벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제18권5호
  • /
  • Pages.241-253
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

벤처기업에 대한 환경적 요소가 역량 및 성과에 미치는 영향: 벤처기업 확인제도 혜택과 벤처기업 내부 역량의 이중매개효과를 중심으로

The Effect of Environmental Factors on Competency and Performance of Venture Companies: The Double Mediating Effect of Venture Firm Confirmation System Benefits and Venture Firm Internal Competencies

  • 박다인 (중앙대학교 경영경제대학) ;
  • 김대진 (중앙대학교 일반대학원 문화예술경영학과)
  • Park, Dain (College of Business & Economics, Chungang University) ;
  • Kim, Daejin (General graduate school, Chungang University)
  • 투고 : 2023.09.10
  • 심사 : 2023.10.27
  • 발행 : 2023.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

현재 급변하는 환경 속에서 각 국가는 일자리 창출 및 기술 경쟁력 강화를 위한 노력을 지속하고 있다. 특히 벤처기업 및 창업기업에 대한 지원과 활성화 정책은 국가 경쟁력을 높이는 역할을 하는 것으로 알려져 있다. 경쟁 심화로 비즈니스 수명이 짧아지고 고객들의 요구가 다양화되는 환경의 불확실성이 확대되는 가운데 기업은 적절한 대처를 해야 한다. 우선 기업은 스스로 내부 역량을 강화하는 노력을 하는 것이 중요하다. 그러나 벤처기업은 내부 자원 및 역량 등이 부족하여 외부 환경으로부터의 지원이 기업의 생존으로 연결될 만큼 중요하다고 볼 수 있다(Timmons, 1994). 기업의 경쟁력 강화를 위해 국가 차원에서 재정지원 및 인증제도를 운용하고 있다. 그러나 재정지원은 상황에 따라 기업의 자생력을 낮출 수 있으므로 연구개발 지원 및 창업교육과 같은 비 재정적 지원이 벤처기업 성장에 장기적으로 도움이 된다고 보았다(Aghion et al., 2012; 전미미·고강혁, 2021). 비 재정적 지원은 사업화, 시설, 공간, 보육, 인력, 인증제도 등으로 구분되는데 본 연구에서는 인증제도인 벤처기업 확인제도의 혜택을 중심으로 확인하였다. 이를 위해 2021년도 벤처기업정밀실태조사 데이터 및 벤처기업의 매출액 데이터를 활용하였으며, SPSS 26.0 패키지와 SPSS PROCESS MACRO를 활용하여 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 벤처기업의 경영환경 수준은 벤처확인제도 혜택이나 벤처기업 역량 수준을 높이는 데는 긍정적인 영향을 주지만, 실질적인 경영성과로 이어지기는 어려운 것으로 확인되었다. 또한 벤처기업의 경영환경 수준과 경영성과 간 관계를 벤처기업 역량 수준이 매개하는 것으로 확인되었다. 결과적으로 단순히 벤처기업의 경영환경 수준이 긍정적이거나 벤처기업에 친화적일지라도 외부 환경으로부터의 지원을 잘 소화할 수 있는 내부 역량이 있는 기업이 경영성과를 높인다고 할 수 있다.

