Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Convergence effectiveness verification for developing practice guidelines for dementia patients cognitive programs

치매환자 인지프로그램 실무지침 개발을 위한 융합적 효과검증

  • Ham, Min-Joo (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Kangwon National University)
  • 함민주 (강원대학교 작업치료학과)
  • Received : 2021.02.15
  • Accepted : 2021.05.20
  • Published : 2021.05.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is a methodological study that explains the procedure for verifying effectiveness in developing practical guidelines for cognitive programs suitable for dementia patients. Based on the development of evidence-based new clinical practice guidelines, a preliminary recommendation for the domestic dementia patient care guidelines was developed. The practical guidelines consisted of the final four types, and the content validity score of the configuration items was 0.87 to 1 point. In the sub-categories of field applicability, appropriateness score was 3.95 to 4.34 points, applicability score was 3.57 to 4.27 points, and predicted effect score was 3.84 to 4.22 points. Through the examination of the content validity and field applicability of experts, it was confirmed that the practical guidelines developed in this study can be used as the basis for establishing an intervention plan for dementia cognitive program managers engaged in clinical practice. In future studies should further facilitate the development of evidence-based treatment guidelines to select appropriate treatment activities for dementia patients.

본 연구는 치매환자에게 적합한 인지 프로그램 실무지침을 개발하는 과정에서의 효과성을 검증하는 절차를 기술한 방법론적 연구이다. 근거중심의 임상진료지침 신규개발 방법에 기초하여 국내 치매환자용 인지프로그램 실무지침 예비 권고안을 개발하였다. 이후, 효과검증을 위해 전문가 내용타당도 및 실무자 현장 적용성 검증을 수행하였다. 실무지침은 최종 4개 유형으로 구성하였으며 구성항목의 내용타당도는 0.87-1점을 나타냈다. 현장 적용성의 하위항목에서는 적절성이 3.95-4.34점, 적용가능성이 3.57-4.27점, 효과성예측이 3.84-4.22점이었다. 전문가 내용타당도 및 현장 적용성 예측 조사를 통해 본 연구에서 개발한 실무지침이 임상에 종사하는 치매 인지프로그램 관리자의 중재 계획수립과 임상 근거로 활용할 수 있음을 확인하였다. 추후 연구에서는 치매환자에게 최적의 치료적 활동을 제시하기 위한 근거중심의 실무지침 개발연구가 더욱 활성화되어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. World health organization. (2019). Risk reduction of cognitive decline and dementia: WHO guidelines, Retrieved from https://www.who.int/mental_health/neurology/dementia/guidelines_risk_reduction/en/
  2. National Institute of Dementia. (2019). Korean dementia observatory 2018. Seongnam, Korea: National Institute of Dementia.
  3. G. D'Onofrio, D. Sancarlo, D. Seripa, F. Riciardi, F. Giuliani, F. Panza & A. Greco. (2016). Non-Pharmacological Aproaches in the Treatment of Dementia. En D. Vito(ed.), Update on Dementia. DOI : 10.572/64232
  4. R. Y. Na, J. H. Yang, Y. S. Yeom, Y. J. Kim, S. J. Byun, K. W. Kim & K. W. Kim. (2019). A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis of Nonpharmacological Interventions for Moderate to Severe Dementia. Psychiatry Investigation, 16(5), 325-35. DOI : 10.3073/pi.2019.02.1.2
  5. H. R. Ji, S. H. Choi, M. S. Cho & R. A. Ju. (2004). The effects of the continuous dementia nursing intervention program on cognitive function and depression of the elderly with mild dementia in the community. Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing, 6(2), 216-227.
  6. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2018). Dementia: assessment, management and support for people living with dementia and their carers. Retrieved from https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng97/resources/dementia-assessment-management-and-support-for-people-living-with-dementia-and-their-carers-pdf-1837760199109
  7. L. Clare & R. T. Woods. (2004). Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation for people with early-stage Alzheimer's disease: a review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 14, 385-401. DOI : 10.1080/09602010443000074
  8. F. Segal-Gidan, D. Cherry, R. Jones, B. Williams, L. Hewett & J. Chodosh. (2011). Alzheimer's Disease Management Guideline: Update 2008. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 7(3), e51-e59. DOI : 10.1016 /j.jalz.2010.07.005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2010.07.005
  9. V. C. Vilela, R. L. Pacheco, C. O. C. Latorraca, D. V. Pachito & R. Riera. (2017). What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia?. Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 135(3), 309-320. DOI : 10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0092060617
