International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication

The Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication (한국인터넷방송통신학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Paradigms of Information Innovation 3.0 for Hyper-connective Internet of Things Technology with Extended Technological Organization Environment Framework

  • Received : 2023.02.07
  • Accepted : 2023.02.13
  • Published : 2023.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recent information and communication technologies have already opened up new prospects for technology groups, especially in a knowledge-based society. A contemporary technological era, which can be stated as the hyper-connective Internet of Things surpassed the traditional service pattern and innovation pattern by conveying personalized, localized, and con-text-aware services close to different actors and users. The conventional boundary of the organization is disbanding as well as traditional innovation and research & development limits. This research article conducts a preliminary study about the hyper-connective Internet of Things technology portent with innovation 3.0 version based on an extended technological organization environment framework (E-TOEF). This article discusses the emergence of innovation 3.0 as a paradigm shift from a manufacturing paradigm to an actor-oriented paradigm. There is a need to shift from a manufacturing mindset to more user ergonomics and be aware of the potential of hyper-connective IoT on the revolution of innovation patterns to be more cooperative, open, and user-centered. Besides, this article would strain some conceptual approaches for the next-generation innovation paradigm known as "hyper-connective IoT" entitled innovation 3.0. This new innovation version goes beyond open innovation and undeniably clearly beyond closed innovation which was an earlier version.

Keywords

References

  1. S. M. Lee, D. L. Olson, and S. Trimi, "The Impact of Convergence on Organizational Innovation," Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 218-225, July 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2010.03.004
  2. A. Ioanid, D. C. Deselnicu, and G. Militaru, "The Impact of Social Networks on SME's Innovation Potential," Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 22, pp. 936-941, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.133
  3. J. C. Guan, R. C. M. Yam, E P Y Tang, and A K W Lau, "Innovation Strategy and Performance during Economic Transition," Research Policy; Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 802-812, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.009
  4. V. Lazzarotti and R. Manzini, "Different Modes of Open Innovation: A Theoretical Framework and an Empirical Study," International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 615-636, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919609002443
  5. Q. Yi and J. Chung, "Research of Character Design in Side-scrolling Horror Puzzle Games," International Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 77-82, June 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7236/IJASC.2022.11.2.77
  6. R. Shultz Colby, "Embodying Empathy: Using Game Design as a Maker Pedagogy to Teach Design Thinking," Technical Communication Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 181-195, June 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2022.2077453
  7. J. Zittrain, The Future of the Internet: And How to Stop It, Yale University Press, pp. 98, 2008.
  8. A. Stirling, "Opening Up" and "Closing Down" Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal Technology," Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 262-294, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311265
  9. J. Schot, "Confronting the Second-Deep Transition through the Historical Imagination," Technology and Culture, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 445-456, April 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2016.0044
  10. N. Radjou, J. Prabhu, and S. Ahuja, Jugaad Innovation: Think Frugal, Be Flexible, and Generate Breakthrough Growth, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 105, 2012.
  11. M. Mazzucato and C. Perez, Innovation as Growth Policy, Oxford University Press, pp. 229-264, 2015.
  12. L. Schilbach, V. I. Muller, F. Hoffstaedter, M. Clos, R. Goya-Maldonado, O. Gruber, and S. B. Eickhoff, "Meta-Analytically Informed Network Analysis of Resting-State Reveals Hyperconnectivity in an Introspective Socio-Affective Network in Depression," PLoS one, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094973
  13. J. J. Hyun, "A Study on Education Utilizing Meta verse for Effective Communication in a Convergence Subject," International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication (IJIBC), Vol.13, No.4, pp. 129-134, 2021. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7236/IJIBC.2021.13.4.129
  14. P. Haapalainen and J. Kantola, "Taxonomy of Knowledge Management in Open Innovations," Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 3, pp. 688-695, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.307
  15. J. Hafkesbrink, H. U. Hoppe, and J. H. Schlichter, Competence Management for Open Innovation: Tools and IT Support to Unlock the Innovation Potential Beyond Company Boundaries, BoD-Books on Demand, pp. 205-236, 2010.
  16. L. Cai, B Chen, J Chen, and G. D. Bruton, "Dysfunctional Competition & Innovation Strategy of New Ventures as They Mature," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 78, pp. 111-118. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.008
  17. H. K. Kim and J. H. Do, "A Study on the Regulatory Standards and Rationale of OTT Adoption," The Journal of The Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication (IIBC), Vol. 22, No. 4, pp.141-148. 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7236/JIIBC.2022.22.4.141
  18. J. Sydow, How Can Systems Trust Systems? A Structuration Perspective on Trust-Building in Inter-organization, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 377-392, 2006.