Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Alternative Materials Collection Evaluation Using a National Alternative Materials Union Catalog

국가대체자료종합목록을 이용한 시각장애인 대체자료 장서 평가 연구

  • Received : 2022.08.12
  • Accepted : 2022.09.10
  • Published : 2022.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to diagnose the current status of alternative materials in Korea and to suggest directions and goals for the development of alternative materials. The comprehensive list of national alternative materials and the list of popular and new books were analyzed using the collection evaluation method. Results first the percentage of alternative material collections based on the popular book list for 10 years is 90.1%. The production rate of alternative materials is low in the subjects of 'Language', 'Art' and 'Technology and Science'. Most of the service formats were 'text only daisy'. Second, the CCHR(Common Collection Holding Ratio) and CUI(Collection Uniqueness index) of alternative materials were analyzed using the union catalog. Libraries with a large volume of books have a high proportion of CCHR and CUI. Topics with the highest CCHR are 'Literature' and 'Social Science'. The subjects with the highest collection uniqueness index are 'religion', 'art', and 'language'. Third, the replacement ratio of new books for 3 years is 5.09%. During the same period, the average book purchase rate of public libraries was 8.83%. The average book purchase rate in public libraries is 8.83%, and it is necessary to increase the collection rate of alternative materials based on this ratio.

본 연구는 국내에서 서비스되는 대체자료 장서 수준을 진단하고 향후 대체자료 장서개발의 방향성과 목표지향점을 제시하는 데 목적이 있다. 국가대체자료종합목록과 국내 인기도서 및 신간도서 목록을 장서기반 평가방법을 활용하여 비교·분석하였다. 연구결과 첫째, 10년간 인기도서 목록 기준 대체자료 장서 비율은 90.1%이다. '언어', '예술', '기술과학' 주제의 대체자료 장서 비율이 낮은 편이며, 제작 매체별은 '텍스트 데이지자료'의 비율이 높았다. 둘째, 국가대체자료종합목록을 기준으로 주제별, 매체별, 제작기관별 공통장서 확보율과 장서고유성 지수를 분석한 결과 대체자료의 소장 장서량이 많은 도서관에서 공통장서와 고유장서의 편향성이 높게 나타났다. 공통장서 확보율이 높은 주제는 문학과 사회과학 순이며, 장서고유성 지수가 높은 주제는 종교, 예술, 언어 순으로 나타났다. 셋째, 최근 3년간 신간도서의 대체자료 장서 비율은 5.09%이며 같은 기간 동안 공공도서관의 평균 도서구입율은 8.83%이다. 신간도서 대비 대체자료 장서 비율의 적정 기준은 존재하지 않으며 시각장애인의 정보격차 해소를 위해 신간도서 대비 대체자료 장서 비율을 공공도서관 도서구입율 수준으로 높일 것을 제언하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, Wonsil & Chung, Eunkyung (2019). An analysis on collection profiles of western monographs with ILL data for academic libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 36(3), 109-129. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2019.36.3.109
  2. Ha, SungJoon (2013. February 1). Do you know the term "book famine"?. Ablenews. Available: http://www.ablenews.co.kr/News/NewsContent.aspx?CategoryCode=0006&NewsCode=000620130130085250987784
  3. Kang, Seonggoo & Lim, Kyoung-won (2017). A study on the change of production strategy and environment for alternative material for person with special needs. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 48(4), 283-301. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.48.201712.283
  4. Kim, Sun-Ae & Lee, Soo-Sang (2006). Quality evaluation of a shared cataloging db: the case of KOLIS-NET. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40(1), 95-117. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.1.095
  5. Lee, Jae-Whoan (2002). Quality evaluation and management of a shared cataloging DB: the case of KERIS UNICAT DB. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 36(1), 61-90. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2002.36.1.061
  6. Lee, Ji-Won & Lee, Jae-Yun (2018). An analysis of korean university library holdings of western language books using a union catalog database. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(1), 205-229. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.1.205
  7. Lee, You-Jeong (2006). A study on quality evaluation of the UNICAT. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 37(3), 289-307.
  8. Ministry of Culture Sports and Tourism (2021). National Library Statistics System: 2017-2021 Public Library Statistical Survey Results. Available: https://www.libsta.go.kr/board/statref/detail/6149
  9. Oh, Ji-Eun & Jeong, Dong-Youl (2015). A study on the analysis of rate of use and core collection for collection evaluation in public libraries: in the case of Gwangjin district public library. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 49(1), 201-221. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.1.201
  10. Oh, Seonkyung (2017). A study on the improvement and the production state of alternative materials of special libraries for the visually disabled in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 51(3), 215-246. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2017.51.3.215
  11. Yoon, HeeYoon (2010). Analysis of alternative formats development policy for the disabled persons in the major countries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.41.1.201003.29
  12. Bain, C. D., Colosimo, A. L., Mawhinney, T., & Houle, L. (2016). Using WorldShare collection evaluation to analyze physical science and engineering monograph holdings by discipline. Collection Management, 41(6), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2016.1208132
  13. Beals, J. B. & Gilmour, R. (2007). Assessing collections using brief tests and WorldCat collection analysis. Collection Building, 26(4), 104-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/01604950710831898
  14. Hubbard, D. E. & Neville, B. D. (2012). Benchmarking mechanical engineering collections using the WorldCat collection analysis tool. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 36(3-4), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcats.2012.09.001
  15. Monroe-Gulick, A. & Currie, L. (2011). Using the WorldCat collection analysis tool: experiences from the university of kansas libraries. Collection Management, 36(4), 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2011.604907
  16. Perrault, A. H. (1994). The shrinking national collection: A study of the effects of the diversion of funds from monographs to serials on the monograph collections of research libraries. Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory, 18(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-6408(94)90067-1
  17. Perrault, A. H. (1999). National collecting trends: collection analysis methods and findings. Library & Information Science Research, 21(1), 47-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(99)80005-X
  18. Wilen, R. & Ahtola, A. (2006). Collection evaluation: micro and macro levels - preliminary guidelines and the results of a pilot study of two Finnish University Libraries. Signum 3, 39-43. Retrieved from https://journal.fi/signum/article/download/3390/3140/7720