In the current rapidly changing environment, each country continues to make efforts to create jobs and strengthen technological competitiveness. In particular, support and revitalization policies for venture companies and start-ups are known to play a role in increasing national competitiveness. Companies should make appropriate replacements amid growing uncertainties in the environment in which business life is shortened and customer needs are diversified due to intensifying competition. First of all, it is important for companies to make efforts to strengthen their internal capabilities on their own. However, venture companies lack internal resources and capabilities, so support from the external environment is important enough to lead to the survival of the company(Timmons, 1994). Financial support and certification systems are being operated at the national level to strengthen the competitiveness of companies. However, financial support can lower a company's self-sustainability depending on the situation, so non-financial support such as R&D support and start-up education is considered to be helpful in the long term for venture growth(Aghion et al., 2012; Jeon & Ko, 2021). Non-financial support is divided into commercialization, facilities, space, childcare, manpower, and certification systems, and this study confirmed the benefits of the venture company confirmation system, which is a certification system. To this end, the 2021 venture company precision survey data and venture company sales data were used, and analyzed using the SPSS 26.0 package and SPSS PROCESS MACRO. As a result of the analysis, it was confirmed that the level of the management environment of venture companies has a positive effect on the benefits of the venture confirmation system or increasing the level of venture company capabilities, but it is difficult to lead to actual management performance. In addition, it was confirmed that the level of venture company competency mediates the relationship between the level of the venture company's business environment and management performance. As a result, even if the level of the venture company's business environment is positive or venture-friendly, it can be said that companies with internal capabilities to digest support from the external environment increase management performance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aghion, P., Askenazy, P., N. Berman, G. Cette., & Eymard, L.(2012). Credit Constraints and the Cyclicality of R&D Investment: Evidence from France, Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(5), 1001-1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01093.x
  2. Aldrich, H. E., & Auster, E. R.(1986). Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications, in L.L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 165-198.
  3. Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J.(1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic management journal, 14(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140105
  4. An, K. S.(2010). A Study on the Effects of Managerial Environment and Entrepreneursh on Business Management Performances. Master Thesis, Graduate School of Hansung University, Seoul, Korea.
  5. Araya-Castillo., L., Oradini, N. B., Yanez-Jara, V. M., & Duque, A. A.(2019). Analysis of the entry mode choice from both transaction costs and resource based theory. Revista Perspectiva Empresarial, 6(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.16967/23898186.228
  6. Bang, E. J.(2022). 1 year of reorganization of venture company confirmation system... Investment and research types have increased significantly. GDNET, 2022.03.16.
  7. Bantel, K. A.(1998). Technology-based, adolescent firm configurations: Strategy identification, context, and performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 205-230 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00033-5
  8. Barro, R. J., & X.(1999). Sala-i-Martin, Economic Growth. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Press.
  9. Barney, J.(1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  10. Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S.(2010). Strategic Management and Competitive advantage: Concepts. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice hall.
  11. Brander, J. A., Du, Q., & Hellmann, T.(2015). The effects of government-sponsored venture capital: international evidence. Review of Finance, 19(2), 571-618. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfu009
  12. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M.(1961). Mechanistic and organic systems. Classics of organizational theory, 209-214.
  13. Breivik-Meyer, M., Arntzen-Nordqvist, M., & Alsos, G. A.(2020). The role of incubator support in new firms accumulation of resources and capabilities. Innovation, 22(3), 228-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1684204
  14. Chenhall, R. H., & Morris, D.(1986). The Impact of Structure, Environment, and Interdependence on the perceived Usefulness of Management Accounting Systems. The Accounting Review, 61(1), 16-35.
  15. Cho, K. W.(2010). Effects of Firm Characteristics on Qualification for Government R&D Supports, Journal of Technology Innovation, 18(1), 99-121.
  16. Chrisman, J. J., Bauerschmidt, A., & Hofer, C. W.(1998). The determinants of new venture performance: An extended model. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 23(1), 5-29.
  17. Daft, R. L., & Steers, R. M.(1986). Organizations A Micro/Macro Approach, Harper Collins. New York, NY.
  18. Downey, H. K., Hellriegel, D., & Slocum Jr, J. W.(1975). Environmental Uncertainty: The Construct and its application. Administrative science quarterly, 613-629.
  19. Drazin, R., & Van de Ven, A. H.(1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative science quarterly, 514-539.
  20. Duncan, R. B.(1972). Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392145
  21. Grant, R. M.(1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy fomulation. California management review, 33(3), 114-135. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166664
  22. Griliches, Z.(1979). Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 92-116. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003321
  23. Hart, S. L.(1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of management review, 20(4), 986-1014. https://doi.org/10.2307/258963
  24. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K.(1993). Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard business review, 71(2), 75-84.
  25. Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M.(2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: does method really matter?. Psychological science, 24(10), 1918-1927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480187
  26. Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D.(1984). Corporate distinctive competence and performance: Effects of perceived environmental uncertainty(PEU), size, and technology. Decision Sciences, 15(3), 324-349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1984.tb01222.x