  10. American Occupational Therapy Association. (2017). Fact sheet (Dementia and the role of occupational therapy). Retrieved from https://www.aota.org
  11. L. F. Viola, P. V. Nunes, M. S. Yassuda, I. Aprahamian, F. S. Santos, G. D. Santos & O. V. Forlenza. (2011). Effects of a multidisciplinar cognitive rehabilitation program for patients with mild Alzheimer's disease. Clinics, 66(8), 1395-1400. DOI : 10.1590/S1807-59322011000800015
  12. S. H. Cho & Y. A. Yang. (2017). The Effect of Occupational Therapy Based Multimodal Cognitive Rehabilitation Therapy on Cognitive Function in Elderly People With Mild Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 25(3), 71-86. DOI : 10.14519/jksot.2017.25.3.06
  13. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. (2017). Quality Care Strategy for Long-term Care Hospitals and Nursing Homes. Sejong, Korea: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
  14. National Health Insurance Service. (2017). Cognitive activity type program e-book(cognitive training tool). Retrieved from http://longtermcare.or.kr/npbs/index.jsp
  15. J. E. Yoo. (2019). Recent Changes and Challenges in National Dementia Policy in Korea. Health and welfare policy forum, 276, 6-18.
  16. M. S. Park. (2008). Evidence-Based Medicine. Neonatal medicine, 15(1), 1-5.
  17. S. M. Lim, E. S. Shin, S. H. Lee, K. H. Seo, Y. M. Jung & J. E. Jang. (2011). Tools for assessing quality and risk of bias by levels of evidence. Journal of the Korean Medical Association, 54(4), 419-429. DOI : 10.5124/jkma.2011.54.4.419
  18. D. Atkins, D. Best, P. A. Briss, M. Eccles, Y. Falck-Ytter, S. Flottorp & GRADE Working Group. (2004). Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. British Medical Journal, 328(7454), 1490. DOI : 10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490
  19. W. J. Shin. (2015). An Introduction of the Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hanyang Medical Reviews, 35(1), 9-17. DOI : 10.7599/hmr.2015.35.1.9
  20. H. S. Roh. (2017). The development of guideline on home visiting physical therapy for the elderly. (Master's thesis). Eulji University Graduate school of Public Health, Daejeon.
  21. M. R. Lynn. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382-385. DOI : 10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
  22. D. Polit & C. Beck. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497. DOI : 10.1002/nur. 20147
  23. D. F. Polit, C. T. Beck & S. V. Owen. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459-467. DOI : 10.1002/nur.20199
  24. J. R. Cates, D. N. Young, D. J. Guerriero, W. T. Jahn, J. P. Armine, A. B. Korbett & R. A. King. (2001). Evaluating the quality of clinical practice guidelines. Journal of Manipulative Physiological Therapeutics, 24(3), 170-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-4754(01)19243-2
  25. J. Ngo & J. M. Holroyd-Leduc. (2015). Systematic review of recent dementia practice guidelines. Age and Ageing, 44(1), 25-33. DOI : 10.1093/ageing/afu143
  26. J. H. Keffer. (2001). Guidelines and algorithms: Perceptions of why and when they are successful and how to improve them. Clinical Chemistry. 47(8), 1563-1572. DOI : 10.1093/clinchem/47.8.1563
  27. National Institute for Health Research. (2015). Changing practice in dementia care in the community: developing and testing evidence-based interventions, from timely diagnosis to end of Life(EVIDEM). Retrieved from https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/pgfar/pgfar03030#/abstract
  28. British Columbia. (2012). Best practice guideline for accommodating and managing behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia in residential care. Retrieved from https://www.health.gov.bc.ca/library/publications/year/2012/bpsd-guideline.pdf
  29. B. D. Ku, S. G. Kim, J. Y. Lee, K. H. Park, J. H. Shin, K. K. Kim & S. H. Han. (2011). Clinical practice guideline for dementia by Clinical Research Center for Dementia of South Korea. Journal of the Korean Medical Association, 54(8), 861-875. DOI : 10.5124/jkma.2011.54.8.861
  30. R. Graham, M. Mancher, D. M. Wolman, S. Greenfield, E. Steinberg & editors. (2011). Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington(DC), USA: National Academies Press.
  31. J. H. Seo, J. H. Choi, N. G. Lee, S. O. Oh, U. H. Yoo & J. H. Ku. (2017). A Study for Community-Based Age-Friendly Integrated Healthcare Model. Sejong, Korea: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.