Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회지)

Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Measuring the Economic Value of a Self Archiving and Journal Repository System for Open Access

오픈액세스를 위한 리포지터리 시스템에 대한 수요 분석과 경제적 가치 측정

  • 권나현 (명지대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 표순희 (숭의여자대학교 문헌정보과)
  • Received : 2022.08.28
  • Accepted : 2022.09.13
  • Published : 2022.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study purposed to measure the economic value of repository services of the National Open Access Platform (AccessON), namely Self Archiving and Journal Repository. The value of Self Archiving was measured by applying time-saving value and the value of Journal Repositories by applying market analogy. Based on existing statistics, in-depth interviews with service beneficiaries and stakeholders, and a survey administered to 1,313 researchers, the value of Self Archiving was estimated to be 145 million won and an additional 12 million won with the OA legalization. The value of Journal Repositories was estimated to be 31.2 billion won. The total value of the repository services was 31.35 billion won over the 8-year business period. This result presented an estimated economic value of a national OA repository from the key beneficiaries' perspectives.

본 연구는 국가오픈액세스플랫폼(AccessON)의 개인 연구저작물 리포지터리인 Self Archiving과 학회의 Journal Repository 서비스의 경제적 가치측정을 목적으로 수행되었다. 문헌조사와 서비스 수혜자 및 관계자 15명과의 심층면담, 국내 연구자 1,313명을 대상으로 한 설문조사를 토대로 가치 측정에 필요한 데이터를 수집하였다. Self Archiving의 가치는 시간가치법을 적용하여 연구자 개인의 연간 절감 시간가치를 측정하였다. 국내 연구자들의 실제 학술활동에 기반하여 연구자 시간당 인건비, 국내생산 OA 논문 편수 등과 같은 요소들을 측정한 후, 연도별 이용 목표치를 토대로 총 수요를 추정하여 총 가치를 산출하였다. Journal Repository는 시장유추법을 적용하여, 상용 서비스의 객단가를 분석하고 이를 토대로 절감비용을 산출하였다. 분석결과, 총 사업기간 8년 동안 Self Archiving의 가치는 1억 450만 원, Journal Repository는 312억 원으로 산출되었다. 두 서비스의 총 가치는 8년간 총 313.5억 원, 연평균 390억 원으로 추정되었다. OA 환경 구축을 위한 핵심 전략인 개인 및 학회 리포지터리 서비스의 경제적 가치를 핵심 수혜자 관점에서 실증적으로 추정했다는 데서 본 연구의 의의를 찾을 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cha, Mikyeong, Song, Kyeong-Jin, & Kim, Na-Young (2017). Laws and regulations for open access of research papers from national research and development projects. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 51(1), 147-174. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2017.51.1.147
  2. Chang, Won-Kyu (2017). A Legislative Study on the Diffusion of Open Accesses (Current Issue 2017-15). https://doi.org/10.23000/TRKO201800037643
  3. Cho, Hye-Min (2016). Journal Publishing and Partners. Tutorials for Journal Editors (2016-M02). Seoul: Korean Council of Science Editors.
  4. KCI (2022) Data Deployment Statistics. Available: https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/po/statistics/poStatisticsMain.kci?tab_code=Tab3
  5. Kim, GyuHwan, Lee, Soo-Sang, Lee, Jae Yun, Joung, KyoungHee, Kang, Heekyung, Seo, Sang Won, Jang, Sang-Hyun, Kim, Dongwoo, & Park, Yeonhee (2020). A Study on the Publication and Distribution Model for Revitalizing Open Access to Domestic Academic Journals. Korea Education and Research Information Service.
  6. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (2019). Laws and Regulations for Open Access of Public-Funded Research Products.
  7. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (2022). About AccessON. AccessON National Open Access Platform homepage. Available: https://accesson.kisti.re.kr/guide/koar/intro.do
  8. Pyo, Soon Hee & Jeong, Dong Youl (2008). A study on the method of measuring the economic use value of public libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(2), 209-234. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.2.209
  9. Seo, Tae-Sul, Heo, Seon, & Noh, Kyung-Ran (2009). Public access policy for open access of scholarly publications. KISTI Knowledge Report, 4, 1-24.
  10. Elliott, D. S., Holt, G. E., Hayden, S. W., & Holt, L. E. (2007). Measuring Your Library's Value. Chicago: American Library Association.
  11. European Commission (2022). Horizon 2020. Available: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-2020_en
  12. European Science Foundation (2022). cOAlition S. Available: https://www.coalition-s.org/
  13. Finch, J., Bell S., Bellingan, L., Campbell, R., Donnelly, P., Gardner, R., Hall, M., Hall, S., Kiley, R., van der Stelt, W., Sweeney, D., Sykes, P., Tickell, A., Wissenburg, A., Egginton, R., & Jubb, M. (2013). Working group on expanding access to published research findings. Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications. Executive summary. International Microbiology, 16(2), 125-32. https://doi.org/10.2436/20.1501.01.187
  14. Houghton, J. W. (2009). Open access: what are the economic benefits? a comparison of the United Kingdom, Netherlands and Denmark. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1492578
  15. Houghton, J. W., Rasmussen, B., Sheehan, P., Oppenheim, C., Morris, A., & Creaser, C., Greenwood, H., Summers, M. A., & Gourlay, A. (2009). Economic implications of alternative scholarly publishing models: exploring the costs and benefits. JISC EI-ASPM Project. A report to the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Economic-implications-of-alternative-scholarly-%3A-A-Houghton-Rasmussen/9a3eae6b1ebc6529518aa77ea034a73a292b6cb8
  16. Kingma, B. R. (2001). The economics of information: a guide to economic and cost-benefit analysis for information professionals. 2nd ed. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.
  17. Marx, W. & Bornmann, L. (2015). On the causes of subject-specific citation rates in Web of Science. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1823-1827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1499-9
  18. National Library of Medicine (2022). PubMed Central. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
  19. VEVAM (2015). The Dutch Copyright Act. Available: https://www.vevam.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Dutch-Copyright-Act-2015.pdf