Journal of Research and Publication Ethics (연구윤리)

Korea Distribution Science Association (한국유통과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Consciousness of Research Ethics on Job Commitment - Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Ethical Efficacy and Self-efficacy

  • Min-Jung KANG (Department of Business and Management, Mokpo National University) ;
  • Hee-Joong HWANG (Department of International Trade, Korea National Open University)
  • Received : 2024.01.15
  • Accepted : 2024.03.05
  • Published : 2024.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Since 2006, social, ethical, and institutional options have been attempted in Korea to establish research ethics; however, the effectiveness of these attempts has not been thoroughly examined. Studies have been conducted abroad to determine the timeliness of social, ethical and institutional alternatives, such as the adoption of laws governing research ethics, the improvement of research ethics education, the bolstering of systems, the introduction of incentive programs, and the creation of social environments that support research ethics. Research design, data, and methodology: Specific facets of research misconduct or research ethics must be investigated and verified. Aspects of moral growth at the person level must be investigated via research ethics and research ethics education. Results: There is an increasing need for the general public to define and uphold research ethics as the impact of research findings on society grows. Researchers can boost their confidence in their ethical judgments and actions by being aware of research ethics. This may lead to confidence in their capacity to make morally sound decisions. Conclusion: By doing this study, the researcher confirmed that ethically correct behavior can lead to and realize self-growth. Researchers may be more interested in and dedicated to their work when they feel that their research might help them mature and develop ethically.

Keywords

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
  2. Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Yielding to Temptation: Self-Control Failure, Impulsive Purchasing, and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 670-676, https://doi.org/10.1086/338209.
  3. Bradley D. E., & Roberts J. A. (2004). Self-employment and job satisfaction: investigating the role of self-efficacy, depression, and seniority. Journal of Small Business Management, 42, 37-58.
  4. Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616.
  5. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62-83.
  6. Drolet, M., Rose-Derouin, E., Leblanc, J., Ruest, M., & Williams-Jones, B. (2022). Ethical issues in research: perceptions of researchers, research ethics board members and research ethics experts. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(2), 269-292, doi: 10.1007/s10805-022-09455-3.
  7. Hyytinen, H., & Lofstrom, E. (2017). Reactively, Proactively, Implicitly, Explicitly? Academics' Pedagogical Conceptions of how to Promote Research Ethics and Integrity. Journal of Academic Ethics. 15, 23-41. 10.1007/s10805-016-9271-9.
  8. Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151-188.
  9. Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of Job and Work Involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 341-349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.341
  10. Luthans, F., Luthans, K. W., & Luthans, B. C. (2004). Positive psychological capital: beyond human and social capital. Business Horizons, 47(1), 45-50.
  11. Macrina, F. L. (2005). Scientific integrity: Text and cases in responsible conduct of research. 3rd edition. ASM Press: Washington (D.C.). 428p. (paper) ISBN 1-55581-318-6.
  12. May, D., Chan, A., Hodges, T., & Avolio, B. (2003). Developing the Moral Component of Authentic Leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 32, 247-260. 10.1016/S0090-2616(03)00032-9.
  13. May, D. R., Luth, M., & Schwoerer, C. E. (2010). The Effects of Moral Efficacy, Moral Courage, and Moral Meaningfulness on Moral Behaviors at Work. In Paper presented at the 2010 Academy of Management meeting in Montreal, Canada.
  14. Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the Meaning of Work: A Theoretical Integration and Review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91-127.
  15. Shamoo, A. E., & Resnik, B. R. (2003). Responsible Conduct of Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  16. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865.
  17. Steger, M. F., Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2012). Measuring Meaningful Work: The Work and Meaning Inventory (MWI). Journal of Career Assessment, 00, 1-16.
  18. Steneck, N. (2004). Assessing the Integrity of Publicly Funded Research.
  19. Tammeleht, A., Lofstrom, E., & Rodriguez-Triana, J. M. J. (2022). Facilitating development of research ethics and integrity leadership competencies. International journal for educational integrity, 18, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00102-3.
  20. Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1987). A Theory and Measure of Ethical Climate in Organizations. In: Frederick, W.C. and Preston, L., Eds., Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, JAL, London, 51-71.