의학교육논단 (Korean Medical Education Review)

  • 제25권3호
  • /
  • Pages.273-284
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2092-5603(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-6370(eISSN)
연세대학교 의과대학 (Yonsei university college of medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기본의학교육 평가인증기준의 사회적 책무성 반영 수준 분석

Analysis of the degree of social accountability in accreditation standards for basic medical education

  • 이상미 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 의학교육학교실) ;
  • 양은배 (연세대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실)
  • Sangmi T Lee (Department of Medical Education, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Eunbae B. Yang (Department of Medical Education, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2023.04.27
  • 심사 : 2023.10.04
  • 발행 : 2023.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

According to the World Health Organization, for medical schools to fulfill their obligation of social accountability, it is necessary for medical education, research, and service areas to ref lect the healthcare system's relevance, quality, cost-effectiveness, and equity. This study utilized Boelen and Heck's (1995) social accountability grid model to analyze the degree to which the Accreditation Standards of Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation 2019 (ASK2019) standards apply the World Federation for Medical Education's (WFME) standards. The social accountability characteristics of the former were compared to those of the WFME, the Liaison Committee on Medical Education, and the Australian Medical Council. Experts with experience and certification in medical education and evaluation classified the ASK2019 standards according to the grid model, evaluated social accountability perspectives, and categorized them according to the process, content, and outcome. Of the 92 standards, 61 (66.30%) were selected as social accountability standards; these encompassed all areas. There was a particular focus on outcome-related areas, such as "mission and outcomes," "student assessment," "educational evaluation," and "continuous improvement." Education and quality were the most common (33, 54.11%), followed by 18 standards related to education and relevance. However, the standards on cost effectiveness and equity corresponding to education, research, and service were significantly insufficient. As a result of classification using a logic model, many criteria were incorporated into the process, producing results similar to those of international accreditation institutions. Therefore, to fulfill medical schools' social accountability, it is necessary to develop cost effectiveness and equity standards with reference to grid models and expand them beyond education to include research and service areas. Developing content and outcome standards is also required.

키워드

과제정보

연구에 도움을 주신 연세대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실과 연구에 참여해 주신 참여자분들께 감사드린다.

