DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Specialization and Present Status of Doctor of Osteopathy in the U.S.A

미국의 D.O.의 전문화과정과 현황

  • Taeyoung, Kim (Department of Korean Medicine, School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University) ;
  • Byungmook, Lim (Division of Humanities and Social Medicine, School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University)
  • 김태영 (부산대학교 한의학전문대학원 한의학과) ;
  • 임병묵 (부산대학교 한의학전문대학원 인문사회의학교실)
  • Received : 2022.08.10
  • Accepted : 2022.12.02
  • Published : 2022.12.31

Abstract

Backgrounds : Doctor of Osteopathy (D.O.) in the United States have drawn attention as one of the future models of Korean Medicine doctors in Korea in that they have their own fields of care and therapies that distinguish them from medical doctor (M.D.), but are also able to carry out the treatment of general doctors. By analyzing D.O.'s specialization strategy, this study intends to preview points for establishing the future role of Korean Medicine doctors. Methods : We searched books, research papers, reports, conference presentations, and media articles, and chronologically classified and organized the collected data. In addition, the latest update information on related institutions' web pages and expert opinions released were also reviewed. Results : The D.O. emerged as a form of doctor in alternative medicine, however it rapidly turned to an M.D. substitute during the pandemic of the 1910s and World War II in the 1940s. Through the American Osteopathic Association (AOA)'s organizational activity, curriculum specialization, research development, and financial support, D.O. now has secured the status of M.D. in 50 states and federal law in the US. It has its own and exclusive full practice rights, capable of prescribing drugs and practicing surgery, as well as manual therapy. Beginning in July 2020, M.D.-D.O. achieved the full integration-unification of the professional training and residency program. Conclusions : In order to introduce the D.O. model to Korean Medicine system, it is necessary to strengthen biomedicine in the curriculum, and significantly expand the educational infrastructure and faculty manpower.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee CJ. National Assembly drives public opinion. Medical Times. 2020.12.09. Available at: https://www.medicaltimes.com/Main/News/News View.html?ID=1137636 (Accessed on 2022.06. 01).
  2. Lee HK. Draft of agreement on modern medical device and medical unification contains. Dailypharm news. 2015.12.17. Available at: http://www.dailypharm.com/Users/News/NewsView.html?ID=206738 (Accessed on 2022.06.03).
  3. Wu P, Siu J. A Brief Guide to Osteopathic Medicine For Students, By Students. American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine. 2nd edition. 2015:3-7.
  4. Meyer CT, Price A. Osteopathic medicine: a call for reform. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 1993;93(4):473-485.
  5. Robertson K. Part of cure for doctor shortage: Osteopaths. Sacramento Business Journal. 2012.03.23. Available at: https://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/print-edition/2012/03/23/part-cure-for-doctor-shortage-osteopaths.html (Accessed on 2022.06.05.)
  6. Na S. The professionalization of American D.O.s (In Korean). Presentation handout in the Conference of Korean Medicine Policy Research Society. 2013.
  7. Kim JC. US Doctor of Osteopathy (DO) with a similar starting point to Korean Medicine. Akomnews. 2020.03.26. Available at: https://akomnews.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=news&wr_id=38769 (Accessed on 2022. 06.03)
  8. American ACOM. The Evolution of Osteopathic Medical Education. Available at: https://www.aacom.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/infographic-osteo13.pdf?sfvrsn=6 (Accessed on 2022.06.03)
  9. Still AT. Autobiography of Andrew of T. Still with a History of the Discovery and Development of the Science of Osteopathy. Kirksville, 1897:108.
  10. Gevitz N. A Degree of Difference: The Origins of Osteopathy and First Use of the DO Designation The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 2014;114(1):33.
  11. Bennett F, Bush IE. Dr. A. T. Still's Visit to the Spiritualists' Meeting at Clinton, Iowa. 1903:3-6. Andrew Taylor Still Papers. Museum of Osteopathic Medicine. Kirksville, Missouri. [Accession number: 2009.10.37] Available at: https://mdh.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/atsu/id/1045 (Accessed on 2022.06.03.)
  12. Gevitz N. D.O.s, Osteopathic Medicine In America. 3rd edition (In Korean). 2021.
  13. American Osteopathic Association. 1998 Yearbook and directory of Osteopathic Physicians. 1998
