DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

∆-TRANSITIVITY FOR SEMIGROUP ACTIONS

  • Received : 2022.02.16
  • Accepted : 2022.04.22
  • Published : 2023.03.31

Abstract

In this paper, we study ∆-transitivity, ∆-weak mixing and ∆-mixing for semigroup actions and give several characterizations of them, which generalize related results in the literature.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The author would like to thank Jian Li and Yini Yang for helpful suggestions. The author was supported by NNSF of China (grant number 12001239) and Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2020A1515111113) and YITP of Guangdong Provincial Department of Education of China (grant number 2019KQNCX145).

References

  1. F. Blanchard and W. Huang, Entropy sets, weakly mixing sets and entropy capacity, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 20 (2008), no. 2, 275-311. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2008.20.275
  2. G. Cairns, A. Kolganova, and A. Nielsen, Topological transitivity and mixing notions for group actions, Rocky Mountain J. Math. 37 (2007), no. 2, 371-397. https://doi.org/10.1216/rmjm/1181068757
  3. Z. Chen, J. Li, and J. Lu, On multi-transitivity with respect to a vector, Sci. China Math. 57 (2014), no. 8, 1639-1648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-014-4797-z
  4. Z. Chen, J. Li, and J. Lu, Point transitivity, ∆-transitivity and multi-minimality, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 35 (2015), no. 5, 1423-1442. https://doi.org/10.1017/etds.2013.106
  5. W. Huang, J. Li, X. Ye, and X. Zhou, Positive topological entropy and ∆-weakly mixing sets, Adv. Math. 306 (2017), 653-683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2016.10.029
  6. E. Kontorovich and M. Megrelishvili, A note on sensitivity of semigroup actions, Semigroup Forum 76 (2008), no. 1, 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00233-007-9033-5
  7. D. Kwietniak and P. Oprocha, On weak mixing, minimality and weak disjointness of all iterates, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 32 (2012), no. 5, 1661-1672. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143385711000599
  8. K. Liu, ∆-weakly mixing subset in positive entropy actions of a nilpotent group, J. Differential Equations 267 (2019), no. 1, 525-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2019.01.018
  9. T. K. S. Moothathu, Diagonal points having dense orbit, Colloq. Math. 120 (2010), no. 1, 127-138. https://doi.org/10.4064/cm120-1-9
  10. P. Oprocha and G. Zhang, On local aspects of topological weak mixing in dimension one and beyond, Studia Math. 202 (2011), no. 3, 261-288. https://doi.org/10.4064/sm202-3-4
  11. P. Oprocha and G. Zhang, Topological aspects of dynamics of pairs, tuples and sets, in Recent progress in general topology. III, 665-709, Atlantis Press, Paris, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-024-9_16
  12. P. Oprocha and G. Zhang, On local aspects of topological weak mixing, sequence entropy and chaos, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 34 (2014), no. 5, 1615-1639. https://doi.org/10.1017/etds.2013.13
  13. F. Polo, Sensitive dependence on initial conditions and chaotic group actions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 138 (2010), no. 8, 2815-2826. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-10-10286-X
  14. J. Wang, Almost strong mixing group actions in topological dynamics, arXiv:1405.5971 [math.DS].
  15. H. Wang, Z. Chen, and H. Fu, M-systems and scattering systems of semigroup actions, Semigroup Forum 91 (2015), no. 3, 699-717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00233-015-9736-y
  16. T. Zeng, Multi-transitivity and ∆-transitivity for semigroup actions, Topology Appl. 226 (2017), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.topol.2017.04.030