한국가정과교육학회지 (Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association)

한국가정과교육학회 (Korea Home Economics Education Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

2015 개정 실과(기술·가정) 교육과정의 초·중등 '가정생활' 분야의 연계성 및 중복성 분석

An Analysis on the Connectivity and Duplication of Curriculum Contents between Elementary and Secondary Levels on 'Family Life' Contents Area of the Practical Arts(Technology & Home Economics) Subject in the 2015 Revised Curriculum

  • 윤지현 (춘천교육대학교 실과교육과)
  • Yoon, Ji Hyun (Dept. of Practical Arts Education, Chuncheon National University of Education)
  • 투고 : 2022.03.17
  • 심사 : 2022.03.30
  • 발행 : 2022.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 교육과정 분석을 위한 연계성 및 중복성의 준거유형을 개발하여 현행 2015개정교육과정의 초등 및 중등의 '가정생활' 분야의 내용 연계성 및 중복성을 분석함으로써 차기 교육과정 구성을 위한 기초 자료를 제공하는 데 있다. 교육과정 구조화의 원리가 초·중등에 차이가 있음을 고려하여 연계성과 중복성을 분석한 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 교육과정 내용 체계화 구조를 분석하기 위한 연계성과 중복성의 준거 유형들을 개발하였다. 연계성은 '분절된 위계형'과 '나선의 위계형'으로 나누어 볼 수 있다. 중복성은 '반복형'(상), '재현형'과 '심화형'(중간), '치환형'과 '생략형'(하) 등으로 구분할 수 있는데 중간 정도의 중복성을 보일 경우 연계성이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 초·중·고 내용을 비교한 결과, '인간발달과 가족' 영역에서 심화형 중복성을 나타내어 높은 연계성을 보이며, '가정생활과 안전'에서는 '안전' 개념이, '자원관리와 자립'에서는 '생애설계' 개념에서 낮은 연계성을 보였다. 셋째, 교육과정 성취기준을 분석한 결과, 초등에 비해 중등의 '가정' 내용은 난이도와 교과 내용의 양의 증가폭이 매우 큰 것으로 나타났다. 전체적으로 심화형 중복성을 보이며 연계성이 높아 체계적으로 교육과정을 구성하고 있으나 '가정생활' 분야의 핵심 개념 가운데 '안전'과 '생애설계'는 학교급 간의 연계성이 낮은 편이었고 '생활문화'와 '관리'는 중간 정도의 연계성을 보이며 '발달'과 '관계'는 높은 연계성을 나타내고 있었다. 나선형 교육과정으로 교과의 내용을 구조화 할 때는 초등과 중등의 내용을 유기적으로 연계할 필요가 있다. 이를 위해서는 실과와 기술·가정 각각의 학교급별 교과 지식체계를 구성하는 특성들을 고려한 핵심적인 개념을 중심으로 해야 하고, 적정한 분량 및 난이도를 고려해야 하며, 적정한 내용 중복의 정도를 고려해야 하고, 동일 학교급 내에서 동일 주제의 반복을 최소화 할 필요가 있다.