  14. Gevitz N. The D.O.'s: Osteopathic Medicine in America 2nd edition. 2004.
  15. Hulett CMT, Historical Sketch of the AAAO. JAOA. 1901:1:1-15.
  16. Booth ER. History of Osteopathy and Twentieth-Century Medical Practice. Cincinnati, Caxton Press. 1924:106-8.
  17. Samanta A, Samanta J, Gunn M. Legal considerations of clinical guidelines: will NICE make a difference? Journal of The Royal Society of Medicine. 2003;96(3):133-138. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.96.3.133
  18. Ward R. Why some Osteopaths study at Medical Colleges. Osteopathic Physician. 1917;31:25-27
  19. Martin A. Very, Very, Very, Dreadful: The Influenza Pandemic of 1918. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 2018.
  20. McConnell C, Editorial: The Treatment of Influenza. JAOA. 1918;18:83-85.
  21. Eckberg DL. The dilemma of osteopathic physicians and the rationalization of medical practice. Social Science & Medicine. 1987;25(10):1111-1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(87)90352-2
  22. Howell JD. The paradox of osteopathy. New England Journal of Medicine. 1999;341(19):1465-8 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199911043411910
  23. Gevitz N. The transformation of osteopathic medical education. Academic Medicine. 2009;84(6):701-6 https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3181a4049e
  24. Richard A. Economic and Demographic Trends Signal and impending physician Shortage. Health Affairs. 2002;21(1):140-54 https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.21.1.140
  25. Gevitz N. The sword and the scalpel- the osteopathic 'war' to enter the Military Medical Corps: 1916-1966. JAOA. 1998;98(5):279-286.
  26. Carl JM, Kn면 RJ. A Primer on Graduate Medical Education Financing. JAOA. 1993;93(10):1055-9
  27. National board of Osteopathic medical examiners. Complex-USA Bulletin of Information. Available at: https://www.nbome.org/assessments/comlex-usa/bulletin/ (Accessed on 22. 08.20)
  28. Michigan state University. Curriculum of College of Osteopathic Medicine. Available at: https://com.msu.edu/current-students/preclerks hip-medical-education (Accessed on 22.08.20)
  29. AOA. American OMP (Osteopathic Medical Profession) Report. Available at: https://osteopathic.org/about/aoa-statistics (Accessed on 22. 06.13)
  30. US Department of Health and Human Services, et al. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2008-2018 National Summary Tables. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/namcs_summary/2018-namcs-web-tables-508.pdf(Accessed on 22. 06.20)
  31. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Releases 2020-2021 Statistics on Graduate Medical Education Programs and Resident Physicians. 2021.10.11. Available at: https://www.acgme.org/newsroom/2021/10/acgme-releases-2020-2021-statistics-on-graduate-medical-education-programs-and-resident-physicians (Accessed on 22. 06.10)
  32. National Resident Matching Program. NRMP Program Results 2018-2022 Main Residency Match. Available at: https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Program-Results-2018-2022.pdf (Accessed on 22. 07.10)
  33. Healy CJ, Brockway MD, Wilde BB. Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) use among osteopathic physicians in the United States. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. 2021; 121(1):57-61. https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2020-0013
  34. Johnson SM, Kurtz ME. Diminished use of osteopathic manipulative treatment and its impact on the uniqueness of the osteopathic profession. Academic Medicine. 2001;76(8): 821-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200108000-00016
  35. Licciardone J, Gamber R, Cardarelli K. Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes associated with osteopathic manipulative treatment. JAOA. 2002;102(1):13-20.
  36. Stoll ST, Russo DP, Atchison JW. Physicians and patients attitudes toward manual medicine: implications for continuing medical education. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2003;23(1):13-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.1340230104
  37. Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. 2020 Year Book of Korean Medicine. 2022.
  38. American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine. AACOM Reports on Curriculum. Available at https://www.aacom.org/reports-programs-initiatives/aacom-reports/curriculum (Accessed on 2022. 6. 5)
  39. Association of Korean Medicine. Post Corona 19, Expanding Physician Workforce using Korean Medicine Doctors and Colleges - Proceedings of National Assembly Conference. Seoul. 2020.