  27. Hong, E. Y., An, G. D., & Sung, E. H.(2020). A Study on the Improvement of Law Analysis of Venture Preferential System on Technology-based Startups. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 15(2), 111-125.
  28. Hong, S. C.(2022). 2022 Domestic & International SMEs(Small and Medium-sized Enterprises) Issues & Policy Trends : KOSI Brief. Korea SMEs & Startups Institute, 22-02.
  29. Hur, M. W.(2013). How Researchers Estimate Indirect Effect using Bootstrapping:The Case ofSimple, Multiple, and Double Mediation. Korean Business Review, 6(3), 43-59.
  30. Jeon, M. M., & Koh, K. H.(2021). The Effect of Government Support on Venture Companies' Management Performances. Korean Journal of Public Finance, 14(4), 1-26.
  31. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P.(1992). The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance, Harvard Business Review, (January-February), 71-79.
  32. Kaufmann, A., & Todtling, F.(2002). How effective is innovation support for SMEs? An analysis of the region of Upper Austria. Technovation, 22(3), 147-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00081-X
  33. Kim, D. J., & Park, D. I.(2016). The Impact of Corporate Strategies and Government Support Policies on the Corporate Performance: Focusing on Certification of Innovation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.11.1.201602.13
  34. Kim, H. C.(2011). A Study on the Effects of the Fit between Competence and Strategy on Firm Performance in Venture Business. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 24(2), 769-787.
  35. Kim, S. N., Yoon, K. S., & Lee, C. H.(2007). A Study on the relationship between Technological needs and the Governmental support system to Venture Businesses. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 20(1), 321-337.
  36. Lee, J. E.(2023). The Impact of Corporate Business Environment on Strategic Management Accounting Systems and Management Accounting Practices. The e-Business Studies, 24(3), 191-203. https://doi.org/10.20462/tebs.2023.6.24.3.191
  37. Lee, Y. H., & Song, Y. J.(2019). The Effects of the Government Funding on Venture Firms' Management Performance: Focusing on the Mediation Effect of Firms' Internal Competencies and the Moderation Effect of Firm's Growth Stage. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.14.2.201904.31
  38. Ma, C. H., & CHOI, G. H.(2021). A Study on the Determinants of Success in Technology Commercialization of Innovative Technology SMEs :with a focus on the New Excellent Technology(NET) Certification System. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 95-108.
  39. Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R.(1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic management journal, 13(5), 363-380. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130505
  40. Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H.(1984). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management science, 30(10), 1161-1183. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.10.1161
  41. Ministry of SMEs and Startups.(2018). Innovative Measures for Private-Centered Venture Ecosystems. Retrieved(2023.09.01.) from https://www.tipa.or.kr/s040101/file_ down/id/5666.
  42. Ministry of SMEs and Startups.(2020). Venture business confirmation system, private-led reorganization. Retrieved(2023.09.01.) from https://eiec.kdi.re.kr/policy/materialView.do?num=200292&cat=epic1&source=newsletter&utm_campaign=9_KDI_Letter_Send&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email.
  43. Ministry of SMEs and Startups.(2023). Guidebook for the Venture Business Confirmation System: Guide to Introduction and Confirmation of the System. Retrieved(2023.09.01.) from https://www.smes.go.kr/venturein/file/download?key=/public/requireguide/%EB%B2%A4%EC%B2%98%EA%B8%B0%EC%97%85%ED%98%91%ED%9A%8C_v7.pdf.
  44. Motoyama, Y., & Knowlton, K.(2016). From resource munificence to ecosystem integration: the case of government sponsorship in St. Louis. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(5-6), 448-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1186749
  45. Oh, C. W.(2019). Is it different from 20 years ago when the "bubble" broke out after the venture craze. Hankyoreh, 2019.07.20.
  46. Orlikowski, W. J.(1996). Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situational Change Perspective. Information System Research, 7(1), 63-92. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.63
  47. Park, D. I., & Park, C. H.(2018). Enterprise Competitiveness and Corporate Performance Creation Strategies by Stage of growth on firm. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 13(6), 177-189.
  48. Park, K. M., & Hwang, J. W.(2016). Organizational capability, competitive strategy and firm performance in venture businesses. Journal of Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 17(2), 272-281. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.2.272
  49. Peteraf, M. A.(1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic management journal, 14(3), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303
  50. Porter, M. E.(1985). Technology and Competitive advantage. Journal of business strategy, 5(3), 60-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb039075
  51. Seo, Y. M., & Hyun, B. H.(2019). A Study on Performance Creation through Open Innovation with Corporate Environments. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 10(12), 81-91.
  52. Song, C. S.(2012). Are There Financial Performances Among Venture Firms by the Number of Rounds of Venture Registration Certification as a Venture Firm?. Korean Corporation Management Review, 19(3), 25-45.
  53. Sharfman, M. P., & Dean Jr, J. W.(1997). Flexibility in strategic decision making: informational and idelogical perspective. Journal of management studies, 34(2), 191-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00048
  54. Shrivastava, P.(1995). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic management journal, 16(S1), 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160923
  55. Timmons, J. A.(1994). New Venture Creation(4th ed), Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
  56. Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V.(1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of management review, 11(4), 801-814.
  57. Waheeduzzaman, A. N. M., & Ryans Jr, J. K.(1996). Definition, Perspectives and understanding of international competitiveness: A quest for a common ground. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 6(2), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb046333
  58. Wernerfelt, B.(1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
  59. Zahra, S. A., & George, G.(2002). The Net-Enabled Business Innovation Cycle and the Evolutionof Dynamic Capabilities. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 147-150. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.147.90
  60. Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbeck, J.(1973). Innovation and Organizations. John Wiley, New York, 45-68.
  61. Zaltman, G., Pinson, C., & Angelmar, R.(1973). Metatheory and Consumer Behavior Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.