DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Productivity and Efficiency Comparative Analysis of Container Terminal in Busan New Port

부산신항 컨테이너터미널 효율성 및 생산성 비교 분석

  • Kang, Seok-Han (Operation Team, Pusan New International Terminal) ;
  • Nam, Jung-Woo (KMI-KMOU Cooperation Course, Korea Maritime and Ocean University) ;
  • Sim, Min-Seop (KMI-KMOU Cooperation Course, Korea Maritime and Ocean University) ;
  • Kim, Yul-Seong (Logistics System Engineering, Korea Maritime and Ocean University)
  • 강석한 (부산신항국제터미널(주) 운영팀) ;
  • 남정우 (한국해양대학교 KMI-KMOU 학연협동과정) ;
  • 심민섭 (한국해양대학교 KMI-KMOU 학연협동과정) ;
  • 김율성 (한국해양대학교 물류시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2021.05.27
  • Accepted : 2021.06.23
  • Published : 2021.06.30

Abstract

The need for analysis of the operational efficiency and productivity of the Busan Port Container Terminal is increasing because of the Hanjin Shipping's bankruptcy and the re-establishment of the Maritime Alliance. This paper analyzes the efficiency and productivity of five Busan New Port Container Terminal companies by using the DEA analysis and Malmquist productivity index model based on the port construction disclosure data and the collected terminal internal data. According to the analysis, the average efficiency of the five container terminals increased in 2018 but declined slightly in 2019, and the Malmquist index showed that all terminals except A have advanced productivity. Additionally, relative to facility productivity, operators at the North Container Terminal had higher facility productivity than operators at the Busan New Port Nam Container Terminal, and regarding capital productivity, the D terminal ported by HMM, a national shipping company, was the highest in facility productivity. Regarding labor productivity, the C terminal showed the highest productivity, and regarding ship work productivity, the A terminal showed the highest productivity.

한진해운 파산 및 해운동맹의 재정립 등으로 부산항 컨테이너터미널의 운영 효율성 및 생산성 분석의 필요성이 증가하고 있다. 본 논문은 항만공사 공시자료 및 수집된 터미널 내부자료를 바탕으로 DEA 분석 및 Malmquist 생산성 지수 모형을 활용하여 부산신항 컨테이너 터미널 5개사의 효율성 및 생산성을 분석하였다. 분석결과 컨테이너터미널 5개사의 평균 효율성은 2018년 증가하였으나 2019년 소폭 하락한 것으로 나타났으며, Malmquist 지수를 통해 종합적인 생산성 변화를 살펴보면 A사를 제외한 모든 터미널이 생산성이 진보한 것으로 나타났다. 또한 설비 생산성의 경우 부산신항 남컨테이너터미널보다 북컨테이너터미널에 위치한 운영사들이 높은 것으로 나타났고, 자본 생산성의 경우 국적 선사인 HMM이 기항하는 D사가 가장 높은 것으로 나타났다. 노동 생산성의 경우 C사가 가장 높은 생산성을 보였으며, 선박작업 생산성의 경우 A사가 가장 높은 생산성을 보였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 해양수산부 제4차 해운항만물류 전문인력양성사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임.

References

  1. Ahmed, S. A., Ahmad, T. K. and Adi, M.(2009), "DEA Malmquist index measurement in Middle East and East African containers terminals", Shipping and Transport Logistics, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2009.027533
  2. Antonio, E., Beatriz, T. and Lourdes, T.(2004), "Sources of efficiency gains in port reform: a DEA decomposition of a Malmquist TFP index for Mexico", Utilities Policy, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 221-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2004.04.013
  3. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E.(1978), "Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  4. Cha, M. S.(2006), "A Study on Terminal Productivity Improvement in Busan Port", Dong-A University, Graduate school of Industry, Master Dissertation.
  5. Fitzsimmons, J. A. and Fitzsimmons, M. J.(1994), Service Management for Competitive Advantage, Mcgraw-Hill, pp. 1-462.
  6. Kang, J. S.(2008), "Determining Performance Factors of Container Terminals with a Combined Model of Balanced Score card (BSC) and Quality Function Deployment (QFD)", Korea Maritime University, Graduate school of Logistics Systems, PhD Dissertation.
  7. Kang, H. G., Ryoo, D. K. and Sohn, B. R.(2012), "A Management Efficiency Analysis of Container Terminal Operators", Journal of navigation and port research, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 527-534. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2012.36.6.527
  8. Kevin, P. B. Cullinane. and Teng, F. W.(2006), "The efficiency of European container ports: A cross-sectional data envelopment analysis", International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560500322417
  9. Kim, C. W., Kim, J. M. and Ha, M. S.(2005), "Determinants of Container Terminal Choice by Liners: The Busan Port Terminals Case", Korean Academy of International Commerce, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 139-155.
  10. Li, D., Kwak, K. S., Nam, K. C. and An, Y. M.(2015), "A Comparative Analysis of Terminal Efficiency in Northeast Asia Container Ports", Journal of navigation and port research, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 55-60. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2015.39.1.55
  11. Park, B. I.(2002), "The Simulation-based Strategy of Measuring Productivities in the Container Terminal", Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 43-60.
  12. Ryoo, D. K.(2005), "A Comparative Analysis of Container Terminal Operation in Busan and Kwangyang Port", Journal of navigation and port research, Vol. 29, No. 10, pp. 921-926. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2005.29.10.921
  13. Song, J. Y. and Sin, C. H.(2005), "An Empirical Study on the Efficiency of Major Container Ports with DEA Model", Journal of navigation and port research, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 195-201. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2005.29.3.195
  14. Yoo, D. H.(2008), "Development of Productivity Measurement Model based on task casuality in a Container Terminal", Dong-A University, Graduate school of Management Information systems, Master Dissertation.
  15. Zheng, X. B. and Kim, Y. S.(2016), "An Efficiency Comparison of Container Terminals in Korea and China by Using Super Efficiency-DEA and Malmquist Productivity Index", Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 1-20