References
- Pearson DC, Adamson PA. The ideal nasal profile: rhinoplasty patients vs the general public. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6(04):257-262 https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.6.4.257
- Broer PN. Reply: nasal aesthetics: a cross-cultural analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132(04):665e-666e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a05302
- Naini FB, Cobourne MT, Garagiola U, McDonald F, Wertheim D. Nasofrontal angle and nasal dorsal aesthetics: a quantitative investigation of idealized and normative values. Facial Plast Surg 2016;32(04):444-451 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1584234
- Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC, Munro IR. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: revision of neoclassical canons. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;75(03):328-338 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198503000-00005
- Polk MS Jr, Farman AG, Yancey JA, Gholston LR, Johnson BE, Regennitter FJ. Soft tissue profile: a survey of African-American preference. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108(01):90-101 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70071-4
- Sinno HH, Markarian MK, Ibrahim AMS, Lin SJ. The ideal nasolabial angle in rhinoplasty: a preference analysis of the general population. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134(02):201-210 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000385
- Ahmed O, Dhinsa A, Popenko N, Osann K, Crumley RL, Wong BJ. Population-based assessment of currently proposed ideals of nasal tip projection and rotation in young women. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2014;16(05):310-318 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2014.228
- Verhulst A, Hol M, Vreeken R, Becking A, Ulrich D, Maal T. Three-dimensional imaging of the face: a comparison between three different imaging modalities. Aesthet Surg J 2018;38(06):579-585 https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx227
- Devcic Z, Rayikanti BA, Hevia JP, Popenko NA, Karimi K, Wong BJ. Nasal tip projection and facial attractiveness. Laryngoscope 2011;121(07):1388-1394 https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21804
- Armijo BS, Brown M, Guyuron B. Defining the ideal nasolabial angle. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129(03):759-764 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402e12
- Broer PN, Buonocore S, Morillas A, et al. Nasal aesthetics: a cross-cultural analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130(06):843e-850e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826da0c1
- Mafi AA, Shahverdiani R, Mafi P. Ideal soft tissue facial profile in Iranian males and females: clinical implications. World J Plast Surg 2018;7(02):179-185
- Henderson JL, Larrabee WF Jr, Krieger BD. Photographic standards for facial plastic surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7(05):331-333 https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.7.5.331
- Da Silveira AC, Daw JL Jr, Kusnoto B, Evans C, Cohen M. Craniofacial applications of three-dimensional laser surface scanning. J Craniofac Surg 2003;14(04):449-456 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200307000-00009
- Guyuron B. Discussion: the ideal nasolabial angle in rhinoplasty: a preference analysis of the general population. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134(02):211-213 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000388
- Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the Aesthetic Face. New York, NY: Thieme-Stratton; 1984
- Yu MS, Jang YJ. Preoperative computer simulation for Asian rhinoplasty patients: analysis of accuracy and patient preference. Aesthet Surg J 2014;34(08):1162-1171 https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X14547947
- Patel SM, Daniel RK. Indian American rhinoplasty: an emerging ethnic group. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129(03):519e-527e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402d69
- Kim DW, Egan KK. Metrics of nasal tip rotation: a comparative analysis. Laryngoscope 2006;116(06):872-877 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000216796.63683.d3
- Nandini S, Prashanth CS, Somiah SK, Reddy SR. An evaluation of nasolabial angle and the relative inclinations of the nose and upper lip. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12(03):152-157 https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1026
- Biller JA, Kim DW. A contemporary assessment of facial aesthetic preferences. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009;11(02):91-97 https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.2008.543
- Alharethy S. Preferred nasolabial angle in Middle Eastern population. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274(05):2339-2341 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4507-x
- Leach J. Aesthetics and the Hispanic rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 2002;112(11):1903-1916 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200211000-00001
- Harris R, Nagarkar P, Amirlak B. Varied definitions of nasolabial angle: searching for consensus among rhinoplasty surgeons and an algorithm for selecting the ideal method. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016;4(06):e752
- Alharethy SE. The ideal aesthetic nasal dorsum in the Saudi population. Saudi Med J 2013;34(09):920-922
- Leong SC, White PS. A comparison of aesthetic proportions between the Oriental and Caucasian nose. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2004;29(06):672-676 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00891.x
- Crumley RL, Lanser M. Quantitative analysis of nasal tip projection. Laryngoscope 1988;98(02):202-208 https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-198802000-00017
- Simons RL. Nasal tip projection, ptosis, and supratip thickening. Ear Nose Throat J 1982;61:452-455
- Mohebbi A, Jahandideh H, Faham Z, Jafari M. Defining the best nasal tip projection among Iranian women. Plast Surg Int 2016;2016:8549276