DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fit Performance Comparison Between OPC and CNC Based on Number of Ambient Aerosol Particles

시험환경 내 입자수에 대한 OPC, CNC 장비 간 마스크 밀착 성능비교

  • Seo, Hyekyung (College of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Shinhan University) ;
  • Jang, Hoyeong (College of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Shinhan University) ;
  • Shim, Sua (College of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Shinhan University) ;
  • Kim, Huiju (College of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Shinhan University) ;
  • Han, Donhee (Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, Inje University)
  • 서혜경 (신한대학교 바이오 생태보건대학) ;
  • 장호영 (신한대학교 바이오 생태보건대학) ;
  • 심수아 (신한대학교 바이오 생태보건대학) ;
  • 김희주 (신한대학교 바이오 생태보건대학) ;
  • 한돈희 (인제대학교 보건안전공학과)
  • Received : 2022.05.16
  • Accepted : 2022.06.17
  • Published : 2022.06.30

Abstract

Objectives: Fit performance may vary depending on the ambient aerosol number and ratio in respective test environment. Although several instrument can measure it, they differ with respect to the measurement principle and the range of ambient aerosols collected to calculate the fit factor. Methods: In this study, the fit performance between a condensation nuclei counter(CNC) and an optical particle counter(OPC) was compared according to ambient aerosol number concentration, and evaluated consistency. One type respirators(N95 masks) was worn by 50 participants PortaCount®(Pro+ 8038) and MT®(05U) were connected with one probe to one mask, and Fit Factors(FFs) were measured simultaneously. Results: The interclass correlation coefficient of the fit factor and ambient aerosol number, as measured by the two instrument, was 0.82 and 0.79, respectively, indicating a high consistency level. On the other hand there was a significant correlation between the successful test performance of the OPC instrument and the ambient aerosol number. Conclusions: The test was passed with the CNC and OPC instruments when the ambient aerosol number was 635-3,332 particles/cm3 and 368-1,976 particles/cm3, respectively. Thus, the ideal ambient aerosol number of particles differed between the two instrument.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 (사)한국호흡보호구학회 기초연구 활동으로 수행하였으며 연구비 지원 기관인 (주)태원시바타에 감사드립니다. 또한 입자발생 환경 구축을 위한 실험에 도움을 준 (주)에이피엠엔지니어링 나상철 과장님과 통계자문에 협조해 준 (국)한국한의학연구소 강병갑 박사님께 감사드립니다.

References

  1. Australian Occupational Safety and Health Act(AOSH-Act). 2015
  2. Canada Occupational Health and Safety Regulations (Canada OHSR) (SOR/86-304). Canadian Minister of Justice. (Last amended on October 31, 2014)
  3. Canadian Standards Association (CSA). Standard Z94. 4-02. Selection, use, and care of respirators. Toronto, Canada: CSA Group. 2011
  4. Charney W. Handbook of modern hospital safety. 2nd Edition, New York: CRC Press. ISBN-13: 987-1420047851 2009;18-1
  5. Eikenberry SE, Mancuso M, Iboi E, Phan T, Eikenberry K et al. To mask or not to mask: Modeling the potential for face mask use by the general public to curtail the COVID-19 pandemic. Infectious Disease Modelling 2020;5: 293-308 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idm.2020.04.001
  6. Eissenberg T, Kanj SS, Shihadeh AL. Treat COVID-19 as Though It Is Airborne: It May Be. AANA Journal 2020;88(3):29-30 (www.anna.com/aanajournalonline)
  7. Eoh WS, Choi Y, Shin CS. Comparison of Effects of Mask Style and Donning Training on Fit Factors of Particulate Filtering Facepiece Respirators. J Korean Soc Saf 2016;31(5):35-41 https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2016.31.5.35
  8. Han DH, Kim HW, Jang YJ, Myong JP, Yang HS et al. A study on the actual results and draftings regulations of Fit testing(I) OSHRI. 2017-969. Available from: URL:http://oshri.kosha.or.kr
  9. International Standard Organization (ISO). ISO 16975-3: 2017(en) Respiratory protective devices - Selection, use and maintenance - Part 3: Fit-testing procedures (Accessed 20 March 2021). Available from: URL:https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:16975:-3:ed-1:v1:en
  10. Itaya Y, Tanihata S, Khi MM, Goto F, Murata M. Case report of Fit Test using Mask Fitting Tester, Abstract of lectures on research presentations related to Respiratory protection, International Society for Respiratory Protection(ISRP), Japan Branch/Japan Respirator Manufacturers Association co-hosted. 2019
  11. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (JMHLW). Notice No. 286, Method of measuring welding fume concentration related to indoor workplaces continuously working such as metal arc welding, etc. 2020
  12. Kang JO. Occupational infections of Health Care Personnel in Korea, Hanyang Medical Rew. 2011;31(3):200-210 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.7599/hmr.2011.31.3.200)
  13. Kim HW, Baek JU, Seo HK, Lee JE, Myong JP et al. Assessing real-time performance of N95 respirators for health care workers by simulated workplace protection factors, Ind. Health. 2015;53:553-561 (doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2014-0259)
  14. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency(KOSHA). Guidelines for selection, use and care of respirator. [Accessed 2020 oct 8] Available from: URL: https://www.kosha.or.kr/kosha/info/searchTechnicalGuidelines.do
  15. Kumar P & Morawska L. Could Fighting Airborne Transmission Be the Next Line of Defence Against COVID-19 Spread?, City and Environment Interactions. 2020;4 100033 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cacint.2020.100033
  16. Lee BU. Airborne Transmission of the SARS -CoV-2 Delta Variant and the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant, Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 2021;22(1);1-3 (https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.210250)
  17. Occupational Health and Safety Act (OSHAct). Respiratory protection. (Accessed 20 March 2021). Available from: URL:https://www.osha.gov/lawsregs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.134
  18. Standards Australia. Select- ion, use and maintenance of respiratory protective equipment. Sydney, Australia: Standar- ds Australia. AS/NZS 2009;1715
  19. Seo HK, Kwon YI, Myong JP, Kang BK. Fit comparison of Domestic N95 Medical Masks in a Fit test. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2021;31(1):94-104 (https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2021.31.1.94)
  20. The Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA). KOSHA Guide H-82 Technical guidance on the use and management of individual protection.; 2020
  21. Wu B, Leppanen M, Yermakov M, Grinshpun SA. Evaluation of a New Instrument for Aerosol Quantitative Fit Testing. J of ISRP 2017;34(2):111-127
  22. Wu B, Leppanen M, Yermakov M, Grinshpun SA. Utility of an Optical Particle Counting Instrument for Quantitative Respirator Fit Testing with N95 Filtering Facepieces. J of ISRP 2018;35(1):14-25