A study to improve the statistical indicators of small libraries. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(4), 375-393. http://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.4.201112.375
  2. Cho, Hyun-Yang & Kim, Hong-Ryul (2012). A study on the improvement in statistical indicator of public library. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(4), 427-450. http://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.4.201212.427
  3. Cho, Mi-Ah, Byeon, Hyeon-Ju, & Kim, Bo-Il (2013). A case study on measures to revitalize small libraries of the type through operational diagnositc. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 47(2), 293-314. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.2.293
  4. Chun, Ji-Hye (2019). A Study on The Improvement of The Evaluation Indicators for Small Library Operation Indicators for Small Library Operation. M.D. thesis, Graduate School of Public Policy, Hanyang University.
  5. Hong, Hyun-Jin & Lee, Yong-Nam (1999). A theoretical study of the public library performance measurement. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science, 33(2), 45-67.
  6. Kim, Bo-Il (2018). A study on the improvement of evaluation indicators for small library operations. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science, 52(1), 5-34. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2018.52.1.005
  7. Kim, Bo-Il, Kim, Hong-Ryul, & Lee, Bo-Ra (2020). A study on the policy for the activation of small library. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 37(3), 157-175. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.3.157
  8. Kim, Gyu-hwan & Nam, Young-Joon (2008). A study on development of performance indicators for korean public libraries. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science, 42(4), 113-139. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.4.113
  9. Kim, Hong-Ryul (2013). A study on the improvement in statistical indicator of public library. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(2), 77-95. http://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.4.201212.427
  10. Koontz, C. & Gubbin, B. ed. (2011). IFLA Public Library Service Guideline (Amendment Edition). Translated by Chang, Hye-Rhan. Seoul: Korean Library Association.
  11. Lee, Yong-Nam & Hong, Hyun-Jin (1999). A study of the evaluation indicators in korean public libraries. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science, 33(4), 113-131.
  12. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (2019). Report on The Results of a Small Library Policy Study, Sejong: Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. Available: https://www.mcst.go.kr/kor/s_policy/dept/deptView.jsp?pDataCD=0406000000&pSeq=1772
  13. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (2020). A Study on The Improvement of The National Library Operation Evaluation Index and System. Sejong: Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. Available: https://www.korea.kr/archive/expDocView.do?docId=34137
  14. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (2021). Report on Operation Status and Evaluation of Operation of Small Libraries in 2020. Sejong: Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. Available: https://www.smalllibrary.org/chart/view/142?currentPage=1
  15. Noh, Young-Hee (2017). Research on development of social value evaluation indicators for public libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(2), 181-214. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.2.181
  16. Oh, Dong-Geun, Kim, Jong-Sung, Choi, Sung-Yeol, Park, Sang-Hoo, & Yeo, Ji-Suk (2007). Developing and applying the evaluation measures for public library service to children. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science, 41(4), 365-385. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2007.41.4.365
  17. Yoon, Myung-Hee & Kim, Gi-Yeong (2009). A study on the perception of librarians on the usefulness of measures in public library operation assessment: in the 2008 korean library operation assessment. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science, 43(3), 221-245. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2009.43.3.221
  18. Department for Culture, Media and Sport. Comprehensive, Efficient and Modern Public Libraries - Standards and Assessment. Available: https://www.plymouth.gov.uk/sites/default/files/NationalLibraryStandards.pdf
  19. Swan, D. W., Grimes, J., & Owens, T. (2013). The state of small and rural library in the united states. Research Brief, 5, 1-13. Available: http://www.imls.gov/assets/1/AssetManager/Brief2013_05.pdf
  20. Zweizig, D. & Rodger, E. J. (1982). Output Measures for Public Libraries: A Manual of Standardized Procedures. Chicago: American Library Association.
  21. 文部科學省 (2013). "図書館の設置及び運營上の望ましい基準". Available: http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shougai/tosho/001/_icsFiles/afieldfile/2013/01/31/1330295.pdf
  22. 生涯學習審議會社會教育分科審議會計画部會図書館専門委員會. "公立図書館の設置及び運營 上の望ましい基準." Available: http://www.jla.or.jp/library/gudeline/tabid/235/Default.aspx#3-3-9
  23. 日本図書館協會図書館調査事業委員會編 (2016). "日本の図書館." 東京: 本図書館協會.