한국전자통신학회논문지 (The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences)

한국전자통신학회 (Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

미디어 분야의 기술 주체 특성 연구 -한국특허 출원인 유형 분석-

A Study on the Characteristics of Technology Subjects in the Media Field - Analysis of Types of Korean Patent Applicants -

  • 정연주 (엔씨소프트 TL Camp 시네마팀)
  • 투고 : 2023.08.23
  • 심사 : 2023.10.17
  • 발행 : 2023.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문은 미디어 영상과 밀접한 관련이 있는 영상과 음향기기 제조 기술을 분석하고, 출원인을 기업, 연구소, 대학, 개인, 공공으로 구분하여 기술통계 분석, 집단지성 분석, 개방형 혁신분석을 수행하였다. 연구소 및 대학에서 기술을 통한 혁신적인 아이디어의 발현이 필요하며, 대학에서 미디어 분야의 기술을 확대하기 위한 노력이 필요한 시점이다. 실제 출원된 특허의 내용을 살펴보면 기업이나 개인이 출원한 특허는 미디어 기술과 관련된 것이 많았고, 대학이나 연구소에서 출원한 특허는 미디어 콘텐츠와 관련된 것이 많았다. 이는 미디어 기술과 콘텐츠는 불가분의 관계에 있으며 하드웨어 기술 특허의 광범위하고 심도있는 개발이 필요하며 소프트웨어 콘텐츠가 더욱 다양하고 창의적인 역할을 할 수 있는 원동력이 되어야 함을 의미한다.

This paper analyzed technologies related to video and sound device manufacturing closely related to media images, divided applicants into companies, research institutes, universities, individuals and the public, and conducted technical statistical analysis, collective intelligence analysis, and open innovation analysis. It is necessary to express innovative ideas through technology in research institutes or universities, and efforts are needed to expand technologies in the media field in universities. Looking at the contents of patents actually filed, patents filed by companies or individuals were mostly related to media technology, and patents filed by universities and research institutes were mostly related to media content. This means that hardware technology patents should be developed extensively and in-depth in an inseparable relationship between media technology and content, and should be a driving force for software content to play a more diverse and creative role.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. S. Chang, "Directions and Policy Tasks for Industrial Structure Changes in the Era of the 4th Industrial Revolution," Planning and Policy, no. 424, Feb. 2017, pp. 22-30.
  2. H. Kim, "Characteristics of patent information," Polymer Science and Technology, vol. 15, no. 6, Dec. 2004, pp. 744-749.
  3. I. Yun, S. Kim, and E. Jeong, "Evaluation of Technology Activity, Innovation and Productivity using Korean Patent Information," J. Information Management, vol. 42, no. 2, 2011, pp. 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.2.151
  4. H. Sim and J. Kim, "Development of a sign language learning assistance system using MediaPipe for sign language education of deaf-mutility", J. of The Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Sciences, vol. 16, no. 06, 2021, pp. 1355-1362.
  5. C. Lee and K. Kim, "Cognitive Training Protocol Design and System Implementation using AR", J. of The Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Sciences, vol. 17, no. 06, 2022, pp. 1207-1212.
  6. H. Kim, J. Kim, K. Jang, and J. Han, "Are the Blockchain-Based Patents Sustainable for Increasing Firm Value?," Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 1739, 2020, pp. 1-17.
  7. B. Kim and E. Hyun, "Mapping the Landscape of Blockchain Technology Knowledge: A Patent Co-Citation and Semantic Similarity Approach," Systems, vol. 11, no. 111, 2023, pp. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11030111
  8. Y. Son, S. Kim, and Y. Choi, "ICT Trend Analysis Based on Research Papers and Patents," J. Korea Convergence Society, vol. 12 no. 12, 2021, pp. 1-18.
  9. J. Shim and J. Choi, "Curriculum of IoT by IPC Code Analysis of Patents," J. Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, vol. 25, no. 11, 2021, pp. 1642-1648.
  10. J. Park and Y. Ock, "The Analysis of Promising Technology of Regional Main Industry Using Patent Indicators - Focusing on Changwon-si -," J. Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, vol. 23, no. 11, 2019, pp. 1414-1419.
  11. Y. You, K. Choi, B. Park, and E. Jeong, "Technology Trend of Smart Clothing: Based on Patent Information Analysis," J. Korea Contents Association, vol. 13, no. 4, 2013, pp. 440-451. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.04.440
  12. I. Kwon, "A Comparative Study of Korea and US on Joint Inventorship," J. Intellectual Property, vol. 15, no. 3, 2020, pp. 79-110. https://doi.org/10.34122/jip.2020.09.15.3.79
  13. H. Chesbrough and A. K. Crowther, "Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries," R&D Management, vol. 36, no. 3, 2006, pp. 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x
  14. U. Lichtenthaler, "Open innovation in practice: an analysis of strategic approaches to technology transactions," IEEE Trans. on engineering management, vol. 55, 2008, pp. 148-157. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.912932
  15. K. Laursen and A. Salter, "Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms," Strategic Management J, vol. 27, 2006, pp. 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
  16. J. Yun, O. Kwon, J. Park, and E. Jeong, "A Study on the Development and Adaption of Open Innovation Analysis Model," Korea Technology Innovation Society, vol. 13, no. 1, 2010, pp. 99-123.