Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회지)

Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Construction of BIBFRAME-Based Bibliographic Data Linkage Structure for Multicultural Institutions

BIBFRAME 기반 복합문화기관 서지데이터 연계 구조 구축

  • 임수인 (중앙대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이승민 (중앙대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2021.08.03
  • Accepted : 2021.08.27
  • Published : 2021.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research proposed an approach for interlinking bibliographic data used in the existing multicultural institutions in order to support information services of multicultural institutions. It constructed a set of linkage properties that can link the FRBR-based BIBFRAME structure with the existing metadata standards currently adopted in multicultural institutions, including MODS, EAD, and CDWA. As a result, the descriptive elements for the Work level, Instance level, Item level, statement of responsibility, subjects were established in the BIBFRAME syntax. A total of 19 upper level elements, 18 sub-elements, and 12 linkage properties were proposed for the linking of bibliographic data, so that a bibliographic environment was established that can interconnect heterogeneous metadata adopted depending on the types of collections. Through the proposed structure, it is expected that it can be applied to provide sufficient information services more efficiently by linking the dispersed bibliographic data of multicultural institutions in an integrated way.

본 연구에서는 복합문화기관의 정보서비스를 지원하기 위해 기존의 복합문화기관에서 사용되는 서지데이터를 상호 연계할 수 있는 방안을 제안하였다. 이를 위해 MODS, EAD, CDWA 등 현재 복합문화기관에서 사용하고 있는 기존 메타데이터를 대상으로, 이들 표준을 FRBR 기반의 BIBFRAME 구조와 연계시킬 수 있는 연계 속성을 구성하였다. 연구 결과, 저작 계층, 인스턴스 계층, 개별자료 계층, 책임표시사항, 주제에 대한 기술요소를 BIBFRAME 기반으로 설정하였으며, 서지데이터의 연계를 위한 총 19개의 상위 요소, 18개의 하위 요소 및 12개의 연계 속성을 도출하였다. 이를 기반으로, 자료 유형에 따라 적용된 이질적인 메타데이터를 상호 연계할 수 있는 서지적 환경을 구축하였다. 이를 통해 복합문화기관의 분산된 서지데이터를 통합적으로 연계함으로써 보다 효율적으로 복합적인 정보서비스를 제공하는데 적용할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, S. J., Bae, S. Y., & Kim, Y. (2014). A Study on the Installation and Operation of Larchiveum in a Small University. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 14(4), 63-97. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2014.14.4.063
  2. Cho, Y. H. (2008). Cooperative Plans for Information Resource Sharing of Cultural Heritage Institutions. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 19(2), 5-21.
  3. Choi, Y. & Rieh, H. Y. (2012). Functional Planning of Larchiveum that Integrates the Functions of Archives, Libraries and Museums. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 23(4), 457-477. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2012.23.4.457
  4. Kwak, S. J. & Lee, J. (2018). Study on Larchiveum Introduction Strategy of Library as a Multi Cultural Facilities. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 29(3), 339-359. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2018.29.3.339
  5. Kwak, S. J., Noh, Y., & Shin, J. M. (2017). A Study on the Space Composition of Library as a Multicultural Institution. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 28(3), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2017.28.3.007
  6. National Library of Korea (2015). A Study on the Policies for the Implementation of Larchiveum in Libraries. Seoul: National Library of Korea.
  7. Yim, T. W. (2014). A Study on Data Model for Integrated Services of Digital Cultural Heritage Resources: Focusing on the Europeana Data Model (EDM). Master's thesis, Graduate School of Records, Archives & Information Science, Myoungji University, Korea.
  8. Bountouri, L. & Gergatsoulis, M. (2009). Interoperability Between Archival and Bibliographic Metadata: An EAD to MODS Crosswalk. Journal of Library Metadata, 9(1), 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386380903095107
  9. Brown, L., Horowitz, E., Johnson, E., Powers M., & Quick, S. (2014). BIBFRAME, Europeana and DPLA: The Future of Open Cultural Heritage?. Cataloging and Metadata Commons, Jan 2014, 1-72.
  10. Date, C. J. (1977). An Introduction to Database System. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publications.
  11. Kirchhoff, T., Schweibenz, W., & Sieglerschmidt, J. (2008). Archives, libraries, museums and the spell of ubiquitous knowledge. Archival science, 8(4), 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9093-2
  12. Lim, S. & Liew, C. L. (2010). GLAM metadata interoperability. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, Gold Coast, Australia, June 2010, 140-143.
  13. Tammaro, A. M. (2016). Participatory Approaches and Innovation in Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums. International Information & Library Review, 48(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2016.1146040
  14. Trant, J. (2009). Emerging convergence? Thoughts on museums, archives, libraries, and professional training. Museum Management and Curatorship, 24(4), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770903314738
  15. Williamson, F. J. (2013). Metadata and Lasting Collaborative Success, Provenance, Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists, 31(2), 149-161.
  16. Yarrow, A., Clubb, B., & Draper, J. L. (2008). Public Libraries, Archives and Museums: Trends in Collaboration and Cooperation. IFLA Professional Reports.
  17. Zorich, D. M., Waibel, G., & Erway, R. (2008). Beyond the silos of the LAMs: collaboration among libraries, archives and museums. OCLC Research. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2008/2008-05.pdf