The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which the contents of elementary and secondary curricula are connected and overlapped in the 'family life' area of Practical Arts(Technology & Home Economics) subjects. The procedure and results are as were like below. First, the types of criteria for analyzing curriculum contents are developed. The connectivity are classified as 'discontinuous hierarchy' and 'spiral hierarchy' and duplication are classified as 'repetition (high level of overlapping)', 'reproducing', 'deepening (intermediate level of overlapping)', 'substitution', and 'omission (low level of overlapping)'. Second, as a result of analyzing the contents of elementary and secondary curricula, the 'Human Development' area showed higher connectivity with a deepening type of duplication. The 'Safety' and the 'Lifelong Planning' concepts showed lower connectivity. Third, as a result of analyzing the achievement standards of the 2015 Curriculum, the secondary Home Economics curriculum showed a considerable increase in the level of difficulty and the volume compared to the elementary curriculum. There was low connectivity between the contents of elementary and secondary curricula in the core concepts 'Safety' and 'Lifelong Planning', an intermediate level of connectivity in 'Life Culture' and 'Management', and high connectivity in 'Development' and 'Relationship'. Also, there was a high level of duplication in the core concepts 'Safety' and 'Lifelong Planning', being classified as 'reproducing', 'substitution', and 'omission', analyzed to have low connectivity. When structuring the curriculum contents with a spiral hierarchy, one should connect the elementary and secondary school contents organically: the hierarchy with core concepts considering the different characters of constructuring knowledge in each school level, with a moderate volume, with a moderate difficulty level, with a moderate level of duplication of the contents, and with the minimum level of repetition of the same topics within the same school level.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bang, G. H. (2006). Development of integrative instructional design model and strategy for Practical Arts education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 19(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17055/JPAER.2013.19.2.1
  2. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  3. Choi, J. Y. (2006). The rationale of an integrative approach in Practical Arts education on John Dewey's 'an Experience'. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 19(1), 41-56.
  4. Choi, J. Y. (2018). The orientation of integration in Practical Arts education (PAE), based on Oakeshott's theory of two-fold structure. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 31(4), 285-304. https://doi.org/10.24062/kpae.2018.31.4.285
  5. Eun, J.-Y. (2018). A study on the complex application process of the contents construction principles of elementary social studies curriculum - Focused on case analysis based on autobiographical reflective experiences. Social Studies Education, 57(4), 59-80. https://doi.org/10.37561/sse.2018.12.57.4.59
  6. Go, I. G. (2020). Development of integrated unit of agriculture and dietary education applying Drake's KDB mode. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 33(1), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.24062/kpae.2020.33.1.25
  7. Han, S. E. (2006). The analysis on contents and articulation of consumer education in the Practical Arts(Technology & Home Economics) textbooks of elementary, middle, high school according to the 7th national curriculum. Unpublished Master Thesis, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
  8. Jeon, J. W. (2018). An analysis of the connectivity of contents by grade clusters in elementary social studies - Focusing on curriculum achievement standards revised in 2015. Social Studies Education, 57(4), 235-252. https://doi.org/10.37561/sse.2018.12.57.4.235
  9. Jeon, S. K. (2012). The critical reflection and assignment for 2011 Practical Arts curriculum revision. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 25(2), 103-128.
  10. Jeong, D. A., Nam, S. J., & Kwon, J. H. (2013). Analysis of system in geographical concepts of social studies in elementary schools- Focused on 'concept map' -. The Journal of The Korean Association of Geographic and Environmental Education, 21(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.17279/JKAGEE.2013.21.1.1
  11. Jung, J. Y., Cho, Y. J., & Choi, K. E. (2016). A study on the assessment and organization of content schemes for clothing and textile education area in 2015 revised Practical Arts Education curriculum. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 29(1), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.20954/jkpae.2016.03.29.1.249
  12. Kim, E.-L., Yu, N. S., & Chae, J.-H. (2015). The analyses of duplicated contents of 'Family life' unit of Home Economics and other subject textbooks for the middle school students-Focusing on the 2009 revised curriculum -. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 27(1), 85-109.
  13. Kim, J. S., & Jeong, J. W. (2017). The analysis on the connectivity of "Invention Education' area of Practical Arts(Technology and Home Economics) in the 2009 revised curriculum. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 17(3), 68-86.
  14. Kim, S. J., & Choi, J. Y. (2014). The development of concept maps for integration in subject based on achievement standards in 2009 revised curriculum of the Practical Arts. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 20(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.17055/jpaer.2014.20.1.1
  15. Lee, C. S. (2006). Content analysis of sequence for Technology education in Practical Arts. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 19(1), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.17055/jpaer.2013.19.1.23
  16. Lee, E. J., & Shin, H. W. (2007). The connection analysis on the areas of clothing and textiles in Practical Arts, Technology and Home Economics, and the Science of Home Economics courses. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 19(1), 1-14.
  17. Lee, J. Y., & Yu, N. S. (2015). The analyses of duplicated contents of 'Consumer Life' area in Technology & Home Economics and other subject textbooks for middle and high school students. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 27(4), 121-140. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2015.12.27.4.121
  18. Ministry of Education (2011). National curriculum for Practical Arts(Technology.Home Economics) curriculum revised in 2011 (Notification No. 2011-361, Separate 10). Sejong: Author.
  19. Ministry of Education (2015). National curriculum for Practical Arts(Technology.Home Economics)/Informatics curriculum revised in 2015 (Notification No. 2015-74, Separate 10). Sejong: Author.
  20. Nam, S.-J. (2016). Core concepts of Home Economics: Management and planning of life-cycle. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 28(2), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2016.06.28.2.51
  21. Park, C. E., & Kim, Y. K. (2019). Content analysis of food and nutrition unit in high school textbooks of Home Economics: Focus on the national curriculums from 7th to 2015 revised. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 31(4), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2019.12.31.4.97
  22. Son, K. H., Kim, J. W., & Lee, S. W. (2017). A comparative analysis and theme design of the Elementary Biotechnological education contents connected with middle school in Practical Arts. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 28(2), 109-126.
  23. Wang, S. S., Ryu, K. H., & Baek. J. W. (2012). Analysis on articulations of the domain human development and family in the subject of Practical Arts(Technology and Home Economics). Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 24(1), 1-20.
  24. Yoon, J. H., & Paek, J. J. (2001). A comparative study on the contents and objectives of all subjects which related 'Practical Arts Education' in elementary school. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 14(4), 123-158.