DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Maximum product of spacings under a generalized Type-II progressive hybrid censoring scheme

  • Young Eun, Jeon (Department of Statistics, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Suk-Bok, Kang (Department of Statistics, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Jung-In, Seo (Department of Information Statistics, Andong National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.05.05
  • 심사 : 2022.08.24
  • 발행 : 2022.11.30

초록

This paper proposes a new estimation method based on the maximum product of spacings for estimating unknown parameters of the three-parameter Weibull distribution under a generalized Type-II progressive hybrid censoring scheme which guarantees a constant number of observations and an appropriate experiment duration. The proposed approach is appropriate for a situation where the maximum likelihood estimation is invalid, especially, when the shape parameter is less than unity. Furthermore, it presents the enhanced performance in terms of the bias through the Monte Carlo simulation. In particular, the superiority of this approach is revealed even under the condition where the maximum likelihood estimation satisfies the classical asymptotic properties. Finally, to illustrate the practical application of the proposed approach, the real data analysis is conducted, and the superiority of the proposed method is demonstrated through a simple goodness-of-fit test.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anatolyev S and Kosenok G (2005). An alternative to maximum likelihood based on spacings, Econometric Theory, 21, 472-476. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466605050255
  2. Basu S, Singh SK, and Singh U (2017). Parameter estimation of inverse Lindley distribution for Type-I censored data, Computational Statistics, 32, 367-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-016-0704-0
  3. Basu S, Singh SK, and Singh U (2018). Bayesian inference using product of spacings function for progressive hybrid Type-I censoring scheme, Statistics, 52, 345-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/02331888.2017.1405419
  4. Cousineau D (2009). Fitting the three-parameter Weibull distribution: Review and evaluation of existing and new methods, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 16, 281-288. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2009.4784578
  5. Cheng RCH and Amin NAK (1983). Estimating parameters in continuous univariate distributions with a shifted origin, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 45, 394-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1983.tb01268.x
  6. Cho Y, Sun H, and Lee K (2015). Exact likelihood inference for an exponential parameter under generalized progressive hybrid censoring scheme, Statistical Methodology, 23, 18-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stamet.2014.09.002
  7. Ekstrom M (1998). On the consistency of the maximum spacing method, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 70, 209-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3758(97)00185-7
  8. Gorny J and Cramer E (2016). Exact likelihood inference for exponential distributions under generalized progressive hybrid censoring schemes, Statistical Methodology, 29, 70-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stamet.2015.10.003
  9. Ranneby B (1984). The maximum spacing method: An estimation method related to the maximum likelihood method, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 11, 93-112.
  10. Smith RL (1985). Maximum likelihood estimation in a class of nonregular cases, Biometrika, 72, 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/72.1.67
  11. Shao Y and Hahn MG (1999). Maximum product of spacings method: A unified formulation with illustration of strong consistency, Illinois Journal of Mathematics, 43, 489-499. https://doi.org/10.1215/ijm/1255985105
  12. Xia ZP, Yu JY, Cheng LD, Liu LF, and Wang WM (2009). Study on the breaking strength of jute fibres using modified Weibull distribution, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 40, 54-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.10.001