참고문헌

  1. World Health Organization. Global strategy for health for all by the year 2000. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1981. 90 p.
  2. Boelen C, Heck JE. Defining and measuring the social accountability of medical schools [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1995 [cited 2023 Apr 1]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/59441
  3. Boelen C. The WHO "Towards Unity for Health" strategy and the social responsibility of medical schools. Sante Publique. 2003;15:137-45. https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.hs030.0137
  4. Boelen C. Building a socially accountable health professions school: towards unity for health. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2004;17(2):223-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576280410001711049
  5. Boelen C, Woollard B. Social accountability and accreditation: a new frontier for educational institutions. Med Educ. 2009;43(9):887-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03413.x
  6. Gil YM, Jeon WT. Social accountability of medical schools: concept and implementation strategies. Korean Med Educ Rev. 2019;21(3):127-36. https://doi.org/10.17496/kmer.2019.21.3.127
  7. Global Consensus for Social Accountability of Medical Schools. Global Consensus for Social Accountability of Medical Schools [Internet]. San Francisco (CA): Health Social Accountability; 2010 [cited 2023 Apr 1]. Available from: https://healthsocialaccountability.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2011/06/11-06-07-GCSA-English-pdf-style.pdf
  8. Boelen C. Why should social accountability be a benchmark for excellence in medical education? Educ Med. 2016;17(3):101-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2016.06.004
  9. Philibert I, Blouin D. Responsiveness to societal needs in postgraduate medical education: the role of accreditation. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(Suppl 1):309. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02125-1
  10. Dash NR, Taha MH, Shorbagi S, Abdalla ME. Evaluation of the integration of social accountability values into medical education using a problem-based learning curriculum. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):181. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03245-6
  11. Lim KY. A proposal for the future of medical education accreditation. Korean Med Educ Rev. 2020;22(1):28-31. https://doi.org/10.17496/kmer.2020.22.1.28
  12. Yang EB, Meng KH. Five suggestions for future medical education in Korea. Korean J Med Educ. 2014;26(3):167-78. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2014.26.3.167
  13. Meng K. The history and implications of the medical education accreditation system in Korea: implementation and activities in early stages. Korean Med Educ Rev. 2020;22(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.17496/kmer.2020.22.1.1
  14. Lee ST, Yang EB. Factors affecting social accountability of medical schools in the Korean context: exploratory factor and multiple regression analyses. Med Educ Online. 2022;27(1):2054049. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2054049
  15. Ahn D. Current trend of accreditation within medical education. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:30. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.30
  16. Yoo HH, Kim MK , Yoon YS, Lee KM, Lee JH, Hong SJ, et al. Change of accreditation standards of medical schools by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation from 2000 to 2019. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:2. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.2
  17. Lindgren S, Karle H. Social accountability of medical education: aspects on global accreditation. Med Teach. 2011;33(8):667-72. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.590246
  18. Abdalla ME. Social Accountability of Medical Schools: do accreditation standards help promote the concept? J Case Stud Accredit Assess. 2014;3:1-12.
  19. Boelen C, Blouin D, Gibbs T, Woollard R. Accrediting excellence for a medical school's impact on population health. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2019;32(1):41-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/efh.Ef H_204_19
  20. World Federation for Medical Education. Basic medical education: WFME global standards for quality improvement [Internet]. Worcester: World Federation for Medical Education; 2003 [cited 2020 Mar 3]. Available from: https://wfme.org/standards/bme/
  21. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and structure of a medical school: standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to MD degree [Internet]. Washington (DC): Association of American Medical Colleges; American Medical Association; 2008 [cited 2020 Mar 3]. Available from: https://lcme.org/publications/
  22. Australian Medical Council. Assessment and accreditation of medical schools: standards and procedures [Internet]. Kingston: Australian Medical Council; 2002 [cited 2020 Mar 3]. Available from: https://www.amc.org.au/accreditation-and-recognition/accreditation-standards-and-procedures/
  23. Committee on Accreditation of Canadian Medical Schools. CACMS Standards and Elements [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Committee on Accreditation of Canadian Medical Schools; 2017 [cited 2020 Mar 3]. Available from: https://cacms-cafmc.ca/
  24. Australian Medical Council. Standards for assessment and accreditation of primary medical programs by the Australian Medical Council [Internet]. Kingston (ACT): Australian Medical Council; 2012 [cited 2023 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.amc.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Standards-for-Assessment-and-Accreditation-of-Primary-Medical-Programs-by-the-Australian-MedicalCouncil-2012.pdf
  25. General Medical Council. Promoting excellence: standards for medical education and training [Internet]. Manchester: General Medical Council; 2015 [cited 2023 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.gmcuk.org/-/media/documents/promoting-excellence-standards-formedical-education-and-training-2109_pdf-61939165.pdf
  26. World Health Organization; World Federation for Medical Education. WHO-WFME guidelines for accreditation of basic medical education [Internet]. Worcester: World Federation for Medical Education; 2005 [cited 2023 Apr 1]. Available from: https://wfme.org/accreditation/
  27. World Federation for Medical Education. Rationale for Accreditation: accreditation [Internet]. Worcester: World Federation for Medical Education; 2005 [cited 2023 Apr 1]. Available from: https://wfme.org/recognition/accreditation/
  28. Abdalla ME. Suggested new standards to measure social accountability of medical schools in the accreditation systems. J Case Stud Accredit Assess. 2014;3:1-25.
  29. World Federation for Medical Education. WFME global standards for quality improvement in medical education: European specifications [Internet]. Worcester: World Federation for Medical Education; 2007 [cited 2023 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.educacionmedica.net/pdf/documentos/bolonia/especifeuropeo.pdf
  30. Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation. The new standards for accreditation (ASK2019) [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation; 2019 [cited 2023 Apr 1]. Available from: https://kimee.or.kr/en/standards/the-new-standards-for-accredication/
  31. Albanese MA, Mejicano G, Mullan P, Kokotailo P, Gruppen L. Defining characteristics of educational competencies. Med Educ. 2008;42(3):248-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02996.x