Journal of Research and Publication Ethics (연구윤리)

Korea Distribution Science Association (한국유통과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research Ethics in the Aviation Service Industry

  • Received : 2024.01.29
  • Accepted : 2024.03.05
  • Published : 2024.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study seeks to discuss research ethics, not only the academic honesty and sincerity that researchers who study aviation services academically should have, but also the direction of the moral aspects that are fundamentally required as researchers. Additionally, this study seeks to examine the realistic problems of research related to the aviation service industry, a field of social science. Lastly, focusing on research ethics in the aviation service field, we will look at the theoretical background and the problems in the actual research field, and draw implications based on this. Research design, data and methodology: This study conducted an exploratory study through a selection process based on research ethics topics and research ethics related to the aviation service industry. Results: Efforts to systematize research ethics in research areas related to the aviation service industry, which is a field of social science, require efforts to expand the scope of systematization of research ethics related to the aviation service industry by referring to systemization efforts in other academic fields. In addition, specific systemization efforts will be needed through cooperation between universities, research institutes, and academic organizations. Also, concrete systematization efforts will be needed through cooperation between universities and academic organizations.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, S. H. (2009). Quantitative Analysis of Ethics Research within the Korean Nursing Community. Korean J Med Ethics, 12(3), 261-274.
  2. Byun, H., & Kwon, J, Y. (2019). Empirical Analysis for Improvement of Research Ethics Education in Sport Studies, The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 58(4), 193-211.
  3. Duh, M., Bleak, J., & Milfelner, B. (2010). Culture and Ethical Climate as Constitutional Elements of Ethical Behavior: Exploring Differences Between Family and Non-Family Enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 473-489.
  4. Elliott, T. Marquis, L., & Neal, C. (2013). Business Ethics Perspectives: Faculty Plagiarism and Fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 91-99.
  5. Homan, R. (1991). The Ethics of Social Research. London: Longman.
  6. Kang, E. H., Kim, E. A., & Kwon, B. G. (2006). Opinions and Suggestions of Biological Scientists on Research Ethics Education, Korean Journal of Medical Ethics, 9(2), 187-202.
  7. Kang, N. H. (2006). Plagiarism and Duplicate Publication that Led to the Fall of the Prime Minister of Education, Middle school Woori Education, 99, 54-57.
  8. Kim, G. T. (2018). Learning Ethics and Research Ethics in the Field of Creative Writing. The Society of Korean Literary Creative Writing, 17(3), 199~223.
  9. Kim, J. H. (2022). Ethical Perspectives in Studying the Participatory Behavior of Refugee Youth: The Case of Sports and Leisure Activities. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 3(2), 7-11.
  10. Kim, S. H. (2016). Problems of the present Verification System about Research Misconduct and their Solutions. Korea Science & Art Forum, 26, 59-71.
  11. Kimmel, A. J. (1988). Ethics and Values in Applied Social Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  12. Maeng, G. H. (2003). Ethics Education in Korean Medical Schools. Korean Journal of Medical Ethics, 6(1), 1-14.
  13. National Research Foundation of Korea (2024). Academic research field classification table
  14. National Research Foundation of Korea (2024). Guidelines for securing research ethics.
  15. Resnik, D. B. (1999). The Ethics of Science. Bio Medical Education. Campbell.
  16. Suh, J. H. (2023). Ethical Behaviors for Conducting Research based on the Perspective of Marketing Researchers. Research and Publication Ethics, 4(1). 23-29.